Abstract
During most common applications, the signals produced by cortical dipoles are detected at the scalp level. While these measurements can be highly informative and feature optimal temporal resolution, their spatial detection is hindered by the conduction through the tissues of the head. A deeper understanding of cortical sources can be provided by source imaging techniques. These methods first create mathematical models of the head, assigning appropriate properties to each layer. Brain activity is then calculated based on these assigned models and the observed EEG measurements, greatly improving the spatial resolution of EEG measurement and providing insights regarding otherwise hidden cortical dynamics. Source Imaging approaches can be further enhanced by integrating a second imaging modality. This is particularly useful with imaging methods that feature high spatial resolution or whose signals are not blurred by transduction. In the following chapter, we provide a detailed introduction to the general principles and basic algorithms of source imaging techniques. The discussion then expands to explore how other modalities can interact with these techniques to improve our results. At its conclusion, readers should have a good idea on how EEG data can be expanded to provide cortical insight.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
S.P. Ahlfors, J. Han, J.W. Belliveau, M.S. Hämäläinen, Sensitivity of MEG and EEG to source orientation. Brain Topogr. 23(3), 227–232 (2010)
S. Ahn, S.C. Jun, Multi-modal integration of EEG-fNIRS for brain-computer interfaces–current limitations and future directions. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 503 (2017)
T. Aihara, Y. Takeda, K. Takeda et al., Cortical current source estimation from electroencephalography in combination with near-infrared spectroscopy as a hierarchical prior. Neuroimage 59(4), 4006–4021 (2012)
A. Babajani-Feremi, H. Soltanian-Zadeh, Multi-area neural mass modeling of EEG and MEG signals. Neuroimage 52(3), 793–811 (2010)
A. Babajani, H. Soltanian-Zadeh, Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53(9), 1794–1801 (2006)
F. Babiloni, D. Mattia, C. Babiloni et al., Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle. Magn. Reson. Imaging 22(10), 1471–1476 (2004)
S. Baillet, J.C. Mosher, R.M. Leahy, Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18(6), 14–30 (2001)
S.B. Baumann, D.R. Wozny, S.K. Kelly, F.M. Meno, The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44(3), 220–223 (1997)
A.J. Bell, T.J. Sejnowski, An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 7(6), 1129–1159 (1995)
A. Bradley, J. Yao, J. Dewald, C.-P. Richter, Evaluation of electroencephalography source localization algorithms with multiple cortical sources. PLoS ONE 11(1), e0147266 (2016)
M. Breakspear, Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity. Nat. Neurosci. 20(3), 340 (2017)
M.J. Brookes, C.M. Stevenson, G.R. Barnes et al., Beamformer reconstruction of correlated sources using a modified source model. Neuroimage 34(4), 1454–1465 (2007)
R.B. Buxton, E.C. Wong, L.R. Frank, Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn. Reson. Med. 39(6), 855–864 (1998)
R.B. Buxton, K. Uludağ, D.J. Dubowitz, T.T. Liu, Modeling the hemodynamic response to brain activation. Neuroimage 23, S220–S233 (2004)
V.D. Calhoun, T. Adali, G. Pearlson, K. Kiehl, Neuronal chronometry of target detection: fusion of hemodynamic and event-related potential data. Neuroimage 30(2), 544–553 (2006)
D. Cohen, B.N. Cuffin, Demonstration of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 56(1), 38–51 (1983)
A.M. Dale, M.I. Sereno, Improved localizadon of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 5(2), 162–176 (1993)
A.M. Dale, B. Fischl, M.I. Sereno, Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9(2), 179–194 (1999)
A.M. Dale, A.K. Liu, B.R. Fischl et al., Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26(1), 55–67 (2000)
J. Daunizeau, C. Grova, J. Mattout et al., Assessing the relevance of fMRI-based prior in the EEG inverse problem: a Bayesian model comparison approach. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 53(9), 3461–3472 (2005)
J. Daunizeau, C. Grova, G. Marrelec et al., Symmetrical event-related EEG/fMRI information fusion in a variational Bayesian framework. Neuroimage 36(1), 69–87 (2007)
B.G. Edwards, V.D. Calhoun, K.A. Kiehl, Joint ICA of ERP and fMRI during error-monitoring. Neuroimage 59(2), 1896–1903 (2012)
S. Fazli, J. Mehnert, J. Steinbrink et al., Enhanced performance by a hybrid NIRS–EEG brain computer interface. Neuroimage 59(1), 519–529 (2012)
B. Fischl, A. Liu, A.M. Dale, Automated manifold surgery: constructing geometrically accurate and topologically correct models of the human cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20(1), 70–80 (2001)
B. Fischl, D.H. Salat, E. Busa et al., Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33(3), 341–355 (2002)
J.M. Ford, B.J. Roach, V.A. Palzes, D.H. Mathalon, Using concurrent EEG and fMRI to probe the state of the brain in schizophrenia. NeuroImage-Clin. 12, 429–441 (2016)
K. Friston, L. Harrison, J. Daunizeau et al., Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem. Neuroimage 39(3), 1104–1120 (2008)
K. Friston, C. Chu, J. Mourão-Miranda et al., Bayesian decoding of brain images. Neuroimage 39(1), 181–205 (2008)
K.J. Friston, W. Penny, C. Phillips et al., Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: theory. Neuroimage 16(2), 465–483 (2002)
M. Fuchs, M. Wagner, J. Kastner, Boundary element method volume conductor models for EEG source reconstruction. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112(8), 1400–1407 (2001)
L. Geddes, L. Baker, The specific resistance of biological material—a compendium of data for the biomedical engineer and physiologist. Med. Biol. Eng. 5(3), 271–293 (1967)
G.H. Golub, M. Heath, G. Wahba, Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21(2), 215–223 (1979)
S.I. Gonçalves, J.C. de Munck, J.P. Verbunt et al., In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 50(6), 754–767 (2003)
R.L. Goris, T. Putzeys, J. Wagemans, F.A. Wichmann, A neural population model for visual pattern detection. Psychol. Rev. 120(3), 472 (2013)
R. Grech, T. Cassar, J. Muscat et al., Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 5(1), 25 (2008)
D. Gutiérrez, A. Nehorai, C.H. Muravchik, Estimating brain conductivities and dipole source signals with EEG arrays. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51(12), 2113–2122 (2004)
M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari, R.J. Ilmoniemi et al., Magnetoencephalography—theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65(2), 413 (1993)
H. Hallez, B. Vanrumste, R. Grech et al., Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis. J. NeuroEng. Rehabil. 4(1), 46 (2007)
M.S. Hamalainen, Interpreting Measured Magnetic Fields of the Brain: Estimates of Current Distributions (Helsinki University of Technology, Rep, 1984)
Hansen PC (1999) The L-curve and its use in the numerical treatment of inverse problems
O. Hauk, D.G. Wakeman, R. Henson, Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics. Neuroimage 54(3), 1966–1974 (2011)
R.J. Huster, S. Debener, T. Eichele, C.S. Herrmann, Methods for simultaneous EEG-fMRI: an introductory review. J. Neurosci. 32(18), 6053–6060 (2012)
B.H. Jansen, V.G. Rit, Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biol. Cybern. 73(4), 357–366 (1995)
J. Jorge, W. Van der Zwaag, P. Figueiredo, EEG–fMRI integration for the study of human brain function. Neuroimage 102, 24–34 (2014)
Y. Lai, W. Van Drongelen, L. Ding et al., Estimation of in vivo human brain-to-skull conductivity ratio from simultaneous extra-and intra-cranial electrical potential recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116(2), 456–465 (2005)
X. Lei, C. Qiu, P. Xu, D. Yao, A parallel framework for simultaneous EEG/fMRI analysis: methodology and simulation. Neuroimage 52(3), 1123–1134 (2010)
X. Lei, D. Ostwald, J. Hu et al., Multimodal functional network connectivity: an EEG-fMRI fusion in network space. PLoS ONE 6(9), e24642 (2011)
R. Li, T. Potter, W. Huang, Y. Zhang, Enhancing performance of a hybrid EEG-fNIRS system using channel selection and early temporal features. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 462 (2017)
A.K. Liu, J.W. Belliveau, A.M. Dale, Spatiotemporal imaging of human brain activity using functional MRI constrained magnetoencephalography data: Monte Carlo simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95(15), 8945–8950 (1998)
Y. Liu, Y. Ning, S. Li et al., Three-dimensional innervation zone imaging from multi-channel surface EMG recordings. Int. J. Neural Syst. 25(06), 1550024 (2015)
Z. Liu, F. Kecman, B. He, Effects of fMRI–EEG mismatches in cortical current density estimation integrating fMRI and EEG: a simulation study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117(7), 1610–1622 (2006)
Z. Liu, B. He, fMRI–EEG integrated cortical source imaging by use of time-variant spatial constraints. Neuroimage 39(3), 1198–1214 (2008)
M. Luessi, S.D. Babacan, R. Molina et al., Bayesian symmetrical EEG/fMRI fusion with spatially adaptive priors. Neuroimage 55(1), 113–132 (2011)
J. Malmivuo, R. Plonsey, Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields (Oxford University Press, USA, 1995)
E. Martınez-Montes, P.A. Valdés-Sosa, F. Miwakeichi et al., Concurrent EEG/fMRI analysis by multiway partial least squares. NeuroImage 22(3), 1023–1034 (2004)
T. Medani, D. Lautru, D. Schwartz et al., FEM method for the EEG forward problem and improvement based on modification of the saint venant’s method. Prog Electromagn Res 153, 11–22 (2015)
J.W. Meijs, O.W. Weier, M.J. Peters, A. Van Oosterom, On the numerical accuracy of the boundary element method (EEG application). IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36(10), 1038–1049 (1989)
M.M. Monti, Statistical analysis of fMRI time-series: a critical review of the GLM approach. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 28 (2011)
M. Moosmann, T. Eichele, H. Nordby et al., Joint independent component analysis for simultaneous EEG–fMRI: principle and simulation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 67(3), 212–221 (2008)
T. Nguyen, T. Potter, T. Nguyen, et al., EEG source imaging guided by spatiotemporal specific fMRI: toward an understanding of dynamic cognitive processes. Neural Plast. (2016)
T. Nguyen, T. Potter, R. Grossman, Y. Zhang, Characterization of dynamic changes of current source localization based on spatiotemporal fMRI constrained EEG source imaging. J. Neural Eng. (2017)
T.F. Oostendorp, J. Delbeke, D.F. Stegeman, The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47(11), 1487–1492 (2000)
D. Ostwald, C. Porcaro, A.P. Bagshaw, An information theoretic approach to EEG–fMRI integration of visually evoked responses. Neuroimage 49(1), 498–516 (2010)
R.D. Pascual-Marqui, C.M. Michel, D. Lehmann, Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 18(1), 49–65 (1994)
R.D. Pascual-Marqui, Review of methods for solving the EEG inverse problem. Int. J. Bioeletromagn. 1(1), 75–86 (1999)
R.D. Pascual-Marqui, Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 24(Suppl D), 5–12 (2002)
S. Peca, C.R. McCreary, E. Donaldson et al., Neurovascular decoupling is associated with severity of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology 81(19), 1659–1665 (2013)
Y. Peng, J. He, B. Yao et al., Motor unit number estimation based on high-density surface electromyography decomposition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 127(9), 3059–3065 (2016)
T.K. Perrachione, S.S. Ghosh, Optimized design and analysis of sparse-sampling FMRI experiments. Front. Neurosci. 7, 55 (2013)
S.E. Robinson, J. Vrba, Functional Neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM). Recent Advances in Biomagnetism (Tokyo University Press, Sendai, Japan, 1999), pp 302–305
M. Rosa, J. Daunizeau, K.J. Friston, EEG-fMRI integration: a critical review of biophysical modeling and data analysis approaches. J. Integr. Neurosci. 9(04), 453–476 (2010)
S. Rush, D.A. Driscoll, Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes. Anesth. Analg. 47(6), 717–723 (1968)
S. Rush, D.A. Driscoll, EEG electrode sensitivity-an application of reciprocity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1, 15–22 (1969)
Y. Salu, L.G. Cohen, D. Rose et al., An improved method for localizing electric brain dipoles. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37(7), 699–705 (1990)
U. Schridde, M. Khubchandani, J.E. Motelow et al., Negative BOLD with large increases in neuronal activity. Cereb. Cortex 18(8), 1814–1827 (2007)
K. Sekihara, S. Nagarajan, D. Poeppel, Y. Miyashita, Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources from magnetoencephalographic data using a vector beamformer, in Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2001 Proceedings (ICASSP’01) 2001 IEEE International Conference on 2021–2024 (2001)
D. Sharon, M.S. Hämäläinen, R.B. Tootell et al., The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex. Neuroimage 36(4), 1225–1235 (2007)
K. Uutela, M. Hamalainen, R. Salmelin, Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 45(6), 716–723 (1998)
B.D. Van Veen, K.M. Buckley, Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering. IEEE ASSP Mag. 5(2), 4–24 (1988)
B.D. Van Veen, W. Van Drongelen, M. Yuchtman, A. Suzuki, Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44(9), 867–880 (1997)
Y. Zhang, S. Zhu, L. Ding, et al., On the forward problem of EEG cortical imaging by means of finite element method. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, in IEMBS’04 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp 440–442 (2004)
Y. Zhang, S. Zhu, B. He, A second-order finite element algorithm for solving the three-dimensional EEG forward problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 49(13), 2975 (2004)
Y. Zhang, W. Van Drongelen, B. He, Estimation of in vivo brain-to-skull conductivity ratio in humans. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(22), 223903 (2006)
Y. Zhang, L. Ding, W. van Drongelen et al., A cortical potential imaging study from simultaneous extra-and intracranial electrical recordings by means of the finite element method. Neuroimage 31(4), 1513–1524 (2006)
Y. Zhang, W. van Drongelen, M. Kohrman, B. He, Three-dimensional brain current source reconstruction from intra-cranial ECoG recordings. Neuroimage 42(2), 683–695 (2008)
Y. Zhang, D. Wang, G.W. Timm, A three-dimensional muscle activity imaging technique for assessing pelvic muscle function. Inverse Probl 26(11), 115018 (2010)
Zhang Y (2013) Noninvasive imaging of internal muscle activities from multi-channel surface EMG recordings, in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp 5430–5432
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, Y. (2018). EEG Source Imaging and Multimodal Neuroimaging. In: Im, CH. (eds) Computational EEG Analysis. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0908-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0908-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0907-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0908-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)