Advertisement

Remote Sensing for Natural or Man-Made Disasters and Environmental Changes

  • Alessandro NovellinoEmail author
  • Colm Jordan
  • Gisela Ager
  • Luke Bateson
  • Claire Fleming
  • Pierluigi Confuorto
Chapter
Part of the Springer Natural Hazards book series (SPRINGERNAT)

Abstract

Natural and man-made disasters have become an issue of growing concern throughout the world. The frequency and magnitude of disasters threatening large populations living in diverse environments, is rapidly increasing in recent years across the world due to demographic growth, inducing to urban sprawls into hazardous areas. These disasters also have far-reaching implications on sustainable development through social, economic and environmental impact. This chapter summarises three scientific contributions from relevant experiences of the British Geological Survey and the Federico II University of Naples, where remote sensing sensors have been playing a crucial role to potentially support disaster management studies in areas affected by natural hazards. The three cases are: the landslide inventory map of St. Lucia island, tsunami-induced damage along the Sendai coast (Japan) and the landslide geotechnical characterization in Papanice (Italy). For each case study we report the main issue, datasets available and results achieved. Finally, we analyse how recent developments and improved satellite and sensor technologies can support in overcoming the current limitations of using remotely sensed data in disaster management so to fully utilize the capabilities of remote sensing in disaster management and strength cooperation and collaboration between relevant stakeholders including end users.

Keywords

Earth observation Geohazards Landslide Tsunami 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication benefited from inputs and contributions from the following: D. Calcaterra, D. Di Martire, M. Ramondini (University of Naples) and Hussain E. (British Geological Survey). Thanks also to the editors of the special issue in which this chapter is published, for their guidance and patience. Data for the St. Lucia case study have been obtained through the ESA eoworld2 initiative.

References

  1. 1.
    Bello OM, Aina YA (2014) Satellite remote sensing as a tool in disaster management and sustainable development: towards a synergistic approach. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 120:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Confuorto P, Di Martire D, Centolanza G, Iglesias R, Mallorqui JJ, Novellino A, Plank S, Ramondini M, Thuro K, Calcaterra D (2017) Post-failure evolution analysis of a rainfall-triggered landslide by multi-temporal interferometry SAR approaches integrated with geotechnical analysis. Remote Sens Environ 188:51–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ESA (2016) Earth observation for sustainable development. Partnership Report, September 2016Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guha-Sapir D, Hoyois P, Wallemacq P, Below R (2016) Annual disaster statistical review 2016: the numbers and trends. CRED, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang K-T (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth Sci Rev 112(1–2):42–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jordan C, Grebby S, Dijkstra T, Dashwood C, Cigna F (2015) Risk information services for disaster risk management (drm) in the Caribbean: operational documentation. British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK, 69pp. (OR/15/001) (Unpublished)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaku K, Held A (2013) Sentinel Asia: a space-based disaster management support system in the Asia-Pacific region. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lary DJ, Alavi AH, Gandomi AH, Walker AL (2016) Machine learning in geosciences and remote sensing. Geosci Front 7(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Novellino A, Cigna F, Brahmi M, Sowter A, Bateson L, Marsh S (2017) Assessing the feasibility of a national InSAR ground deformation map of Great Britain with Sentinel-1. Geosciences 7(2):19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shimozono T, Sato S, Okayasu A, Tajima Y, Fritz HM, Liu H, Takagawa T (2012) Propagation and inundation characteristics of the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami on the Central Sanriku Coast. Coastal Eng J 54(1):1250004Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simons M, Minson SE, Sladen A, Ortega F, Jiang J, Owen SE, Meng L, Ampuero JP, Wei S, Chu R, Helmberger DV (2011) The 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: Mosaicking the megathrust from seconds to centuries. Science 332(6036):1421–1425Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tappin DR, Evans HM, Jordan CJ, Richmond B, Sugawara D, Goto K (2012) Coastal changes in the Sendai area from the impact of the 2011 Tōhoku-oki tsunami: interpretations of time series satellite images, helicopter-borne video footage and field observations. Sediment Geol 282:151–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams JG, Rosser NJ, Kincey ME, Benjamin J, Oven KJ, Densmore AL, Milledge DG, Robinson TR, Jordan CA, Dijkstra TA (2018) Satellite-based emergency mapping using optical imagery: experience and reflections from the 2015 Nepal earthquakes. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 18:185–205.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-185-2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wohletz K, Heiken G, Ander M, Goff F, Vuataz FD, Wadge G (1986) The Qualibou Caldera, St. Lucia, West Indies. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 27(1–2):77–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Novellino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Colm Jordan
    • 1
  • Gisela Ager
    • 1
  • Luke Bateson
    • 1
  • Claire Fleming
    • 1
  • Pierluigi Confuorto
    • 2
  1. 1.British Geological SurveyKeyworthUK
  2. 2.Federico II University of NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations