Advertisement

An Analysis of the Secondary School Certificate Examination: The Case of Creative Questions

  • Farhan AzimEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 44)

Abstract

The Secondary School Certificate (SSC) examination is arguably the most important public examination in Bangladesh with its results affecting students in a number of ways, including access to higher education and future job opportunities. A number of previous studies have looked at this examination from various perspectives, analysing specific areas within the examination and within different subjects. However, these researches have not extensively focused on critically analysing this examination and the assessment activities related to it. The lack of research-based knowledge is particularly worrying with the current SSC examination protocol in which Creative Questions have been introduced a few years ago. This chapter analyses the SSC examination, taking into consideration the existing system of assessment in Bangladesh in light of contemporary theory and practice of assessment. After providing a contextual understanding of the SSC examination, various aspects of this assessment – validity, reliability, comparability, standard setting, grading, and bias – are critically discussed with reference to widely accepted assessment theories. Existing studies on SSC examination are reviewed to assess and highlight different aspects of the current situation based on the assessment theories. A number of issues in the existing practice (e.g. construct under-representation, inappropriate assessment condition, marker error, and coarseness of grading) are identified as well as measures for improvement suggested. The theoretical and practical issues discussed in this chapter endeavour to provide insights into education policymakers in shaping the SSC examination for future years.

Keywords

Assessment Public examination SSC examination Secondary education 

References

  1. Ahmed, M. (2012, May 8). Srijonshil prosner voi kete geche [Fear of creative questions has dissipated]. Prothom Alo. Retrieved from http://archive.prothom-alo.com/detail/news/256005
  2. AQA. (2008). A basic guide to standard setting. Retrieved from http://store.aqa.org.uk/over/pdf/GUIDETOSTANDARDSETTING.PDF
  3. Azim, F. (2012). Reforming education by reforming assessment: Theory and practice of School Based Assessment (SBA) in Bangladesh. Paper presented at the 19th Conference on Learning, London, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Baird, J. (2007). Alternative conceptions of comparability. In P. Newton, J. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick, & P. Tymms (Eds.), Techniques of monitoring the comparability of examination standards (pp. 124–165). London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.Google Scholar
  5. Begum, H. A., & Mullick, J. I. (2005). Totto o chorchay biddyaloy vittik mullayan: Antorjatik o Bangladesh prekkhapot [Theory and practice of school based assessment: Bangladesh and international perspective]. Bangladesh Asiatic Society Potrika, 13(2), 153–183.Google Scholar
  6. Billah, M. (2015, May 26). Prosno srijonshil othocho sikhkhokera jantrik [The questions are creative but why are the teachers mechanical]. Jugantor. Retrieved from http://www.jugantor.com/sub-editorial/2015/05/26/269344
  7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2012). The reliability of assessments. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 243–263). London: Sage Publications Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Vol. 1: cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
  9. Cambridge Assessment. (2009). The Cambridge approach: Principles for designing, administering and evaluating assessment. Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge Assessment Group.Google Scholar
  10. Cresswell, M. J. (1996). Defining, setting and maintaining standards in curriculum embedded examinations: Judgemental and statistical approaches. In H. Goldstein & T. Lewis (Eds.), Assessment: Problems, developments, and statistical issues (pp. 57–84). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Crooks, T. J., Kane, M. T., & Cohen, A. S. (1996). Threats to the valid use of assessment. Assessment in Education, 3(3), 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein, H. (1993). Assessing group differences. Oxford Review of Education, 19(2), 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haider, M. Z. (2008). Assessing “communicative” writing skills: An evaluation of the SSC English examination. Bangladesh Education Journal, 7(2), 47–62.Google Scholar
  14. Haq, F., & Alam, K. (2010). Gender songbedonshilota, HIV/Aids o projonon sasthosikkha: Jatio patthopustok o sikkha upokoron porjalochona [Gender sensitivity, HIV/Aids and education on reproductive health: Examining national textbooks and teaching materials]. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Nari Progoti Songho (BNPS).Google Scholar
  15. Holbrook, J. (2007). Standardisation of marks across examination boards: An important step towards raising the education standard in Bangladesh. Teacher’s World, 30-31, 11–18.Google Scholar
  16. Hossain, M. Z. (2009). Creative questions: Validity and reliability of secondary school certificate examination. Bangladesh Education Journal, 8(2), 33–43.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchinson, D., Francis, M., & Griffin, P. (2014). Developmental teaching and assessment. In P. Griffin (Ed.), Assessment for teaching (pp. 26–57). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ibrahim, M. (2010, August 23). Porikkha poddhoti: “Srijonshile” voi nei ache anondo [Assessment system: No fear in “Creative”, joy instead]. Prothom Alo. Retrieved from http://archive.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2010-08-23/news/88658
  19. Isaacs, T. (2013). Comparability. In C. Zara, T. Isaacs, S. Coombs, G. Herbert, & C. Smith (Eds.), Key concepts in educational assessment (pp. 30–34). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Islam, M. A. (1998). School libraries in Bangladesh: A state-of-the-art report. School Libraries Worldwide, 4(2), 15–21.Google Scholar
  21. Kabir, D. G. M. A. (2010, January 4). Srijonshil porikkha poddhoti: Jyati gothone ek bolistho podokkhep [Creative questioning system: A strong step towards building the nation]. Naya Diganta, p. 6.Google Scholar
  22. Khan, N. J., Azim, F., & Ahmed, S. S. (2010). The practice of class and practical work within SBA in secondary school classroom. NAEM Journal, 5(10), 15–24.Google Scholar
  23. Koretz, D. (2008). Measuring up: What educational testing really tells us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maleque, M. A., Begum, M., Islam, M. F., & Riad, S. S. (2011). Sikkhabiggan o Bangladeshe Sikkha [Pedagogy and education in Bangladesh] (2nd ed.). Dhaka, Bangladesh: University Grants Commission.Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Education. (2012). Grading system: Letter grade system of individual subject. Retrieved from http://www.educationboard.gov.bd/grads.htm.
  27. Mullick, J. I., & Begum, H. A. (2005). Biases in the current assessment practices at secondary level education in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Education Journal, 4(2), 47–63.Google Scholar
  28. Munshi, M. N. (2009). Status of school library development in Bangladesh. Sri Lanka Journal of Librarianship & Information Management, 1(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Curriculum and Textbook Board [NCTB]. (2005). Teacher's guide for school based assessment (SBA) at the secondary level. Dhaka, Bangladesh: National Curriculum and Textbook Board.Google Scholar
  30. National Curriculum and Textbook Board [NCTB]. (2008). Biddyaloyvittik mullayon o srijonshil prosnopoddhoti [School based assessment and creative questioning]. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Secondary Education Sector Development Project (SESDP).Google Scholar
  31. Ofqual. (2011). The new GCE A level examinations: Findings from the monitoring of the new qualifications in 2010. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1064/1/Ofqual-10-4717-new-GCE-AS-level-qualifications-report-03-2010.pdf
  32. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority [QCA]. (2006). QCA’s review of standards: Description of the programme. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8909/.
  33. Riad, S. S. (2010). Srijonshil Prosno o Koekti Prostab [Creative question and some propositions]. The Daily Samakal. Retrieved from http://www.samakal.com.bd/details.php? news=20&view=archiev&y=2010&m=12&d=15&action=main&menu_type=&option=single&news_id=116135&pub_no=543&type=
  34. Roy, G. (2009). Kathamoboddho prosno: Ashar cheye asonkai besi [Structured questions: More doubt than promise]. Retrieved from http://www.bn.bdeduarticle.com/?p=29
  35. Stobart, G. (2005). Fairness in multicultural assessment systems. Assessment in Education, 12(3), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Talukder, M. (2012, May 8). Srijonshil prosno poddhoti: Panch karone orjito hocchena moulik lokkho [Creative questioning system: Five obstacles in achieving its core aim]. The Dainik Azadi. Retrieved from http://www.dainikazadi.org/details2.php?news_id=689&table=may2012&date=2012-05-08&page_id=1&view=1&instant_status=
  37. Tanzeen, K. N. (2011). Present practice of School Based Assessment (SBA) at secondary level: Perception of the stakeholders. Unpublished master’s thesis. Institute of Education and Research (IER), University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  38. Tarana, K. N. (2011). Conceptions and perceptions about assessment. Unpublished master’s thesis. Institute of Education and Research (IER), University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations