Skip to main content

The Rise in China’s Gender Income Inequality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The State of China’s State Capitalism

Abstract

This research aims to shed light on the causes of the rising gender income gap in China. We first apply the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method (Oaxaca, Int Eco Rev 14: 693–709, 1973; Blinder, J Hum Res 8: 436–455, 1973) to our survey data to estimate the extent to which that gap can be explained by the difference in human capital characteristics (such as years of education and years of experience). We find that a rising discrimination against females (either due to tradition or otherwise) is not the main cause of the rising gender income gap in China. Instead, we present evidence to propose that two of the three main drivers of China’s economic growth—namely, privatization and urbanization—very likely have contributed to the rise in China’s gender income gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See United Nations (2000–2001).

  2. 2.

    The problem of gender discrimination in income existed since the Industrial Revolution began in England in the eighteenth century. Male employees occupied the advantages of physical capacity so that they could obtain the majority of working opportunities and earn more wages (Nyhus and Pons 2012).

  3. 3.

    See Oaxaca (1973) and Blinder (1973) for the Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method.

  4. 4.

    Clark (2014) argued that, because working in the engineering industry contains some risks and dangers and also the working environment for engineering is relatively tough, a small number of female students will choose engineering as their major in universities and very few female students will continue to study further in this subject.

  5. 5.

    Reasons for segregation of occupations and sectors by gender have been attributable to both the supply side and the demand side in the literature. For example, on the supply side, under the traditional gender division of labor and social norms, women have to take up more responsibility of caring for the family. Therefore, many women take up jobs that are more flexible in working hours and/or less physically demanding despite being lower paid jobs. On the demand side, gender stereotypes or information asymmetry could lead to discrimination against women by employers.

  6. 6.

    See “China’s permanent urbanization rate hits 57.4 per cent” by Wenyu Sun (July 13, 2017). People’s Daily.

References

  • An, S. F. (2002), Study on the History and Status Quo of Higher Education of Chinese Women. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. S. (1973), “Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates”, Journal of Human Resources: 8(4), 436–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., (1957), Becker Discrimination Theory. Discrimination Economics. 1st ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, W, and Li, B. (2014), “Trends in China’s gender employment and pay gap: Estimating gender pay gaps with employment selection”, Journal of Comparative Economics: 42(3), 708–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinese Family Panel Studies. (2011), Published by the Institute of Social Science Survey (ISSS) of Peking University, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N.R. (2014), “Of people, politics and profit: the political economy of Chinese industrial zone development”, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, W. (1999), “Tremendous Changes in Chinese Families in the Fifty Years since the Foundation of People’s Republic of China.” Study & Exploration: 6(16).

    Google Scholar 

  • The global gender gap report. (2011), published by the World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, E., and Zhu, R. (2012), “Gender wage differentials among rural–urban migrants in China”, Regional Science and Urban Economics: 42, Special issue on “Migration and Development”, 779–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J., and Polachek, S. (1974), “Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women”, Journal of Political Economy: 2, S76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhus, E., and Pons, E. (2012), “Personality and the gender wage gap”, Applied Economics: 44(1), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca, R. (1973), “Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets”. International Economic Review: 14(3), 693–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seguino, S. (2002), “Gender, Quality of Life, And Growth in Asia 1970-90”, The Pacific Review: 15(2), 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2001), “The World’s Women 2000: Trends and Statistics”, New York. Women in Action, 61–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juann H. Hung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Appendix 1: The Female-to-Male Ratio of Estimated Earned Income in Asia and Europe, 2011

Asia

Europe

Country

Ratio

Country

Ratio

Brunei Darussalam

0.97

Norway

1

Singapore

0.88

Luxembourg

1

Australia

0.82

Switzerland

0.89

Mongolia

0.8

Netherlands

0.83

New Zealand

0.7

Sweden

0.82

Vietnam

0.69

Denmark

0.81

Cambodia

0.66

Finland

0.74

China

0.65

Ireland

0.72

Thailand

0.63

United Kingdom

0.71

Philippines

0.6

Croatia

0.7

Maldives

0.57

Iceland

0.69

Bangladesh

0.55

Germany

0.69

Japan

0.51

Romania

0.68

Malaysia

0.43

Belgium

0.67

Indonesia

0.42

Latvia

0.67

Korea, Rep.

0.41

Lithuania

0.67

Iran, Islamic Rep .

0.4

Moldova

0.67

Fiji

0.38

Bulgaria

0.66

Nepal

0.37

Russian Federation

0.65

Sri Lanka

0.36

France

0.65

India

0.31

Hungary

0.64

Average

0.58

Slovenia

0.62

  

Estonia

0.62

  

Ukraine

0.6

  

Cyprus

0.58

  

Spain

0.57

  

Portugal

0.57

  

Poland

0.57

  

Slovak Republic

0.57

  

Austria

0.56

  

Italy

0.54

  

Albania

0.54

  

Macedonia, FYR

0.51

  

Greece

0.5

  

Armenia

0.5

  

Czech Republic

0.48

  

Malta

0.47

  

Georgia

0.39

  

Average

0.65

  1. Data Source: The Global Gender Gap Report (2011)

1.2 Appendix 2: Ranking of Countries by Female-to-Male Earned Income Ratio

 

Female-to-Male

 

Country

Ratio

Rank

Luxembourg

1

1

Norway

1

1

Brunei Darussalam

0.97

3

Switzerland

0.89

4

United States

0.88

5

Singapore

0.88

6

Qatar

0.84

7

Netherlands

0.83

8

Sweden

0.82

9

Australia

0.82

10

Denmark

0.81

11

Mongolia

0.8

12

Burundi

0.8

13

Bolivia

0.77

14

Mozambique

0.76

15

Canada

0.75

16

Ghana

0.75

17

Finland

0.74

18

Lesotho

0.74

19

Malawi

0.73

20

Madagascar

0.73

21

Ireland

0.72

22

United Kingdom

0.71

23

Croatia

0.7

24

New Zealand

0.7

25

Iceland

0.69

26

Ethiopia

0.69

27

Germany

0.69

28

Vietnam

0.69

29

Romania

0.68

30

Lithuania

0.67

31

Belgium

0.67

32

Latvia

0.67

33

Tanzania

0.67

34

Moldova

0.67

35

Burkina Faso

0.67

36

Benin

0.66

37

Cambodia

0.66

38

Bulgaria

0.66

39

Kenya

0.66

40

Uganda

0.65

41

Russian Federation

0.65

42

China

0.65

43

Angola

0.65

44

France

0.65

45

Barbados

0.64

46

Israel

0.64

47

Hungary

0.64

48

Namibia

0.64

49

Gambia

0.64

50

Thailand

0.63

51

Estonia

0.62

52

Slovenia

0.62

53

Kuwait

0.61

54

Paraguay

0.61

55

Kazakhstan

0.61

56

Chad

0.61

57

Brazil

0.61

58

Ukraine

0.6

59

Philippines

0.6

60

Peru

0.59

61

Jamaica

0.58

62

Cyprus

0.58

63

Spain

0.57

64

Poland

0.57

65

Senegal

0.57

66

Slovak Republic

0.57

67

Maldives

0.57

68

Portugal

0.57

69

Tajikistan

0.57

70

Mauritania

0.56

71

Zambia

0.56

72

Austria

0.56

73

South Africa

0.56

74

Bahrain

0.56

75

Uruguay

0.56

76

United Arab Emirates

0.55

77

Costa Rica

0.55

78

Trinidad and Tobago

0.55

79

Bangladesh

0.55

80

Panama

0.55

81

Albania

0.54

82

Italy

0.54

83

Kyrgyz Republic

0.53

84

Azerbaijan

0.53

85

Argentina

0.52

86

Japan

0.51

87

Cameroon

0.51

88

Macedonia

0.51

89

Greece

0.5

90

  1. Data Source: The Global Gender Gap Report (2011)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sun, Q., Hung, J.H. (2018). The Rise in China’s Gender Income Inequality. In: Hung, J., Chen, Y. (eds) The State of China’s State Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0983-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0983-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0982-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0983-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics