Skip to main content

Reducing Carbon Growth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Science and Impact of Climate Change

Part of the book series: Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences ((AGES))

  • 973 Accesses

Abstract

Under the present circumstances of global warming, two actions are urgently required. One is to reduce the emission from greenhouse gases, and the other is to encourage climate engineering efforts such as carbon capture and storage and solar radiation management. GHG reduction must be done at all cost by all nations, whereas climate engineering technology can be introduced by rich countries at the earliest. Energy efficiency is one of the major energy-related threats being faced in most of the countries. The International Energy Agency estimates that in order to meet the energy efficiency target for 2050, the global spending has to increase from the current level of 300 billion USD per year to 680 billion USD. A business-as-usual scenario suggests that USA and European Union would reduce oil and coal consumption to improve energy efficiency by 2050. However, China and India, the two most populous nations will continue to rely heavily on coal and oil in near future and will not be able to transit to renewable source to the expected level. Like it or not, we will have to explore all possibilities of switching over to a combination of source from renewable energy basket including opting for draft animal power.

The total power need of the humans on Earth is approximately 16 terra watts which is expected to grow to 20 terra watts in 2020.

Johnson (2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berckmans, Gert, Maarten Messagie, Jelle Smekens, Noshin Omar, Lieselot Vanhaverbeke, and Joeri Van Mierlo. 2017. Cost projection of state of the art lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles up to 2030. Energies 10 (9): 1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthomieu, Yannick. 2014. Satellite lithium-ion batteries. In Lithium-ion batteries, 311–344.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, Kjell Arne, and Olof Johansson-Stenman. 2008. The behavioural economics of climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24 (2): 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth Policy Institute. 2008a Threatened species in major groups of organisms, 2007. Compiled by earth policy institute with 1980–1994 data from Worldwatch Institute, Signposts 2004, CD-ROM (Washington, DC: 2004); 1995 data from Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), Global Wind 2006 Report (Brussels: 2007); 1996–2007 data from GWEC, “U.S., China, & Spain Lead World Wind Power Market in 2007,” press release (Brussels: 6 February 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Earth Policy Institute. 2008b. World cumulative installed geothermal electricity-generating capacity, 1950–2005. Compiled by earth policy institute with 1950–1999 data from Worldwatch Institute, Signposts 2004, CD-ROM (Washington, DC: 2004); 2000–2005 data from Eric Martinot, Tsinghua-BP Clean Energy Research and Education Center, Earth Policy Institute (12 April 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frei, Christoph, Rob Whitney, Hans-Wilhelm Schiffer, Karl Rose, Dan A. Rieser, Ayed Al-Qahtani, Philip Thomas et al. 2013. World energy scenarios: Composing energy futures to 2050. No. INIS-FR–14-0059. Conseil Francais de l’energie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., A. R. Van Lienden, Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra, and Th H. Van der Meer. 2012. Biofuel scenarios in a water perspective: The global blue and green water footprint of road transport in 2030. Global Environmental Change 22 (3): 764–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Richard, and Nicholas Vasilakos. 2011. The economics of offshore wind. Energy Policy 39 (2): 496–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (IEA). 2013. Key world energy statistics. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, George. 2009. Plugging into the sun. National Geographic 216 (3): 28–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalam, APJ Abdul, and Srijan Pal Singh. 2011 Nuclear power is our gateway to a prosperous future. The Hindu 6: 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzig, Robert, and L. Locatelli. 2015. Germany could be a model for how we’ll get power in the future. National Geographic 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Li, Yalin Lei, Chunyan He, Sanmang Wu, and Jiabin Chen. 2016. Prediction on the peak of the CO2 emissions in China using the STIRPAT model. Advances in Meteorology 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Colin. 2013. The 2030 spike: Countdown to global catastrophe, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen, Malte, Nicolai Meinshausen, William Hare, Sarah CB Raper, Katja Frieler, Reto Knutti, David J. Frame, and Myles R. Allen. 2009. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 C. Nature 458 (7242): 1158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikolajczak, Celina, Michael Kahn, Kevin White, and Richard Thomas Long. 2012. Lithium-ion batteries hazard and use assessment. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfomak, Paul W., Peter Folger, and Adam Vann. 2007. Carbon dioxide (CO2) pipelines for carbon sequestration: Emerging policy issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroleum, British. 2007. BP statistical review of world energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Joshua D. 2015. From pandemic preparedness to biofuel production: Tobacco finds its biotechnology niche in North America. Agriculture 5 (4): 901–917.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ren21, Renewables. 2016 Global status report. Renewable energy policy network for the 21st century. http://www.ren21.net. Accessed 19 (2016).

  • Singh, Ajay Kumar, and Nalnish Chandr Singha. 2016. Environmental impact of nuclear power: Law and policy measures in India. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 4 (2): 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2008. The costs of failure: A preliminary assessment of major energy accidents, 1907–2007. Energy Policy 36 (5): 1802–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2010. A critical evaluation of nuclear power and renewable electricity in Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 40 (3): 369–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2011. Contesting the future of nuclear power: A critical global assessment of atomic energy. World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, Benjamin K., Rasmus Andersen, Steven Sorensen, Kenneth Sorensen, Victor Tienda, Arturas Vainorius, Oliver Marc Schirach, and Frans Bjørn-Thygesen. 2016. Balancing safety with sustainability: assessing the risk of accidents for modern low-carbon energy systems. Journal of cleaner production 112: 3952–3965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Lenore, and Tania Branigan. 2014. US and China strike deal on carbon cuts in push for global climate change pact. The Guardian 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2015a Charge of the lithium brigade. The Economist, 28 May 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2015b. Half death; the future of nuclear energy. The Economist, 31 Oct 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2015c. Why the Dutch oppose windmillsDutch Quixote. The Economist, 2nd July 2015| Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New Climate Economy. 2014. 2011 Better growth, better climate. The new climate economy report, the global commission on the economy and climate.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2013. Development Economics Dept. Development Data Group, and World Bank. Environment Dept. The little green data book…: From the world development indicators... International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asheem Srivastav .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Srivastav, A. (2019). Reducing Carbon Growth. In: The Science and Impact of Climate Change. Advances in Geographical and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0809-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics