Advertisement

Retrospective Analysis of Engineering Change Iterations—A Case Study on Reducing Engineering Changes by Defining Target Values for Engineering Design

  • Niklas KattnerEmail author
  • Aleksej Trepatschko
  • Gert Assmann
  • Lucia Becerril
  • Udo Lindemann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 513)

Abstract

In the development of technical systems, engineering changes nowadays are more a rule than an exception and can take a big share of the overall capacity of a design project. Thus, reducing avoidable changes can have a huge impact the overall project performance. Hence, knowledge of companies about change iterations can reveal performance lacks in development projects. This paper therefore presents an industrial case study using past change information to reduce engineering change iterations. Hence, it briefly introduces the applied method and describes the procedure to reduce change iterations as well as the findings within the company’s environment in detail.

Keywords

Engineering change management Engineering design Engineering performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft—DFG) for funding this project as part of the collaborative research center „Sonderforschungsbereich 768—Managing cycles in innovation processes—Integrated development of product-service-systems based on technical products“.

References

  1. 1.
    Pikosz P, Malmqvist J (1998) A comparative study of engineering change management in three Swedish engineering companies. In Proceedings of ASME international design engineering technical conferences, design theory and methodologyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ehrlenspiel K, Meerkamm H (2013) Integrierte Produktentwicklung: Denkabläufe, Methodeneinsatz, Zusammenarbeit. Hanser, MünchenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarkson PJ, Simons C, Eckert C (2004) Predicting change propagation in complex design. J Mech Des 126(5):788–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maier A, Langer S (2011) Engineering change management report 2011: survey results on causes and effects, current practice, problems, and strategies in Denmark. Technical University of Denmark. DTU Management Engineering. Report 17Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamraz B, Clarkson PJ (2015) Industrial evaluation of FBS Linkage—a method to support engineering change management. J Eng Des 26(1–3):24–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langer S, Maier A, Wilberg J, Münch T, Lindemann U (2012) Exploring differences between average and critical engineering changes: survey results from Denmark. In International design conference DESIGN. Dubrovnik, CoratiaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark KB, Wheelright SC (1993) Managing new product and process development: text and cases. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Köhler C (2009) Technische Produktänderungen – Analyse und Beurteilung von Lösungsmöglichkeiten auf Basis einer Erweiterung des CPM/PDD-Ansatzes. (Dissertation). Universität des SaarlandesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elezi F, Sharafi A, Mirson A, Wolf P, Krcmar H, Lindemann U (2011) A knowledge discovery in databases (KDD) Approach for extracting causes of iterations in engineering change orders. ASME, 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffin A (1997) PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices. J Prod Innov Manage 14(6):429–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamraz B, Caldwell NHM, Clarkson JP (2013) A holistic categorization framework for literature on engineering change management. Syst Eng 16(4):473–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cooper RG (2008) Perspective: the stage-gate ® Idea-to-launch process—Update, what’s new, and NexGen systems. J Prod Innov Manage 25(3):213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pahl G, Beitz W, Blessing L, Feldhusen J, Grote K-H, Wallace K (eds) (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, London Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stier W (1999) Empirische Forschungsmethoden. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niklas Kattner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aleksej Trepatschko
    • 1
  • Gert Assmann
    • 2
  • Lucia Becerril
    • 1
  • Udo Lindemann
    • 1
  1. 1.Technical University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.Kelvion Holding GmbHBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations