Advertisement

Collaborative Partnerships Within Communities of Practice: The Need for School-Based Action Research in Bangladesh

  • Raqib ChowdhuryEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 44)

Abstract

The pervasive binary that has divided ‘research-incapable’ school teachers from university academics has often led school teachers to believe that research is the prerogative task of so-called ‘experts’ in education – university academics, while their job is merely to translate and implement the results of research. Even if school teachers were to carry out research, the common perception is that it is of questionable validity. Teachers themselves on the other hand often complain of having little time or energy left for research because of heavy workload as well as a lack of extrinsic rewards for research-based activities. Why should teachers do research when they are already overwhelmed with the daily tasks of teaching and teaching-related commitments? This paper, based on a critical analysis of literature on teacher research, as well as a consideration of a number of recent action research projects in Bangladesh, looks at why it is important for teachers and academics to form collaborative partnerships by integrating research into their everyday practices and how this has benefits for both. The two objectives of this paper are each aimed at its two main readers – to familiarise or re-familiarise school teachers with research, in terms of why this is needed and how they can be involved in it within the daily challenges of teaching, and to encourage university teachers, for their own benefit, to build collaborative partnerships with school teachers to build truly meaningful and useful education research. This is possible when everyone can see opportunities for all to benefit from being part of a community of practice and to invest in the trustful symbiotic and complementary roles between school and university teachers.

Keywords

Collaborative partnership Action research Teacher research Continuing professional development 

References

  1. Alam, S. (2016). Teachers, collaboration, praxis: A case study of a participatory action research project in a rural school of Bangladesh. Unpublished PhD thesis, College of Education, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, G., & Arsenault, N. (2005). Fundamentals of educational research. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bantick, C. (2015). It’s time researchers let teachers do their job. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/action/printArticle?id=998215281
  4. Bintz, W. P., & Dillard, J. (2007). Teachers as reflective practitioners: Examining teacher stories of curricular change in a 4th grade classroom. Reading Horizons, 47(3), 203–227.Google Scholar
  5. Black-Hawkins, K., & Florian, L. (2012). Classroom teachers’ craft knowledge of their inclusive practice. Teachers and Teaching, 18(5), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.709732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bracken, M., & Bryan, A. (2010). The reflective practitioner model as a means of evaluating development education practice: Post-primary teachers’ self-reflections on ‘doing’ development education. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 11, 22–41.Google Scholar
  7. Brook, L., Sawyer, E., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2007). Teacher collaboration in the context of the responsive classroom approach. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, K. H. (2013). A call to action: Why we need more practitioner research. Democracy & Education, 21(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  9. Check, J., & Schutt, R. K. (2011). Research methods in education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Chowdhury, R., & Farooqui, S. (2009). Teacher training and teaching practice: The changing landscape of ELT in secondary education in Bangladesh. In L. Farrell, U. N. Singh, & R. A. Giri (Eds.), English language education in South Asia: From policy to pedagogy (pp. 147–159). Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds.). (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of action research. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Collin, S., & Karsenti, T. (2011). The collective dimension of reflective practice: The how and why. Reflective Practice, 12(4), 569–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Educating teachers for the next century: Rethinking practice and policy. In G. Griffin (Ed.), The education of teachers: 98th NSSE Yearbook, part 1 (pp. 221–256). Chicago: NSSE.Google Scholar
  14. Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teacher and Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Day, T. (2005). Teachers’ craft knowledge: A constant in times of change? Irish Educational Studies, 24(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donohoo, J. (2011). Collaborative enquiry: A facilitator’s guide. Ontario, Canada: Learning Forward.Google Scholar
  18. DuFour, R., DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
  19. Duncombe, R., & Armour, K. M. (2004). Collaborative professional learning: From theory to practice. Journal of In-service Education, 30(1), 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellis, N., & Loughland, T. (2016). The challenges of practitioner research: A comparative study of Singapore and NSW. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2).  https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n2.8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Field, C. (2011). The importance of research for education’s future. Retrieved on 20 August, 2015, from: http://www.expressandstar.com/education/2011/06/14/the-importance-of-research-for-educations-future/
  23. Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Gore, J., & Morrison, K. (2000). The perpetuation of a semi-profession: Challenges in the governance of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 31–47.Google Scholar
  25. Graham, P. (2007). Improving teacher effectiveness through structured collaboration: A case study of a professional learning community. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 31(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  26. Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hargreaves, A. (1992). Cultures of teaching: A focus for change. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 218–240). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  28. Harun, M., & Al-Amin, S. (2013). Continuous teacher development through reflective teaching and action research. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal, 8(1), 69–78. Retrieved from http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/admin/journal/upload/1308114/1308114.pdf
  29. Hasan, M. (2013). The geopolitics of political Islam in Bangladesh. Harvard Asian Quarterly, 14, 60–69. Retrieved on 21 June 2016, from www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/47246/80022_1.pdf
  30. Hine, G. S. C. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education program. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
  31. Islam, M. R. (2012). Islam in Bangladeshi society. South Asian Cultural Studies, 2(2), 3–10.Google Scholar
  32. Jahan, F., & Shahan, A. M. (2014). Power and influence of Islam-based political parties in Bangladesh: Perception versus reality. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 49(4), 426–441.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909613488350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, M. M. (2008). Collaborative partnerships: A model for science teacher education and professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemmis, S. (2001). The 2000 Radford lecture. Educational research and evaluation: Opening communicative space. The Australian Educational Researcher, 28(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals. Melbourne, Australia: Teaching Australia – Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Limited, Victoria University.Google Scholar
  37. Kruse, S. D., & Louis, K. S. (2009). Building strong school cultures: A guide to leading change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Le Cornu, R., Peters, J., Foster, M., & Shin, A. (2002, September 12–14). Leadership for school improvement. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference 2002, Exeter.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, I. (2011). Teachers as presenters at continuing professional development seminars in the English-as-a-foreign-language context: ‘I find it more convincing’. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lingard, B., & Renshaw, P. (2010). Teaching as a research-informed and research-informing profession. In A. Campbell & S. Groundwater-Smith (Eds.), Connecting inquiry and professional learning in education: International perspectives and practical solutions (pp. 26–39). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Loughran, J. (2002a). Teacher as researcher: The PAVOT project. In J. Loughran, I. Mitchell, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Learning from teacher research (pp. 3–18). Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  43. Loughran, J. (2002b). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Creating a professional learning community. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
  45. Masters, J. (1995). The history of action research. In I. Hughes (Ed.), Action research electronic reader. Sydney, Australia: The University of Sydney. Retrieved 27 May, 2016, from http://www.behs.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm
  46. McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(3), 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Opie, C. (2004). Research approaches. In C. Opie (Ed.), Doing educational research (pp. 73–94). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Potter, G. (2001). Facilitating critical reflection on practice through collaborative research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 28(3), 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rahman, S. M. H. (2011a). Influence of professional learning community (PLC) on secondary science teachers’ culture of professional practice: The case of Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  50. Rahman, S. M. H. (2011b). Professional learning of secondary science teachers in Bangladesh. Unpublished PhD thesis, Faculty of Education, Monash University, Australia.Google Scholar
  51. Rahman, S. M. H. (2012). Influence of professional learning community (PLC) on learning a constructivist teaching approach (POE): A case of secondary science teachers in Bangladesh. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  52. Rodgers, C. (2002). Seeing student learning: Teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 230–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salahuddin, M., & Khatun, R. (2013). How school teachers benefit from action research: A case study. BRA Journal for Classroom Teaching, 2013, 14–20.Google Scholar
  54. Sim, C. (2010). Sustaining productive collaboration between faculties and schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simons, J. (2002). Enhancing the use of professional craft knowledge in process drama teaching. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  56. Stenhouse, L. (1976). An introduction to curriculum development. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  57. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  58. Thornton, H. (2006). Teachers talking: The role of collaboration in secondary schools in Bangladesh. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 36(2), 181–196.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920600741180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tremblay, J. (2012). The strongest political instrument: Point one. Retrieved on 23 May, 2016, from:http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/column/the-strongest-political-instrument-point-one-2170/
  60. Waldron, N., & McLesky, J. (2010). Establishing a collaborative school culture through comprehensive school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practices: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wiersma, W. (2009). Research methods in education. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  64. World Bank. (2016). Percentage of teachers in primary education who are trained, both sexes (%). Retrieved on April 27, 2016, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TCAQ.ZS

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations