Abstract
Alternative metrics or altmetrics are article level metrics that have been used to quantify the attention given to scholarly papers in online fora or social media. In a way it was sought to replace journal level metrics such as the Impact Factor and also to see if altmetric scores could predict highly cited papers. Early studies, done soon after altmetrics was proposed in 2010, were somewhat premature as the use of social media was not widely prevalent, and their results may no longer be relevant at the present time when use levels have risen significantly. In 2016, Altmetric.com has tracked over 17 million mentions of 2.7 million different research outputs. Of these, the top 100 most-discussed journal articles of 2016 were presented with details of journals in which the research was published, affiliations of authors, fields, countries, etc. Our attempt is to obtain a bibliometric profile of these papers with high altmetric scores to see the underlying patterns and characteristics that motivate high public attention. In parallel we have analyzed top 100 highly cited papers from the same year. Our objective in this empirical study is to examine the similarities and distinguishing features of scientific attention as measured by citations and public attention in online fora.
A significant finding is that there is very little overlap between very highly cited papers and those that received the highest altmetric scores.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
References
Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., Neylon, C.: Altmetrics: A manifesto (2010). http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
Kim, H.S.: Attractability and virality: The role of message features and social influence in health news diffusion. University of Pennsylvania (2014)
Haustein, S.: Grand challenges in altmetrics: heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies. Scientometrics 108(1), 413–423 (2016)
Priem, J.: Altmetrics. Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact, journal? 263–88 (2014)
Wouters P., Costas, R.: Users, Narcissism and Control – Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century. Image Rochester, New York (2012)
Adie, E., Roe, W.: Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learn. Publish. 26(1), 11–17 (2013)
Roemer, R.C., Borchardt, R.: Introduction to Altmetrics. Libr. Tehnol. Reports 51(5), 5–10 (2015)
Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H., Terliesner, J.: Beyond citations: Scholars’ visibility on the social web. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (2012). http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5611/
Sud, P., Thelwall, M.: Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics 98(2), 1131–1143 (2014)
Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)
Piwowar, H., Priem, J.: The power of altmetrics on a CV. Bull. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 39, 10–13 (2013)
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., Wouters, P.: How well developed are Altmetrics? Cross disciplinary analysis of the presence of “alternative metrics” in scientific publications (RIP). In: Proceedings of the 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Vienna, Austria, pp. 876–884. Facultas Verlags und Buchhandels, Wien (2013)
Bornmann, L.: Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. J. Informetrics 8(4), 895–903 (2014)
Fenner, M.: What can article-level metrics do for you? PLoS Biol. 11(10) (2013)
Costas, R., Zahedi, Z., Wouters, P.: Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(10), 2003–2019 (2015)
Liu, J., Adie, E.: Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker’s perspective. Bull. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 39(4), 31–34 (2013)
Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R.: Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE 8(5) (2013)
Thelwall, M., Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship? J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(5), 876–889 (2015)
Haustein, S., Peters, I., Sugimoto, C.R., Thelwall, M., Larivière, V.: Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(4), 656–669 (2014)
Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., Thelwall, M.: Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(5), 1018–1027 (2014)
Haustein, S., Thelwall, M., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C.R.: On the relation between altmetrics and citations in medicine (RIP). In: Hinze, S., Lottmann, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI), Berlin, Germany, pp. 164–166, 4–6 September 2013
Waltman, L., Costas, R.: F1000 recommendations as a potential new data source for research evaluation: a comparison with citations. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(3), 433–445 (2014)
Raza, G., Singh, S., Dutt, B.: Public, science, and cultural distance. Sci. Commun. 23(3), 293–309 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Banshal, S.K., Basu, A., Singh, V.K., Muhuri, P.K. (2018). Scientific vs. Public Attention: A Comparison of Top Cited Papers in WoS and Top Papers by Altmetric Score. In: Erdt, M., Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., Rasmussen, E., Theng, YL. (eds) Altmetrics for Research Outputs Measurement and Scholarly Information Management. AROSIM 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 856. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1053-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1052-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1053-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)