Keywords

1 Introduction

Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios in biogenic calcium carbonate are widely used as proxies for estimating past seawater temperatures (e.g., Henderson 2002; Lea 2003). However, such ratios are also more or less affected by biological processes, so-called vital effects (Cohen and McConnaughey 2003). For example, the Sr/Ca ratio in a coral skeleton (aragonite) and Mg/Ca ratio in a foraminiferan test (calcite) reflect temperature relatively precisely (Lea 2003), whereas Mg/Ca in the former and Sr/Ca in the latter, and both ratios in bivalve shells (both aragonite and calcite), are susceptible to biological modulation (Schöne 2013). Although the vital effect is considered to be species-specific, it remains a major hurdle to interpreting geochemical data as an environmental proxy, as the ultimate mechanism governing elemental fractionation, a detailed understanding and quantitative evaluation of which is essential for reliable past environment reconstruction, is still unclear.

A fundamental question concerns the common existence or otherwise of an elemental fractionation mechanism in any biogenic calcium carbonate. Biomineralization can be interpreted as inorganic mineralization strongly controlled by soluble and insoluble organic materials, as well as physiological control, such as that exerted by pH, physical structure, space regulations, and ion transportation (e.g., Marin et al. 2008). Thus, the relationship between micrometer-scale elemental distribution and microstructure may provide a unique opportunity to investigate the mechanism of element fractionation by biological processes. The aim of the present study was to examine a common, cross-phylum fractionation mechanism based on microscale elemental distribution in coral skeletons and bivalve and foraminiferal shells, comparing elemental distribution, skeletal/shell microstructure, sulfur distribution, and organic features.

2 Materials and Methods

The examined samples included the reef building branching coral Acropora nobilis (Shirai et al. 2008a), deep sea solitary coral Caryophyllia ambrosia ambrosia (Shirai et al. 2005), ocean quahog Arctica islandica (Shirai et al. 2014), deep sea hydrothermal mussel Bathymodiolus platifrons (Shirai et al. 2008b), and planktonic foraminifera Globorotalia menardii (Kunioka et al. 2006). Samples were cleaned, embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned, polished, metal coated where necessary, and analyzed by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) or high lateral resolution secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS). The microstructure was observed by SEM or optical microscope following etching/staining by Mutvei’s solution (Schöne et al. 2005). Specific details of sample origin and preparation and analytical methods are included in the above-cited references.

3 Results

Elemental distribution and skeletal/shell microstructure of the examined samples are shown in Figs. 30.1, 30.2, 30.3, 30.4, and 30.5. Regardless of mineralogy and phylum, the following were common at the microscale level in all of the examined biogenic carbonates: (1) large compositional heterogeneity and (2) element/Ca ratios, skeletal/shell microstructure, sulfur distribution, and insoluble skeletal organic characters all correlated (nonlinear) with one another.

Fig. 30.1
figure 1

Elemental distribution and skeletal microstructure of branching coral Acropora nobilis. (a) EPMA Mg map. (b) EPMA Sr map. (c) EPMA S map. (dg) Skeletal microstructure of polished-etched surface by SEM. (Figures modified from Shirai et al. 2008a). Color scale bar on right indicates gross count per pixel

Fig. 30.2
figure 2

Elemental distribution and skeletal microstructure of deep sea coral Caryophyllia ambrosia ambrosia. (a) EPMA Mg map. (b) EPMA Sr map. (c) Skeletal microstructure observed in thin section under transmitted light microscopy. (Figures modified from Shirai et al. 2005). Color scale bar on right indicates gross count per pixel

Fig. 30.3
figure 3

Elemental distribution and shell microstructure of ocean quahog Arctica islandica. (a) Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca maps partly overlapped on S/Ca map. (bd) High-magnification images of elemental maps and shell microstructure along sixth annual growth line from ventral margin (red rectangles in (a)). From left to right, (1) EPMA Sr/Ca map, (2) EPMA S/Ca map, (3) SEM microstructure image, and (4) inset of (3). HOM homogeneous structure, ISP irregular simple prismatic structure, CA crossed acicular structure, N.C. shell microstructure is not clear. (Figures modified from Shirai et al. 2014). Color scale bar on bottom right in panel (a) indicates gross count ratio (ct/ct count/count) per pixel

Fig. 30.4
figure 4

Elemental distribution and shell microstructure of hydrothermal mussel Bathymodiolus platifrons. (a) EPMA Mg map with NanoSIMS Mg/Ca profile overlaid (right axis for scale). (b) EPMA Sr map with NanoSIMS Sr/Ca profile overlaid. (c) EPMA S map. (d) Shell microstructure of polished-etched surface by SEM with NanoSIMS Mn/Ca profile overlaid. (Figures modified from Shirai et al. 2008b)

Fig. 30.5
figure 5

Elemental distribution and shell microstructure of planktonic foraminifera Globorotalia menardii. (a) Shell microstructure under transmitted light microscopy after EPMA analysis (b) From left to right, EPMA Mg/Ca map, EPMA S/Ca map, shell microstructure of polished-etched surface by SEM and transmitted light microscope image. (c) SEM microstructure image, enlargements of inset of (a). (d) Enlargements of inset of (b). From left to right, (d1) EPMA Mg/Ca map, (d2) EPMA S/Ca map, (d3) EPMA Ca map, (d4) EPMA backscattered electron image, and (d5) transmitted light microscope image. Pink bars represent organic membrane. White dashed lines in (d) act as a guide for comparing each figure on the same position

4 Discussion

The correlation with microstructure suggests that microscale heterogeneity is likely induced by the biomineralization processes, the magnitude of variation being too great to be explained by ambient environmental changes. Similar correlations between chemical composition and microstructure have been documented in other coral skeleton studies (e.g., Meibom et al. 2004, 2008), bivalve shell (Dauphin et al. 2005, 2013; Füllenbach et al. 2017), foraminifera (Sadekov et al. 2005; Kunioka et al. 2006), brachiopod (Pérez-Huerta et al. 2011), and Ostracoda (Morishita et al. 2007), being lines of evidence pointing to an almost universal relationship between elemental distribution and microstructure in any biogenic calcium carbonate, as well as suggesting the existence of a common physiochemical mechanism governing elemental fractionation.

Recent studies have reported that organic molecules present in the calcifying solution enhance Mg incorporation in inorganically precipitated calcite (Stephenson et al. 2008) and amorphous calcium carbonate (Wang et al. 2009). In the latter model, aqueous carboxylated molecules, which have greater selectivity for binding to Ca than Mg, increase the relative activity of Mg against Ca in the solution, producing high Mg/Ca amorphous calcium carbonate, considered a precursor phase of crystalline carbonate (e.g., Pouget et al. 2009). Thus, organically mediated fractionation processes may occur in the early stages of crystallization (Wang et al. 2009), with the mechanism that determines the composition of amorphous calcium carbonate also likely controlling biogenic calcite composition. Since the organic membrane has a characteristic electrostatic structure regulating biomineralization (e.g., Marin et al. 2008; Ren et al. 2011), it is also possible that such a structure of insoluble organics influences elemental incorporation into carbonate. Since biomineralization occurs in calcifying fluid (or calcifying space), the organic (and inorganic) composition of which is highly regulated by the organism, I suggest that both soluble and insoluble organic composition and concentration in calcifying fluids control the microscale elemental distribution commonly found in biogenic calcium carbonate. Changes in the microstructure and sulfur distribution can be considered as signatures of change in the organic composition and sulfur-containing organic matrix in the calcifying medium, respectively. These processes are likely common in any biomineralization. Such an organically mediated fractionation hypothesis can also explain why elemental composition is not correlated with other elements in a quantitative manner, since the function of macromolecules in calcium carbonate precipitation depends not only on their structure and composition but also on their supramolecular assemblage (e.g., Marin et al. 2008). A detailed discussion of this elemental fractionation mechanism is reported in Shirai et al. (2014) and Füllenbach et al. (2017).