Skip to main content

Forecasting the Carbon Price in China Pilot Emission Trading Scheme: A Structural Time Series Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The State of China’s State Capitalism
  • 639 Accesses

Abstract

To curb carbon emission, the Chinese pilot carbon emission trading markets were implemented in 2013 to act as a testbed for the official establishment of national carbon market in 2017. As the potential largest carbon trading market in the world, finding the key factors that drive the carbon permit prices and forecasting its future prices are important for both investors and government. This study explores the prospect of forecasting the carbon permit price in three pilot markets (Beijing, Shanghai, and Shenzhen) using the structural time series modeling (STSM) approach. The result shows that this modeling approach potentially outperforms conventional time series model in forecasting capability. Statistically, the prices of energy sources are found to be uncorrelated with the permit prices in the Chinese pilot market, in contrary to the results from other studies on the European Union carbon market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The first pilot market started in Shenzhen in June 2013 followed by Shanghai and Beijing in November of the same year. When this preliminary analysis of the carbon markets was conducted in 2014–15, these three cities recorded the most complete time series dataset. Guangdong started its pilot market in December 2013 but since it is a provincial state, we do not include it in this study.

  2. 2.

    Note that due to the complexity of the Chinese ETS design, the lack of micro-data, and the infancy stage of development of the ETS market at the time when this study was conducted, the analysis is simply exploratory and does not attempt to demonstrate any forms of causality.

  3. 3.

    Besides carbon dioxide, the ETS system has also been implemented to reduce other greenhouse gas emission such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 in the US and nitrogen oxides (NO2) in eastern US. Schmalensee and Stavins (2017) provided a recent survey on other ETS markets including the EU ETS.

  4. 4.

    For a survey, see for instance Martin et al. (2016) which focuses on how regulated firms have reacted to the EU ETS.

  5. 5.

    The Brent oil price was used by Koop and Tole (2013) in forecasting the carbon price in European carbon market.

  6. 6.

    The Augmented Dickey-Fuller tests show that the logarithm of carbon price for Shenzhen and Shanghai is significant at 5% and 1% level, respectively, implying that the data are stationary while the price of carbon permit in Beijing has a unit root. Within the price energy sources, only the logarithm of oil price is significant at 10% level (evidence of stationarity) while the logarithm of coal and gas prices is non-stationary time series.

References

  • Aatola, P., Ollikainen, M., and Toppinen, A. (2013), “Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals”, Energy Economics: 36, 380–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aichele, R., and Felbermayr, G. (2013), “The Effect of the Kyoto Protocol on Carbon Emissions”, Journal of Policy Analysis & Management: 32, 731–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B., and Di Maria, C. (2011), “Abatement and allocation in the pilot phase of the EU ETS”, Environmental and Resource Economics: 48, 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bo, K., and Freeman, C. (2013), “Making Sense of Carbon Market Development in China”, Carbon & Climate Law Review: 7, 194–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boersen, A., and Scholtens, B. (2014), “The relationship between European electricity markets and emission allowance futures prices in phase II of the EU (European Union) emission trading scheme”, Energy; 74, 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP. (2013), BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2013, BP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadstock, D. C., and Collins, A. (2010), “Measuring unobserved prices using the structural time-series model: The case of cycling”, Transportation Research Part A: 44, 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calel, R., and Dechezlepretre, A. (2013), “Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European carbon market”, Review of Economics and Statistics: 98, 173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C., and Alice, F. (2009), “The Economic and Financial Determinants of Carbon Prices”, Finance a Uver: Czech Journal of Economics & Finance: 59, 396–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier, J. (2011), “A model of carbon price interactions with macroeconomic and energy dynamics”, Energy Economics, 33, 1295–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, A. C., Arvanitakis, A., Tangen, K., and Hasselknippe, H. (2005), “Price determinants in the EU emissions trading scheme”. Climate Policy, 5, 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantini, V., and Mazzanti. M. (2012), “On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports”, Research Policy: 41, 132–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, L. B., Fan, Y., Zhu, L., and Bi, Q. H. (2014), “How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target?” Applied Energy, 1043–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declercq, B., Delarue, E., and D’haeseleer, W. (2011), “Impact of the economic recession on the European power sector’s CO2 emissions”. Energy Policy, 39, 1677–1686. Available at: doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilaver, Z. (2010), “OECD-Europe natural gas demand: An outlook to 2020. In: SEEC (Surrey Energy Economics Centre)”, 8th BIEE Academic Conference. Oxford, U.K, 22–23 September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frunza, M.-C., Guégan, D., and Lassoudiere, A. (2010), “Forecasting Strategies for Carbon Allowances Prices: From Classic Arbitrage Pricing Theory to Switching Regimes”. International Review of Applied Financial Issues & Economics, 2, 576–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. D. (1994), Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, G., Olsson, M., Hallding, K., and Lunsford, D. (2012), “China’s Carbon Emission Trading: An Overview of Current Development”. FORES (Forum for Reforms, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. C. (1989), Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, A. C., and Shephard, N. (1993), “Structural time series models”, in Handbook of Statistics (Eds) G. S. Maddala, C. R. Rao, and H. D. Vinod, Elsevier Science Publishers B V, Amsterdam, 261–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintermann, B. (2010), “Allowance price drivers in the first phase of the EU ETS”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59, 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübler, M., Voigt, S., Löschel, A. (2014), “Designing an emissions trading scheme for China—an up-to-date climate policy assessment”. Energy Policy, 75, 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, M., and Greenidge, K. (2010), “Modelling and forecasting tourist flows to Barbados using structural time series models”. Tourism & Hospitality Research, 10, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J. J., Ye, B., and Ma, X. M. (2014), The construction of Shenzhen’s carbon emission trading scheme. Energy Policy, 75, 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jotzo, F. and Löschel, A. (2014), “Emissions trading in China: Emerging experiences and international lessons”. Energy Policy, 75, 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. S., and Koo, W. W. (2010), “Factors affecting the carbon allowance market in the US”. Energy Policy, 38, 1879–1884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koop, G., and Tole, L. (2013), “Forecasting the European carbon market”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 176, 723–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourentzes, N., Petropoulos, F., and Trapero, J. R. (2014), “Improving forecasting by estimating time series structural components across multiple frequencies”. International Journal of Forecasting, 30, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. R., Ghosh, B., and Broderick, B. (2011), “Prediction of traffic-related nitrogen oxides concentrations using Structural Time-Series models”. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 4719–4727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Kou, Q., Cai, S., (2014), “The economic impact of carbon pricing with regulated electricity prices in China—an application of a Computable General Equilibrium approach”. Energy Policy, 75, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. W., Zong, H. J., Zhao, E. D., Chen, C. X., and Wang, J. Z. (2014), “Can China realize its carbon emission reduction goal in 2020: From the perspective of thermal power development”. Applied Energy, 124, 199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Guan, D., Crawford-Brown, D., Zhang, Q., He, K., and Liu, J. (2013), “Energy policy: A low-carbon road map for China”. Nature, 500, 143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansanet-Bataller, M., Pardo, A., and Valor, E. (2007), “CO2 Prices, Energy and Weather”. Energy Journal, 28, 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Muuls, M., and Wagner, U. (2011), Climate change, investment and carbon markets and prices-evidence from manager interviews. Climate Strategies, Carbon Pricing for Low-Carbon Investment Project. Available at: http://climatestrategies.org/publication/climate-change-investment-and-carbon-markets-and-prices-evidence-from-manager-interviews/

  • Martin, R., Muuls, M., and Wagner, U. (2016), “The Impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on Regulated Firms: What Is the Evidence after Ten Years?”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10, 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Ralf, de Preux, Laure B. and Wagner, Ulrich J. (2014), “Industry compensation under relocation risk: A firm-level analysis of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme”. American Economic Review, 104, 2482–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maydybura, A., and Andrew, B. (2011), “A Study of the Determinants of Emissions Unit Allowance Price in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme”. Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 5, 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michieka, N. M., Fletcher, J., and Burnett, W. (2013), “An empirical analysis of the role of China’s exports on CO2 emissions”. Applied Energy, 104, 258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myklebust, J., Tomasgard, A., and Westgaard, S. (2010), “Forecasting gas component prices with multivariate structural time series models”. OPEC Energy Review, 34, 82–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. G., Pizer, W. A., and Raimi, D. (2013), “Carbon Markets 15 Years after Kyoto: Lessons Learned”, New Challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. P., Weber, C. L., Guan, D., and Hubacek, K. (2007), “China’s growing CO2 emissions–a race between increasing consumption and efficiency gains”. Environmental Science & Technology. 41, 1895–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, S., Wang, B., Zhang, J. (2014), “Policy design of the Hubei ETS Pilot in China”. Energy Policy, 75, 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, S., and Schneider, F. (2013), “Political barriers of implementing carbon markets in Japan: A Public Choice analysis and the empirical evidence before and after the Fukushima nuclear disaster”. Environmental Economics & Policy Studies, 15, 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEI. (2012), China’s Carbon Emission Trading: An Experiment to Watch Closely’. Available at: http://www.sei-international.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/china-cluster/SEI-PB-2012-China-carbon-markets.pdf

  • Schmalensee, R., and Stavins, R. (2017), “Lessons Learned from Three Decades of Experience with Cap and Trade”, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. P., Thakur A. K. and Ram D. S. (2014), “Application of Structural Time Series model for forecasting Gram production in India”. American International Journal of Research in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teng, F., Wang, X., Zhiqiang, L. V. (2014), “Introducing the emissions trading system to China’s electricity sector: challenges and opportunities”. Energy Policy, 75, 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., Dai, H. C., Ren, S. Y., Zhao, D. Q., and Masui, T. (2015), “Achieving Copenhagen target through carbon emission trading: Economic impacts assessment in Guangdong Province of China”. Energy, 212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, R., Liu, W., Xiao, L., Liu, J., and Kao, W. (2011), “Viewpoint: Path towards achieving of China’s 2020 carbon emission reduction target—A discussion of low-carbon energy policies at province level”. Energy Policy, 39, 2740–2747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., Quian, H., Li, J., (2014), “Advancing the experiment to reality: perspectives on Shanghai pilot carbon emissions trading scheme”. Energy Policy, 75, 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, Y. A. N., Fan, Y., and Wu, J. I. E. (2013), “Analysis of low-carbon production chains towards China’s emission reduction targets for 2020”. Singapore Economic Review, 58, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, S. C., He, Z. X., and Long, R. Y. (2014), “Factors that influence carbon emissions due to energy consumption in China: Decomposition analysis using LMDI”. Applied Energy, 127, 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. J., Wang, A. D. and Da, Y. B. (2014), “Regional allocation of carbon emission quotas in China: Evidence from the Shapley value method”. Energy Policy, 74, 454–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., Yang, Y., and Suo, C. (2014), “Beijing energy consumption carbon emission characteristics and cause analysis”. Journal of Chemical & Pharmaceutical Research, 6, 473–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, B., and Wei, Y. (2013), “Carbon price forecasting with a novel hybrid ARIMA and least squares support vector machines methodology”. Omega, 41, 517–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soo Keong Yong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mengdi, Z., Yong, S.K. (2018). Forecasting the Carbon Price in China Pilot Emission Trading Scheme: A Structural Time Series Approach. In: Hung, J., Chen, Y. (eds) The State of China’s State Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0983-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0983-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0982-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0983-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics