Skip to main content

A Strategic Rethink on Pension Reforms in China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Annual Report on Financing Old Age Care in China (2017)
  • 390 Accesses

Abstract

China’s population is ageing quickly, and its current pension system is facing many significant challenges and institutional drawbacks caused by the failure of the system to clearly define government, corporate and individual responsibilities. At the core of China’s pension reform is the three-pillar design with Chinese characteristics: basic public pension based on the social pooling account (pillar 1); the occupational pension system consisting of financing deficit in the individual account by transferred state-owned assets, enterprise annuities and occupational annuities (pillar 2); and voluntarily contributed pension plans based on personal choice (pillar 3), supported by tax concessions. The government has overall responsibility for system establishment, service management and funding of Pillar I, and plays a regulatory role in system establishment and operation of the 2nd and 3rd pillar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    China’s social security contributions include pension fund (employer at a rate of 20% and employee at a rate of 8%), medical insurance fund (employer at a rate of 10% and employee at a rate of 2%), unemployment insurance fund (employer at a rate of 1% and employee at a rate of 0.2%), maternity insurance fund (employer at a rate of 0.8%) and work-related injury insurance fund (employer at a rate of 0.5%) as well as the housing provident fund (employer at a rate of 8% and employee at a rate of 8%).

  2. 2.

    OECD, Pension at glance 2013

  3. 3.

    Including SOE shares held by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC), the Ministry of Finance, and local state-owned assets supervision and administration commissions, including H shares listed in overseas markets and some red chips. Source: Public information.

  4. 4.

    Wu et al. (2011).

  5. 5.

    The replacement rate has different definition. It may refer to the ratio of the average pension benefits to the average wage or the ratio of individual pension benefits to pre-retirement wage. In the study of Wu Zhong, the replacement rate refers to the ratio of pension benefits to contribution base, which is consistent with the level of pension benefits in the study.

References

  • Sun, B., Dong. K., and Tang. Y. (2011). Impact of the adjustment of family planning policy on the pension gap. Population and Economy, (2011) 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X. (2013). Collection of articles on the investment of social security funds, Beijing: China Financial Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. (1998). Review of China’s social security reform. Economic Forum, (1998) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Lu, Z., and Ye, K. (2010). Labor force participation rate and labor force growth: 1982–2005. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (2010) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Task force of the Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. (2009). The employment situation in the context of financial crisis. Domestic and Foreign Economic Developments, (2009) 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, F. (2007) Problems brought by China’s family planning policy. Far Eastern Economic Review, (2007) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Zhang, P., and Han, L. (2011). Cost and benefit estimation of enterprise annuities in the context of China’s preferential policy based on specific target replacement rate. Journal of Shanghai University of Engineering Science, (2011) 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E.P. (1998). Pension Fund reform and European financial markets[C]. LSE Financial Markets Group Special Paper, 107(10):21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E.P and Steil, B. (2001) Institutional Investors [M]. MIT Press. 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Social Sciences Academic Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dong, K. (2018). A Strategic Rethink on Pension Reforms in China. In: Dong, K., Yao, Y. (eds) Annual Report on Financing Old Age Care in China (2017). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0968-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics