Abstract
Understanding enzyme function is an exciting research because diverse and often unpredictable solutions are developed to perform seemingly impossible tasks. Enzymes are such powerful catalysts as they lower the height of the activation energy barrier. How do enzymes bring about this decrease in ΔG≠? Many excellent attempts to dissect this into discrete enthalpic and entropic factors have been made. Rate accelerations are favored when enzyme specifically binds and assembles substrates at the active site and then provides optimal arrangement of catalytic groups. This is clearly an entropic (ΔS≠) contribution. Stabilization of transition state through enthalpic (ΔH≠) factors like select hydrogen bonds, salt links, acid–base groups, covalent interactions, etc., is another feature. Various tricks that enzymes employ in achieving catalytic prowess are shown in Fig. 6.1. These components are best understood through case studies, and we will do this through representative examples for each.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carter P, Wells JA (1988) Dissecting the catalytic triad of a serine protease. Nature 332:564–568
Cleland WW (1964) Dithiothreitol, a new protective reagent for SH groups. Biochemistry 3:480–482
Cleland WW, Frey P, Gerlt JA (1998) The low barrier hydrogen bond in enzymatic catalysis. J Biol Chem 273:25529–25532
Choudhury R, Punekar NS (2007) Competitive inhibition of glutamate dehydrogenase reaction. FEBS Lett 581:2733–2736
Fersht AR (1987) The hydrogen bond in molecular recognition. Trends Biochem Sci 12:301–304
Getzoff ED, Cabelli DE, Fisher CL, Parge HE, Viezzoli MS, Banci L, Hallewell RA (1992) Faster superoxide dismutase mutants designed by enhancing electrostatic guidance. Nature 358:347–351
Jencks WP (1975) Binding energy, specificity, and enzymic catalysis: the Circe effect. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 43:219–410
Kirby AJ (2001) The lysozyme mechanism sorted – after 50 years. Nat Struct Biol 8:737–739
Mader MM, Bartlett PA (1997) Binding energy and catalysis: the implications for transition-state analogs and catalytic antibodies. Chem Rev 97:1281–1301
Page MI, Jencks WP (1971) Entropic contributions to rate accelerations in enzymic and intramolecular reactions and the chelate effect. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 68:1678–1683
Pauling L (1948) Nature of forces between large molecules of biological interest. Nature 161:707–709
Radzicka A, Wolfenden R (1995) Transition state and multisubstrate analog inhibitors. Meth Enzymol 249:284–312
Silman I, Sussman JL (2008) Acetylcholinesterase: how is structure related to function? Chem Biol Interact 175:3–10
Warshel A, Sharma PK, Kato M, Xiang Y, Liu H, Olsson MHM (2006) Electrostatic basis for enzyme catalysis. Chem Rev 106:3210–3235
Suggested Reading
Gutteridge A, Thornton JM (2005) Understanding nature’s catalytic toolkit. Trends Biochem Sci 30:622–629
Hansen DE, Raines RT (1990) Binding energy and enzymatic catalysis. J Chem Edu 67:483–489
Kirby AJ, Hollfelder F (2008) Biochemistry: enzymes under the nanoscope. Nature 456:45–47
Knowles JR (1991) Enzyme catalysis: not different, just better. Nature 350:121–124
Kraut J (1988) How do enzymes work? Science 242:533–540
Scott LT (2014) Enzyme catalysis, Basic principles in one easy lesson. Nat Chem 6:177–178
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Punekar, N.S. (2018). Origins of Enzyme Catalytic Power. In: ENZYMES: Catalysis, Kinetics and Mechanisms. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0785-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0785-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0784-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0785-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)