Skip to main content

Implications of the Circular Economy for Electronic Products

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies and Eco-innovation towards Sustainability I

Abstract

The circular economy concept of the European Union aims to save energy and material resources while minimizing resource risks and giving the EU a competitive advantage in economic terms. This paper explores the implications of the circular economy for electronic products by analyzing design aspects such as durability, reparability, reusability, remanufacturing, as well as plastic recycling and the application of recycled plastics in new products. This involves both reviewing how those aspects are finding their way into new requirements under the EU Ecodesign Directive and highlighting select activities in the research landscape and on company level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission. Closing the loop–An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Communication of the European Commission, Brussels. 2015. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614.

  2. European Commission. Report on critical raw materials for the EU, Brussels. 2014. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/specific-interest/critical_de.

  3. Council Directive 2009/125/EC of October 2009 on establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Geerken T, Kazmierczyk P. More from less – material resource efficiency in Europe–2015 overview of policies, instruments and targets in 32 countries. Luxembourg: European Environment Agency; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cucchiella F, D’Adamo I, Koh L, Rosa P. Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;51(2015):163–272.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schischke, K. Product design for the efficient use of critical materials–The case of mobile information technology devices, ESM workshop at World Resources Forum. Davos. 2015. Available: http://www.esmfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Schischke_Modularity_13102015.pdf.

  7. Proske M, Clemm C, Richter N. Life cycle assessment of the fairphone 2. 2016. Available: https://www.fairphone.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Fairphone_2_LCA_Final_20161122.pdf.

  8. Umweltbundesamt, ongoing research, Strengthening of resource efficiency and waste minimization in product policy instruments, project number 3714 95 3070.

    Google Scholar 

  9. EC. Draft regulation–ecodesign requirements for electronic displays. European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, Brussels. 2016. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/initiatives/ares-2016-7108187_en.

  10. Maya-Drysdale L, Peled M, Wood J, Rames M, Viegand J. Preparatory study on the Review of Regulation 617/2013 (Lot 3) computers and computer servers–Task 7.1 report: Presentation of policy measures–Final version for consultation. 2017. Available: https://computerregulationreview.eu/documents.

  11. Berwald A, Faninger T, Bayramoglu S, Tinetti B, Mudgal S, Stobbe L, Nissen N. Ecodesign preparatory study on enterprise servers and data equipment–ENTR Lot 9. Brussels: European Commission; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60529:1989+AMD1:1999+AMD2:2013 CSV–Consolidated version–Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code). 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Commission Regulation (EU) No 666/2013. Implementing Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for vacuum cleaners. 2013. Available: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013R0666&from=EN.

  14. Marwede M, Clemm C, Dimitrova G, Tecchio P, Ardente F, Mathieux F. Analysis of material efficiency aspects of personal computers product group–Technical support for Environmental Footprinting, material efficiency in product policy and the European Platform on LCA, EUR 28394 EN. 2017. doi https://doi.org/10.2788/89220.

  15. Sitek J, Koscielski M, Dawidowicz P, Ciszewski P, Khramova M, Nguyen Quang D, Martinez S. Investigations of temperature resistance of memory BGA components during multi-reflow processes for Circular Economy applications, EMPC 2017–21st European Microelectronics and Packaging Conference; 2017 Sept 10–13; Warsaw. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Labs L. Frische USB-Sticks mit alten Daten. Germany: Heise Online; 2017. Available: https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Frische-USB-Sticks-mit-alten-Daten-3716992.html

    Google Scholar 

  17. Circular Devices Oy. PuzzleCluster: the first reuse application of the PuzzlePhone. 2015. Available: http://www.puzzlephone.com/blog-read/.

  18. Peeters J, Vanegas P, Tange L, Van Houwelingen J, Duflou J. Closed loop recycling of plastics containing Flame Retardants. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014;84(2014):35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Köhnlechner R. Erzeugung sauberer PS- und ABS-Fraktionen aus gemischtem Elektronikschrott. Berliner Recycling- und Rohstoffkonferenz. 2014. Available: http://www.vivis.de/phocadownload/Download/2014_rur/2014_RuR_379_400_Koehnlechner.pdf.

  20. Schlummer M, Popp L, Trautmann F, Mäurer A. Recovery of bromine and antimony from WEEE plastics, Electronics Goes Green 2016+; 2016 Sept 7–9; Berlin. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dender L, Rifer W. iNEMI repair and recycling metrics project–end of project report. 2015. Available: http://thor.inemi.org/webdownload/2015/Repair_Recycling_Metrics_EOP_Report_072915.pdf.

  22. EPEAT. EPEAT criteria–imaging equipment. 2017. Available: http://www.epeat.net/resources/criteria-2/.

  23. TCO. TCO Certified Edge Display 2.0. TCO Development, Stockholm. 2014. Available: http://tcocertified.com/files/2014/04/140401_TCO-Certified-Edge-Displays-2-0_final-version.pdf.

  24. European Commission (2015) on a standardisation request to the European standardisation organisations as regards ecodesign requirements on material efficiency aspects for energy-related products in support of the implementation of Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Available: ftp://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CENELEC/EuropeanMandates/M543_EN.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Clemm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clemm, C., Nissen, N.F., Schischke, K., Dimitrova, G., Marwede, M., Lang, KD. (2019). Implications of the Circular Economy for Electronic Products. In: Hu, A., Matsumoto, M., Kuo, T., Smith, S. (eds) Technologies and Eco-innovation towards Sustainability I. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1181-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics