Advertisement

Governance of Private Universities in Bangladesh: The Myth of Institutional Autonomy

  • Ariful Haq KabirEmail author
  • Susan Webb
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 44)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore the expansion of higher education through the growth of private universities in the context of Bangladesh. The study explores these processes through a thematic qualitative analysis of the Private University Acts and Ordinance formulated by successive governments since the 1990s, which have dictated the governance and development of the private university in Bangladesh. This chapter traces the shifts in the governance system in the private universities in Bangladesh over a period of nearly 25 years and argues that the government developed a ‘mix private-public’ control of governance system in the private universities drawing on New Public Management (NPM) in order to control vested interests and political influences. This chapter further argues that the involvement of the state formally in the governance structure of private universities provides a new model of power sharing which has the potential to ensure that private universities can provide public good and circumscribes how these universities’ vested interest groups use the private university as a tool for their private business interests.

Keywords

Governance Autonomy Higher education Private university 

References

  1. Ahmad, M. (2004). The tale of the first private university in Bangladesh – North South University – (genesis – establishment – rise and thereafter): Recommendations for reforms of the sector. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Academic Press and Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, M. (2013). Shikka bebsai chatro leagure 10 neta [10 leaders of Student League are involved in education business]. Accessed 3 Sept 2013. http://www.prothom-alo.com/national/article/44279/
  3. Ahmed, M. (2014). Sangsod Israfil ar netritte obodoi porshod chalacche bissoboddaloy [an illegal body led by the MP, Israfil, runs the university]. Accessed 27 June 2014. http://www.prothom-alo.com/bangladesh/article/140791
  4. Altbach, P. G. (2005). Patterns in higher education development. In P. G. Altbach, R. O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 15–37). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rummbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Ball, S. J. (2015). Living the neo-liberal university. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 258–261.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chowdhury, R., & Le Ha, P. (2014). Desiring TESOL and international education: Market abuse and exploitation (Vol. 37). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations (pp. 137–152). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deem, R. (1998). ‘New managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giroux, H. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 425–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Government of Bangladesh. (1992). Private University Act 1992. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs.Google Scholar
  12. Government of Bangladesh. (1998). Private University Act 1998 (Amended). Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs.Google Scholar
  13. Government of Bangladesh. (2008). Private University Ordinance 2008. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs.Google Scholar
  14. Government of Bangladesh. (2010). Private University Act 2010. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs.Google Scholar
  15. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kabir, A. H. (2010). Neoliberal policy in the higher education sector in Bangladesh: Autonomy of public universities and the role of the state. Policy Futures in Education, 8(6), 619–631.  https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kabir, A. H. (2013). Neoliberalism, policy reforms and higher education in Bangladesh. Policy Futures in Education, 11(2), 154–166.  https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2013.11.2.154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levidow, L. (2007). Marketizing higher education: Neoliberal strategies and counterstrategies. In E. W. Ross & R. Gibson (Eds.), Neoliberalism and education reform (pp. 237–255). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53(3), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marginson, S. (2008). Academic creativity under new public management: Foundations. Educational Theory, 58(3), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00496.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. McClenaghan, P. (1998). The Vice-Chancellor as CEO: Corporate manager, transformational leader or academician. Paper presented at the Transformation in Higher Education Conference of the Higher Education and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA).Google Scholar
  25. Meek, V. L. (2003). Introduction. In A. Amaral, V. L. Meek, & I. M. Larsen (Eds.), The higher education managerial revolution? (Vol. 3, pp. 1–29). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss Publications.Google Scholar
  27. Mora, J. G. (2001). Governance and management in the new university. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Neave, G. (1988). On being economical with university autonomy: Being an account of the retrospective joys of a written constitution. In M. Tight (Ed.), Academic freedom and responsibility. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.Google Scholar
  29. Neowas, S. (2013). Besorkari bissobiddaloy akhon bebsa: Barche osthirota [Private university is now a business: Increasing tension]. Accessed 16 Sept 2013, from http://www.samakal.net/print_edition/details.php? news=13&view=archiev&y=2013&m=09&d=15&action=main&option=single&news_id=367243&pub_no=1528
  30. Prior, L. (2011). Using documents in social research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Issues of theory, method and practice (3rd ed., pp. 93–110). Los Angeles/ London/New Delhi, India/Singapore, Singapore/Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093032000124848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tapper, E. R., & Salter, B. G. (1995). The changing idea of university autonomy. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tilak, J. B. (2006). Private higher education: Philanthropy to profits. InHigher education in the world 2006: The financing of the universities (pp. 113–121). Barcelona, Spain: GUNI.Google Scholar
  34. Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB). (2012). Transparency international Bangladesh: Social movement against corruption. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Transparency International Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  35. Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB). (2014). Besorkary bisshobiddaloy: Sushoner jonno challenge abong uttoroner upai [Private Universities: Challenges for good governance, and a way forward]. Accessed 1 July 2014, from http://www.ti-bangladesh.org/beta3/images/2014/es_ds_private-univ_14_bn.pdf
  36. University Grants Commission. (2006). Strategic plan for higher education 2006–2026. Dhaka, Bangladesh: UGC.Google Scholar
  37. University Grants Commission. (2009). Handbook: Universities of Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: University Grants Commission.Google Scholar
  38. University Grants Commission. (2010). Chottrishtomo barshik protibedon 2009 [36th Annual report 2009]. Dhaka, Bangladesh: UGC.Google Scholar
  39. University Grants Commission. (2013). Unochollishtomo barshik protibedon 2012 [39th Annual report 2012]. Dhaka, Bangladesh: UGC.Google Scholar
  40. University Grants Commission. (2015). List of private universities. Accessed 8 Mar 2015, from http://www.ugc.gov.bd/university/?action=private
  41. Ward, S. C. (2012). Neoliberalism and the global restructuring of knowledge and education. Hoboken, NJ: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Education and ResearchUniversity of DhakaDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations