Skip to main content

Distinguishing Two Different Mental States of Human Thought Using Soft Computing Approaches

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Intelligence and Signal Analysis

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 748))

Abstract

Electroencephalograph (EEG) is useful modality nowadays which is utilized to capture cognitive activities in the form of a signal representing the potential for a given period. Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) systems are one of the practical application of EEG signal. Response to mental task is a well-known type of BCI systems which augments the life of disabled persons to communicate their core needs to machines that can able to distinguish among mental states corresponding to thought responses to the EEG. The success of classification of these mental tasks depends on the pertinent set formation of features (analysis, extraction, and selection) of the EEG signals for the classification process. In the recent past, a filter-based heuristic technique, Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD), is employed to analyze EEG signal. EMD is a mathematical technique which is suitable to analyze a nonstationary and nonlinear signal such as EEG. In this work, three-stage feature set formation from EEG signal for building classification model is suggested to distinguish different mental states. In the first stage, the signal is broken into a number of oscillatory functions through EMD algorithm. The second stage involves compact representation in terms of eight different statistics (features) obtained from each oscillatory function. It has also observed that not all features are relevant, therefore, there is need to select most relevant features from the pool of the formed features which is carried out in the third stage. Four well-known univariate feature selection algorithms are investigated in combination with EMD algorithm for forming the feature vectors for further classification. Classification is carried out with help of learning the support vector machine (SVM) classification model. Experimental result on a publicly available dataset shows the superior performance of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.cs.colostate.edu/eeg

References

  1. Anderson, C.W., Stolz, E.A., Shamsunder, S.: Multivariate autoregressive models for classification of spontaneous electroencephalographic signals during mental tasks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45(3), 277–286 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babiloni, F., Cincotti, F., Lazzarini, L., Millan, J., Mourino, J., Varsta, M., Heikkonen, J., Bianchi, L., Marciani, M.: Linear classification of low-resolution eeg patterns produced by imagined hand movements. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8(2), 186–188 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M., Ward, R.K., Birch, G.E.: A survey of signal processing algorithms in brain-computer interfaces based on electrical brain signals. J. Neural Eng. 4(2), R32 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennasar, M., Hicks, Y., Setchi, R.: Feature selection using joint mutual information maximisation. Expert Syst. Appl. 42(22), 8520–8532 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Derrac, J., García, S., Molina, D., Herrera, F.: A practical tutorial on the use of nonparametric statistical tests as a methodology for comparing evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms. Swarm Evol. Comput. 1(1), 3–18 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diez, P.F., Torres, A., Avila, E., Laciar, E., Mut, V.: Classification of Mental Tasks Using Different Spectral Estimation Methods. INTECH Open Access Publisher (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dowdy, S., Wearden, S., Chilko, D.: Statistics for Research, vol. 512. Wiley, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faradji, F., Ward, R.K., Birch, G.E.: Plausibility assessment of a 2-state self-paced mental task-based bci using the no-control performance analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 180(2), 330–339 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedman, M.: The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 32(200), 675–701 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta, A., Agrawal, R., Kaur, B.: Performance enhancement of mental task classification using eeg signal: a study of multivariate feature selection methods. Soft Comput. 19(10), 2799–2812 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, A., Kirar, J.S.: A novel approach for extracting feature from eeg signal for mental task classification. 2015 International Conference on Computing and Network Communications (CoCoNet), pp. 829–832. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guyon, I., Elisseeff, A.: An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 1157–1182 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, N.E., Shen, Z., Long, S.R., Wu, M.C., Shih, H.H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.C., Tung, C.C., Liu, H.H.: The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. (1971) 454, 903–995 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kauhanen, L., Nykopp, T., Lehtonen, J., Jylanki, P., Heikkonen, J., Rantanen, P., Alaranta, H., Sams, M.: Eeg and meg brain-computer interface for tetraplegic patients. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 14(2), 190–193 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keirn, Z.A., Aunon, J.I.: A new mode of communication between man and his surroundings. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37(12), 1209–1214 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kohavi, R., John, G.H.: Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif. Intell. 97(1), 273–324 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, S., Wu, X., Tan, M.: Gene selection using hybrid particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm. Soft Comput. 12(11), 1039–1048 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pearson, K.: Notes on the history of correlation. Biometrika, 25–45 (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pfurtscheller, G., Neuper, C., Schlogl, A., Lugger, K.: Separability of eeg signals recorded during right and left motor imagery using adaptive autoregressive parameters. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 6(3), 316–325 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication (urbana, il) (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom. Bull. 1(6), 80–83 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors express their gratitude to Cognitive Science Research Initiative (CSRI), DST & DBT, Govt. of India & CSIR, India for obtained research grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akshansh Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gupta, A., Kumar, D., Chakraborti, A., Kumar Singh, V. (2019). Distinguishing Two Different Mental States of Human Thought Using Soft Computing Approaches. In: Tanveer, M., Pachori, R. (eds) Machine Intelligence and Signal Analysis. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 748. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0923-6_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics