Advertisement

A Survey on the Role of Wireless Sensor Networks and IoT in Disaster Management

  • Ahsan AdeelEmail author
  • Mandar Gogate
  • Saadullah Farooq
  • Cosimo Ieracitano
  • Kia Dashtipour
  • Hadi Larijani
  • Amir Hussain
Chapter
Part of the Springer Natural Hazards book series (SPRINGERNAT)

Abstract

Extreme events and disasters resulting from climate change or other ecological factors are difficult to predict and manage. Current limitations of state-of-the-art approaches to disaster prediction and management could be addressed by adopting new unorthodox risk assessment and management strategies. The next generation Internet of Things (IoT), Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), 5G wireless communication, and big data analytics technologies are the key enablers for future effective disaster management infrastructures. In this chapter, we commissioned a survey on emerging wireless communication technologies with potential for enhancing disaster prediction, monitoring, and management systems. Challenges, opportunities, and future research trends are highlighted to provide some insight on the potential future work for researchers in this field.

Keywords

Disaster management Internet of things Wireless sensor networks 5G wireless communication Big data analytics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Grant No. EP/M026981/1.

References

  1. 1.
    Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alemdar H, Ersoy C (2010) Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2688–2710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen D, Liu Z, Wang L, Dou M, Chen J, Li H (2013) Natural disaster monitoring with wireless sensor networks: a case study of data-intensive applications upon low-cost scalable systems. Mobile Netw Appl 18(5):651–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Asimakopoulou E, Bessis N (2011) Buildings and crowds: forming smart cities for more effective disaster management. In: Innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing (IMIS), 2011 fifth international conference on, IEEE, pp 229–234Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shah SIA, Fayed M, Dhodhi M, Mouftah HT (2011) Aqua-net: a flexible architectural framework for water management based on wireless sensor networks. In: Electrical and computer engineering (CCECE), 2011 24th Canadian conference on, IEEE. pp 000481–000484Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kung H-Y, Hua J-S, Chen C-T (2006) Drought forecast model and framework using wireless sensor networks. Journal of information science and engineering 22(4):751–769Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang P, Sun Z, Vuran MC, Al-Rodhaan MA, Al-Dhelaan AM, Akyildiz IF (2011) On network connectivity of wireless sensor networks for sandstorm monitoring. Comput Netw 55(5):1150–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Varnes DJ (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. Number 3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kotta HZ, Rantelobo K, Tena S, Klau G (2011) Wireless sensor network for landslide monitoring in nusa tenggara timur. TELKOMNIKA Telecommun Comput Electron Control 9(1):9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramesh MV (2014) Design, development, and deployment of a wireless sensor network for detection of landslides. Ad Hoc Netw 13:2–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Terzis A, Anandarajah A, Moore K, Wang I (2006) Slip surface localization in wireless sensor networks for landslide prediction. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on information processing in sensor networks, ACM, pp 109–116Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee H-C, Ke K-H, Fang Y-M, Lee B-J, Chan T-C (2017) Open-source wireless sensor system for long-term monitoring of slope movement. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 66(4):767–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosi A, Berti M, Bicocchi N, Castelli G, Corsini A, Mamei M, Zambonelli F (2011) Landslide monitoring with sensor networks: experiences and lessons learnt from a real-world deployment. Int J Sens Netw 10(3):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giorgetti A, Lucchi M, Tavelli E, Barla M, Gigli G, Casagli N, Chiani M, Dardari D (2016) A robust wireless sensor network for landslide risk analysis: system design, deployment, and field testing. IEEE Sens J 16(16):6374–6386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rawat P, Haddad M, Altman E (2015) Towards efficient disaster management: 5 g and device to device communication. In: Information and communication technologies for disaster management (ICT-DM), 2015 2nd international conference on, IEEE, pp 79–87Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doumi TL (2006) Spectrum considerations for public safety in the united states. IEEE Commun Mag 44(1):30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorcin A, Arslan H (2008) Public safety and emergency case communications: opportunities from the aspect of cognitive radio. In: New frontiers in dynamic spectrum access Networks, 2008. DySPAN 2008. 3rd IEEE symposium on, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robles JJ, Tromer S, Quiroga M, Lehnert R (2010) A low-power scheme for localization in wireless sensor networks. In: Meeting of the European Network of Universities and companies in information and communication engineering, pp 259–262. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramesh MV, Shanmughan A, Prabha R (2014) Context aware ad hoc network for mitigation of crowd disasters. Ad Hoc Netw 18:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nishiyama H, Ito M, Kato N (2014) Relay-by-smartphone: realizing multihop device-to-device communications. IEEE Commun Mag 52(4):56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rose K, Eldridge S, Chapin L (2015) The internet of things: an overview. The internet society (ISOC), pp 1–50Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaur N, Sood SK (2017) An energy-efficient architecture for the internet of things (iot). IEEE Syst J 11(2):796–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adelantado F, Vilajosana X, Tuset-Peiro P, Martinez B, Melia-Segui J, Watteyne T (2017) Understanding the limits of lorawan. IEEE Commun Mag 55(9):34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lloret J, Parra L, Taha M, Tomás J (2017) An architecture and protocol for smart continuous ehealth monitoring using 5g. Comput Netw 129:340–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Oliveira R, Guardalben L, Sargento S (2017) Long range communications in urban and rural environments. In: Computers and communications (ISCC), 2017 IEEE symposium on, pp 810–817Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Petäjäjärvi J, Mikhaylov K, Pettissalo M, Janhunen J, Iinatti J (2017) Performance of a low-power wide-area network based on lora technology: Doppler robustness, scalability, and coverage. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 13(3):1550147717699412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hosseinzadeh S, Larijani H, Curtis K, Wixted A, Amini A (2017) Empirical propagation performance evaluation of lora for indoor environment. In: Industrial informatics (INDIN), 2017 IEEE 15th international conference on, pp 26–31Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bor M, Roedig U (2017) Lora transmission parameter selection. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE international conference on distributed computing in sensor systems (DCOSS), Ottawa, ON, Canada, pp 5–7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahsan Adeel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mandar Gogate
    • 1
  • Saadullah Farooq
    • 1
  • Cosimo Ieracitano
    • 2
  • Kia Dashtipour
    • 1
  • Hadi Larijani
    • 3
  • Amir Hussain
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Natural SciencesUniversity of StirlingStirling, ScotlandUK
  2. 2.DICEAM, University Mediterranea of Reggio CalabriaReggio CalabriaItaly
  3. 3.School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgow, ScotlandUK

Personalised recommendations