Skip to main content

The Conceptual Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 562 Accesses

Part of the book series: Translational Systems Sciences ((TSS,volume 15))

Abstract

A set of generic thinking tools is required to understand and develop a concept. New concepts are always built upon existing knowledge bases. In this chapter, we discuss various generic thinking tools used for designing and developing the concept of Service Machine. As a service production system designer, one should understand various definitions of services, the concepts of systems and systems thinking to visualize different abstraction levels of a system from micro to macro, and relevant emerging technologies. Technology means a systematic and purposeful attempt to accomplish something based on knowledge about the underlying phenomena, be they natural, biological, or social. Knowledge has three aspects: ontology, epistemology, and dynamics. With knowledge, technologies can be developed. Service machine is proposed as a conceptual tool for understanding the way service production system is organized in a business. A service machine should be designed using socio-technical approach in order to achieve higher productivity and satisfaction of stakeholders. We also discuss how the service machines are related to the existing concept of Business Model Canvas (BMC). This would be helpful in improving existing services and creating new service businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baek, J. S., Kim, S., Pahk, Y., & Manzini, E. (2017). A sociotechnical framework for the design of collaborative services. Design Studies, 55, 54–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016). Competing against luck: The story of innovation and customer choice (Latest edition). New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, J. A., & Fitzsimmons, M. J. (2010). Service management: Operations, strategy, information technology (7th Rev. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, T. P. (1977). On goods and services. Review of Income and Wealth, 23(4), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2011). Factory physics (3rd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Pr Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loudon, K. C., & Loudon, J. P. (2015). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (14th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillrank, P. (2018). The logics of healthcare: The professional’s guide to health systems science (1st ed.). Milton, UK: Productivity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillrank, P., Groop, P. J., & Malmström, T. J. (2010). Demand and supply–based operating modes – A framework for analyzing health care service production. Milbank Quarterly, 88(4), 595–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, S. (2010). Characteristics of services – A new approach uncovers their value. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(5), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011060468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & others. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach. Doctoral dissertation. Lausanne, Switzerland: University of Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, S. E., & Froehle, C. M. (2006). Foundations and implications of a proposed unified services theory. Production and Operations Management, 15(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2006.tb00248.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner, R. W. (2004). Service businesses and productivity. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wemmerlöv, U. (1990). A taxonomy for service processes and its implications for system design. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 1(3), 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, V., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. (2012). Services marketing (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roy, R.B., Lillrank, P., V.K., S., Torkki, P. (2019). The Conceptual Tools. In: Designing Service Machines. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 15. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0917-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics