Abstract
The propensity of investors and investment to impact, for good or bad, on local economies, environments and on communities will depend, to a large extent, on the transformations in land-use and economic activity that those investments bring, as well as the extent to which local assets are engaged in new, locally embedded activities. This chapter has four aims: first, to scope the sorts of impacts that are examined in the case studies; second, to review the ways in which different impacts might be conceived and measured; third, to outline the framework for assessing investment impacts adopted in this research; and fourth, to explain how the gathered data for this study were interpreted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626.
Garrod, B., Wornell, R., & Youell, R. (2006). Re-conceptualising rural resources as countryside capita: The case of rural tourism. Journal of Rural Studies, 22, 117–128.
Gasparatos, A., Stromberg, P., & Takeuchi, K. (2011). Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: Putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 142, 111–128.
Glasson, J., & Wood, G. (2009). Urban regeneration and impact assessment for social sustainability. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(4), 283–290.
Kitchen, L., & Marsden, L. (2009). Creating sustainable rural development through stimulating the eco-economy: Beyond the eco-economic paradox? Sociologia Ruralis, 49(3), 274–294.
Lichfield, N. (1996). Community impact evaluation: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Current state and trends assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. http://www.milleniumassessment.org/en/Condition.aspx. Accessed 28 Nov 2017.
Mickwitz, P. (2003). A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments: Context and key concepts. Evaluation, 9(4), 415–136.
NCC (Natural Capital Committee). (2015). The state of natural capital: Protecting and improving natural capital for prosperity and wellbeing. London: Natural Capital Committee. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/natural-capital-committees-third-state-of-natural-capital-report. Accessed 28 Nov 2017.
Norgaard, R. B. (2010). Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69, 1219–1227.
Rogers, P. J., Petrosino, A., Huebner, T. A., & Hacsi, T. A. (2000). Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problems. In P. J. Rogers, T. A. Hacsi, A. Petrosino, & T. A. Huebner (Eds.), Program theory in evaluation: Challenges and opportunities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. New Directions for Evaluation, 87, 5–13.
Russel, D., & Jordan, A. (2007). Gearing up governance for sustainable development: Patterns of policy appraisal in UK central government. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(1), 1–21.
Spangenberg, J., von Haaren, J., & Settele, J. (2014). The ecosystem service cascade: Further developing the metaphor. Integrating societal processes to accommodate social processes and planning, and the case of bioenergy. Ecological Economics, 104, 22–32.
Vanclay, F. (2006). Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26, 3–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gallent, N., Hamiduddin, I., Juntti, M., Livingstone, N., Stirling, P. (2019). Assessing the Impacts of Investment. In: New Money in Rural Areas. Palgrave Pivot, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0770-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0770-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0769-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0770-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)