Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview and histories of Digital Transformation and Enterprise Architecture, the purpose, scope, and structure of this book. This chapter covers the primary previous researches regarding Enterprise Architecture, consisting of main four categories as well. During the 1980s, the term Architecture Framework appeared with the publication of the Zachman Framework for Information System Architecture. Since the year 2000, Enterprise Architecture has been focused as a method for promoting an IT architecture that establishes consistency between corporate business and IT strategies, and it has been applied mostly in global corporations. And whereas, with the recent progress in Cloud computing, Mobile IT technology, and big data solutions, in the IT systems of global corporations, the shift from conventional on-premise server-based IT systems to Cloud computing, such as Software as a Service (SaaS), hybrid Cloud, and connected Mobile IT systems, has become more pronounced. This book focuses on Architecture Framework suiting an era of Digital IT. In later chapters, we will show the direction of Digital IT and Enterprise Architecture, strategic architecture framework suiting in a Digital IT era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alwadain, A., Fielt, E., Korthaus, A., & Rosemann, M. (2014). A comparative analysis of the integration of SOA elements in widely-used enterprise architecture frameworks. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 9(2), 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alwadain, A., Fielt, E., Korthaus, A., & Rosemann, M. (2016). Empirical insights into the development of a service-oriented enterprise architecture. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 105(2016), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, S., & KPN. (2015). Open group snapshot—open platform 3.0™. The Open Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckl, S., Matthes, F., Schulz, C., & Schweda, C. M. (2010). Exemplifying a framework for interrelating enterprise architecture concerns. In M.-A. Sicilia, C. Kop, & F. Sartori (Eds.), Ontology, conceptualization and epistemology for information systems, software engineering and service science (Vol. 62, pp. 33–46). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16496-5_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier, J.-L., Bérubé, J., & Mr. Hilliard, R. (2014). Architecture Guidance Study Report 140430. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 Software and Systems Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. Q. (2013). Towards the development of an adaptive enterprise service system model. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2013) (pp. 15–17).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. Q. (2014). Applying agility and living service systems thinking to enterprise architecture. International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies, 10(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. Q., Smith, S., Beydoun, G., & Sugumaran, V. (2014). Agile enterprise architecture: A case of a cloud technology-enabled government enterprise transformation. In Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2014) (pp. 1–11). United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, M. S., & Steensen, T. W. (2011). The successful enterprise architecture effort. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 7(4), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruchten, P. (1995). Architectural blueprints—the “4 + 1” view model of software architecture. In Paper Published in IEEE Software (Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 42–50).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohe, J., & Legner, C. (2014). Overcoming implementation challenges in enterprise architecture management: A design theory for architecture-driven IT management (ADRIMA). Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(1), 101–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namba, Y., & Iijima, J. (2005). City planning approach for rebuilding enterprise information systems. Tokyo, Japan: Tokyo Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO Architecture Framework. (2007). Version 3, Annex 1 to AC/322-D 0048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotusev, S. (2016a). The history of enterprise architecture: An evidence-based review. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 12(1), 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotusev, S. (2016b). Different approaches to enterprise architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 12(4), 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Nils Olaya F., & Ross, J. W. (2015). Building business agility: cloud-based services and digitized platform maturity, research briefing (Vol. XV, ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Information Systems Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D.C. (2006). Enterprise Architecture as Strategy – Creating a Foundation for Business Execution, Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirvani, H. (1985). The urban design process. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spewak, S. H., & Hill, S. C. (1992). Enterprise architecture planning: Developing a blueprint for data, applications, and technology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spewak, S. H., & Tiemann, M. (2006). Updating the enterprise architecture planning model. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 2(2), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Open Group. (2002). Mapping the TOGAF ADM to the Zachman framework. Retrieved 2002, from http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/0210can/togaf8/doc-review/togaf8cr/c/p4/zf/zf_mapping.htm

  • The Open Group. (2011). TOGAF version 9.1. Van Haren Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigdon, W. B. (1989). Architectures and standards, in information management directions: In E. N. Fong & A. H. Goldfine (Eds.), The integration challenge (NIST Special Publication 500-167) (pp. 135–150). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshimasa Masuda .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Masuda, Y., Viswanathan, M. (2019). Introduction. In: Enterprise Architecture for Global Companies in a Digital IT Era. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1083-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1083-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1082-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1083-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics