Skip to main content

Learning Analytics in Practice: Providing E-Learning Researchers and Practitioners with Activity Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Cyberlearning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe a practical solution for providing all researchers and practitioners in an online university with a unified learning analytics database (LA-DB) containing evidence-based activity data. Our goal is to seamlessly capture all relevant data generated within a virtual learning environment, using a very simple learning record store containing only a few tables, trying to overcome the typical problems in such a huge and complex scenario, namely data fragmentation, duplicity, inconsistencies, and lack of standardization across different data sources currently used by the university, without interfering with current information systems and procedures. In order to do so, some technological and organizational changes to promote a “data culture” within the institution have been considered. The system, implemented entirely using cloud services, allows researchers and practitioners to pose and answer questions using a simple activity-driven data model, combining data from three different levels of analysis, ranging from session-based (short-term) to institutional (long-term). Available data includes navigation, interaction, communication, and assessment, as well as high-level indicators that aggregate and summarize learner activity. Finally, we also present some preliminary actions taken for fighting early dropout as an institutional project using the proposed infrastructure and gathered data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://researchmap.pilots.elearnlab.org/

  2. 2.

    https://www.uoc.edu/portal/en/elearncenter/innovacio/projectes/fitxes-projectes/projecte-10.html

  3. 3.

    http://www.ehea.info/

References

  • Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., & Reiser, B. J. (1985). Intelligent tutoring systems. Science (Washington), 228(4698), 456–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atzeni, P., Jensen, C. S., Orsi, G., Ram, S., Tanca, L., & Torlone, R. (2013). The relational model is dead, SQL is dead, and I don’t feel so good myself. ACM SIGMOD Record, 42(2), 64–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbera, E., Gros, B., & Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Paradox of time in research on educational technology. Time & Society, 24(1), 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berking, P. (2015). Choosing a learning record store (LRS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. (2011). Scalable SQL and NoSQL data stores. ACM SIGMOD Record, 39(4), 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, P. (2010). Online higher education commodity. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(3), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Blanco, Á., Serrano, Á., Freire, M., Martínez-Ortiz, I., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2013, March). E-Learning standards and learning analytics. Can data collection be improved by using standard data models? In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2013 IEEE (pp. 1255–1261). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCandia, G., Hastorun, D., Jampani, M., Kakulapati, G., Lakshman, A., Pilchin, A., et al. (2007). Dynamo: Amazon’s highly available key-value store. ACM SIGOPS operating systems review, 41(6), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., Hoel, T., Scheffel, M., Kismihók, G., Berg, A., Ferguson, R., & Manderveld, J. (2015, March). Ethical and privacy issues in the application of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 390–391). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, S., Gibson, D., Du Plessis, C., Halloran, P., Williams, E., Ambrose, M., et al. (2015). Foundations of dynamic learning analytics: Using university student data to increase retention. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1175–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau-Valldosera, J., & Minguillón, J. (2014). Rethinking dropout in online higher education: The case of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Educational technology & society, 15(3), 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guitart, I. & Conesa, J. (2016). Creating University Analytical Information Systems: A grand challenge for information systems research. In Formative assessment, learning data analytics and gamification (pp. 167–186), Cambridge: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, R., & Ross, M. (2011). The data warehouse toolkit: The complete guide to dimensional modeling. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinchin, I. (2012). Avoiding technology-enhanced non-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), E43–E48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2012). Numbers are not enough. Why e-learning analytics failed to inform an institutional strategic plan. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P., Qassem, T., & Xhafa, F. (2014, November). ‘NoSQL’ and electronic patient record systems: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing (3PGCIC), 2014 (pp. 300–307). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor, E., Garreta-Domingo, M., Minguillón, J., & Lewis, S. (2007, July). A three-level approach for analyzing user behavior in ongoing relationships. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 971–980). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor, E., Minguillón, J., & Carbó, J. M. (2006). Analysis of user navigational behavior for e-learning personalization. Data Mining in E-Learning (Advances in Management Information), 4, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oncu, S., & Cakir, H. (2011). Research in online learning environments: Priorities and methodologies. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1098–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Ayala, A. (2014). Educational data mining: A survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1432–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, Y. (2014, June). The value improvement in education service by grasping the value acceptance state with ICT utilized education environment. In International Conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information (pp. 90–98). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangrà, A. (2002). A new learning model for the information and knowledge society: The case of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Spain. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J. L., Verbert, K., Klerkx, J., Duval, E., Charleer, S., & Ternier, S. (2015). Tracking data in open learning environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(7), 976–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2015). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Gasevic, D. (2012). Guest editorial-learning and knowledge analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stonebraker, M., & Cetintemel, U. (2005, April). “One size fits all”: An idea whose time has come and gone. In 21st International Conference on Data Engineering, 2005. ICDE 2005. Proceedings (pp. 2–11). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. C. (1999, June). Distance education: The fifth generation. In Proceedings of the 19th ICDE World Conference on Open Learning and Distance Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Barneveld, A., Arnold, K. E., & Campbell, J. P. (2012). Analytics in higher education: Establishing a common language. EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, 1(1), l–ll.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Govaerts, S., Duval, E., Santos, J. L., Van Assche, F., Parra, G., et al. (2014). Learning dashboards: An overview and future research opportunities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1499–1514.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. (2012). Hadoop: The definitive guide. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the Generalitat de Catalunya (Government of Catalonia) ref. 2014 SGR 1271.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Minguillón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Minguillón, J., Conesa, J., Rodríguez, M.E., Santanach, F. (2018). Learning Analytics in Practice: Providing E-Learning Researchers and Practitioners with Activity Data. In: Spector, J., et al. Frontiers of Cyberlearning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0650-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0650-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0649-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0650-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics