Skip to main content

Towards a Cloud-Based Big Data Infrastructure for Higher Education Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Cyberlearning

Abstract

This chapter reports about experiences gained in developing a learning analytics infrastructure for an ecosystem of different MOOC providers in Europe. These efforts originated in the European project ECO that aimed to develop a single-entry portal for various MOOC providers by developing shared technologies for these providers and distributing these technologies to the individual MOOC platforms of the project partners. The chapter presents a big data infrastructure that is able to handle learning activities from various sources and shows how the work in ECO led to a standardised approach for capturing learning analytics data according to the xAPI specification and storing them into cloud-based big data storage. The chapter begins with a definition of big data in higher education and thereafter describes the practical experiences gained from developing the learning analytics infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://project.ecolearning.eu/.

  2. 2.

    See https://experienceapi.com and https://github.com/adlnet/xAPI-Spec.

  3. 3.

    Detailed examples are available at https://experienceapi.com/statements-101/.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/TrustedLA/xAPI-Dutch-Spec/.

  5. 5.

    https://experienceapi.com/adopters/.

  6. 6.

    http://xapi.vocab.pub.

  7. 7.

    https://experienceapi.com/recipes/.

  8. 8.

    https://github.com/kirstykitto/CLRecipe.

  9. 9.

    https://github.com/jiscdev/xapi.

  10. 10.

    https://www.imsglobal.org/activity/caliper.

  11. 11.

    https://d3js.org.

  12. 12.

    https://developers.google.com/chart/.

  13. 13.

    http://www.laceproject.eu.

  14. 14.

    https://www.rescuetime.com.

  15. 15.

    https://www.fitbit.com.

  16. 16.

    https://openweathermap.org.

References

  • Berg, A., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2016). Dutch cooking with xAPI recipes: The good, the bad and the consistent. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT ’16 (pp. 234–236). https://doi.org/10.1109/icalt.2016.48.

  • Berland, M., Baker, R S Jd, & Bilkstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börner, D., Tabuenca, B., Storm, J., Happe, S., & Specht, M. (2015). Tangible interactive ambient display prototypes to support learning scenarios. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’15) (p. 721). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouns, F., Mota, J., Morgado, L., Jansen, D., Fano, S., Silva, A., et al. (2014, October 27–28). A networked learning framework for effective MOOC design: The ECO project approach. In A. M. Teixeira & A. Szücs (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th EDEN Research Workshop—Challenges for Research into Open & Distance Learning: Doing Things Better: Doing Better Things (pp. 161–171). Budapest, Hungary: EDEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasu, T., & Johnson, T. (2003). Exploratory data mining and data cleaning. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Mitri, D., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Börner, D., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2017). Learning pulse: A machine learning approach for predicting performance in self-regulated learning using multimodal data. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, LAK’17 (pp. 188–197), ACM: New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027447.

  • Drachsler, H., Bogers, T., Vuorikari, R., Verbert, K., Duval, E., Manouselis, N., et al. (2010). Issues and considerations regarding sharable data sets for recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In N. Manouselis, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, & O. Santos (Eds.), Procedia Computer Science, 1(2), 2849–2858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics—It’s a DELICATE issue. A checklist to establish trusted learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’16 (pp. 89–98). ACM: New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883893.

  • Drachsler, H., & Kalz, M. (2016). The MOOC and learning analytics innovation cycle (MOLAC): A reflective summary of ongoing research and its challenges. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2017). Awareness is not enough. Pitfalls of learning analytics dashboards in the educational practise. In É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, & M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.), LNCS: Vol. 10474. Data driven approaches in digital education: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on technology enhanced learning (EC-TEL 2017) (pp. 82–96). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitto, K., Cross, S., Waters, Z., & Lupton, M. (2015). Learning analytics beyond the LMS: The connected learning analytics toolkit. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK’15 (pp. 11–15). ACM: New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723627.

  • Koper, R., & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the learning design of units of learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., Drachsler, H., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Investigating collaborative learning success with physiological coupling indices based on electrodermal activity. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK ’16 (pp. 64–73), ACM: New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883897.

  • Qu, C., & Nejdl, W. (2002, September). Towards interoperability and reusability of learning resources: A SCORM-conformant courseware for computer science education. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (IEEE ICALT 2002), Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Toisoul, C., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2017). The proof of the pudding: Examining validity and reliability of the evaluation framework for learning analytics. In É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.), LNCS: Vol. 10474. Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2017) (pp. 194–208). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_15.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., & Santos, J. (2013). Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefaan Ternier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ternier, S., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H. (2018). Towards a Cloud-Based Big Data Infrastructure for Higher Education Institutions. In: Spector, J., et al. Frontiers of Cyberlearning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0650-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0650-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0649-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0650-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics