Advertisement

A Simulation Study on Indoor Location Estimation Based on the Extreme Radial Weibull Distribution

  • Kosuke OkusaEmail author
  • Toshinari Kamakura
Conference paper

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the possibility of analyzing indoor location estimation under the NLoS environment by radial extreme value distribution model based on the simulation. We assume that the observed distance between the transmitter and receiver is a statistical radial extreme value distribution. The proposed method is based on the marginal likelihoods of radial extreme value distribution generated by positive distribution among several transmitter radio sites placed in a room. Okusa and Kamakura (Lecture notes in engineering and computer science: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering 2017) [16] not discussed the more detail performance of radial distribution based approach. To cope with this, to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we carried out a simulation experiments. Results indicate that high accuracy was achieved when the method was implemented for indoor spatial location estimation.

Keywords

Extreme value distribution Indoor location estimation Positive distribution Radial distribution Statistical approach Weibull distribution 

References

  1. 1.
    Y.T. Chan, W.Y. Tsui, H.C. So, P.C. Ching, Time-of-arrival based localization under NLOS conditions. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 55(1), 17–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Fujita, T. Ohtsuki, T. Kaneko, Low complexity TOA localization algorithm for NLOS environments. Res. Paper IPS 15, 69–74 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. He, Y. Geng, K. Pahlavan, Modeling indoor TOA ranging error for body mounted sensors, in IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) (2012), pp. 682–686Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.C. Herrera, A. Hinkenjann, P.G. Ploger, J. Maiero, Robust indoor localization using optimal fusion filter for sensors and map layout information, in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (2013), pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Ikeda, M. Kawamoto, A. Sashima, J. Tsuji, H. Kawamura, K. Suzuki, K. Kurumatani, An indoor autonomous positioning and navigation service to support activities in large-scale commercial facilities, in Serviceology for Services (2014), pp. 191–201Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Kaemarungsi, P. Krishnamurthy, Properties of indoor received signal strength for WLAN location fingerprinting, in IEEE Conference In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services (2004), pp. 14–23Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Kamakura, K. Okusa, Estimates for the spatial locations of the indoor objects by radial distributions, in Proceedings of ISI World Statistics Congress 2013 (ISI2013), CPS109 (2013), pp. 3417–3422Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C.H. Knapp, G.C. Carter, The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 24(4), 320–327 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Li, B. Becerik-Gerber, Performance-based evaluation of RFID-based indoor location sensing solutions for the built environment. Adv. Eng. Inform. 25(3), 535–546 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Liu, H. Darabi, P. Banerjee, J. Liu, Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C: Appl. Rev. 37(6), 1067–1080 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Martin, Indoor Location-Based Services—Prerequisites and Foundations (Springer International Publishing, 2014). ISBN: 978-3-319-10698-4Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.L. Moses, D. Krishnamurthy, R.M. Patterson, A self-localization method for wireless sensor networks. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process. 348–358 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Niculescu, B. Nath, Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. INFOCOM 3, 1734–1743 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Okusa, T. Kamakura, Indoor location estimation based on the statistical spatial modeling and radial distributions, in Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2015, 21–23 Oct 2015, San Francisco, USA, pp. 835–840Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Okusa, T. Kamakura, Indoor location estimation based on the RSS method using radial log-normal distribution, in Proceedings of 16th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI2015) (2015), pp. 29–34Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Okusa, T. Kamakura, Statistical indoor location estimation for the NLoS environment using radial extreme value Weibull distribution, in Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering 2017, 5–7 July 2017, London, U.K., pp. 555–560Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Patwari, A.O. Hero III, M. Perkins, N.S. Correal, R.J. O’dea, Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 51(8), 2137–2148 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. Patwari, J.N. Ash, S. Kyperountas, A.O. Hero III, R.L. Moses, N.S. Correal, Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. Signal Process. Mag. 22(4), 54–69 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Roos, P. Myllymaki, H. Tirri, P. Misikangas, J. Sievänen, A probabilistic approach to WLAN user location estimation. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 9(3), 155–164 (2002)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Shen, A.F. Molisch, J. Salmi, Accurate passive location estimation using TOA measurements. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 11(6), 2182–2192 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L. Taponecco, A.A. D’Amico, U. Mengali, Joint TOA and AOA estimation for UWB localization applications. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 10(7), 2207–2217 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Venkatraman, J. Caffery Jr., H.R. You, A novel TOA location algorithm using LOS range estimation for NLOS environments. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 53(5), 1515–1524 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    T. Watabe, T. Kamakura, Localization algorithm in the indoor environment based on the ToA data, in Australian Statistical Conference 2010 Program and Abstracts (2010), p. 243Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    I. Yamada, T. Ohtsuki, T. THisanaga, L. Zheng, An indoor position estimation method by maximum likelihood algorithm using received signal strength. SICE J. Control Meas. Syst. Integr. 1(3), 251–256 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Chuo UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations