Abstract
In the past two decades, the trend of internationalization of higher education has been rapidly developed in contemporary China. Moreover, the Chinese government is seeking to keep in pace with the trend of internationalization to address both national and international challenges (Ayoubi and Massoud 2007). The trend of internationalization of Chinese higher education is deeply rooted in the integrated process of transformation of higher education worldwide. The acceleration of internationalization of higher education has been on the agenda at national, regional, and international dimensions (Rui 2014). Since the 1970s, the ultimate goal of the internationalization of higher education in China is to fulfill “Four Modernizations” (of industry, agriculture, defense, science and technology) in Chinese higher education system. Based on this purpose, the internationalization of higher education has been undertaken by the means of sending Chinese students and faculty abroad for international study and research, combining an international orientation into university teaching and learning, and offering transnational projects in consistent with foreign institutional partnerships with Chinese universities (Rui 2014). From a comparative and international perspective, Chinese higher education has obtained diverse advantages by implementing a series of education politics for advocating internationalization of Chinese higher education contextually. Hence, the major purpose of this research involves in mapping the internationalization of higher education in terms of constructing soft power conversion model of higher education (HE) from an international political science perspective. In addition, framing soft power conversion model of HE is implicitly consistent with the internationalization of higher education worldwide. In other words, the process of internationalization of higher education also stimulates constructing soft power of HEs. Moreover, this research also brings a specific initial lens to examine the internationalization of higher education in Chinese higher education context from international political science perspective. Specifically, in this study, this article is divided into three major sections: in the first section, Nye’s theory of soft power has been introduced and elaborated by several steps; then, in the second section, as a main part of this article, conceptualizing soft power conversion model of HE is constituted for explicit pathway and implicit process separately. In the explicit pathway of soft power conversion model of HE, political attractiveness, educational resources, and educational outcomes of internalization of higher education have been investigated and elaborated; in the implicit process of framing soft power conversion model of HE, cultivating and advocating global competency is considered as an essential pathway to enhance soft power of HE worldwide. In the last section, educational policy recommendations and remarks have been illustrated in accordance with constructing soft power conversion model of HE in Chinese higher education context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AAC&U. (2010). Essential learning outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/EssentialOutcomes_Chart.pdf.
Altbach, P. (1991). Patterns in higher education development. Prospects, 21(2).
Altbach, P. G. (1998). Comparative higher education: Knowledge, the university and development. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center, University of Hong Kong.
Altbach, P. G. (2001). The American academic model in comparative perspective. In P. Altbach, P. J. Gumport, & D. B. Johnstone (Eds.), In defense of American higher education (pp. 11–37). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ayoubi, R. M., & Massoud, H. K. (2007). The strategy of internationalization in universities: A quantitative evaluation of the intent and implementation in UK universities. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710749546.
Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cannon, H., & Djajanegara, O. (1997). Internationalization of higher education in Indonesia. In J. Knight & H. de Wit (Eds.), Internationalization of higher education in Asia Pacific countries (pp. 65–81). Amsterdam: EAIE.
Chang, J. Y. (2006). Globalization and English in Chinese higher education. World Englishes, 25(3–4), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2006.00484.x.
Fantini, A. E. (2009). Assessing intercultural competence. The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 456–476). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Hill, D. J. (1991). Global education and the study abroad program. Ohio: Renaissance Publications.
Hu, G. W. (2005). English language education in China: Policies, progress and problems. Language Policy, 4(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-004-6561-7.
Hunter, B., White, G. P., & Godbey, G. (2006). What does it mean to be globally competent? Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 267–285.
Johnstone, D. B. (2000). Worldwide reforms in the financing and management of higher education. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Knight, J. (1997). Internationalization of higher education: A conceptual framework. In J. Knight & H. de Wit (Eds.), Internationalization of higher education in Asia Pacific countries (pp. 5–19). Amsterdam: EAIE.
Knight, J. (2008). The internationalization of higher education: Are we on the right track? Academic Matters: The Journal of Higher Education, 5–9.
Kubow, P. K., & Fossum, P. R. (2007). Comparative education: Exploring issues in international context. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Li, Y. L. (2012). Cultivating student global competence: A pilot experimental study decision. Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 11(1). January 2013. Printed in the U.S.A.
Li, Y. (2013). Cultivating student global competence: a pilot experimental study. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 11(1), 125–143.
Li, W. (2014). Internationalization with Chinese characteristics. The changing discourse of internationalization in China. Chinese Education and Society, 47(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932470101.
Lohmann, J. R., Rollins, H. A., & Joseph Hoey, J. (2006). Defining, developing and assessing global competence in engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1), 119–131.
Marginson, S. (2009). Global perspectives and strategies of Asia-Pacific research universities. Evaluation in Higher Education, 3(2), 1–43.
Mok, H. K. (2005). Globalization and educational restructuring: University merging and changing governance in China. Higher Education, 50, 57–88.
Pan, L. (2011). English language ideologies in the Chinese foreign language education policies: A world-system perspective. Language Policy, 10(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9205-8.
Reimers, F. (2000). Unequal schools, unequal chances: The challenges to equal opportunity in the Americas (Vol. 5). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
Reimers, F. (2009). Educating for global competency. In J. E. Cohen & M. B. Malin (Eds.), International perspectives on the goals of universal basic and secondary education (pp. 183–202). New York: Routledge.
Rui, Y. (2014). China’s strategy for the internationalization of higher education: An overview. Frontiers of Education in China 2014, 9(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-003-014-0014-x.
Stromquist, N., & Monkman, K. (2000). Globalization and education. Integration and contestation across cultures. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Stuart Hunter, M., & White, E. R. (2004). Could fixing: Academic advising: Fix higher education. About Campus, 9(1), 20–25.
Yang, R. (2002). Third delight: Internationalization of higher education in China. New York: Routledge.
Yang, R. (2011). Self and the other in the Confucian cultural context: Implications of China’s higher education development for comparative studies. International Review of Education, 57(3–4), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9208-x.
Yang, R. (2012a). Internationalization, regionalization and soft power: China’s relations with ASEAN member countries in higher education. Frontiers of Education in China, 7(4), 486–507. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-001-012-0025-3.
Yang, R. (2012b). Scholarly publishing, knowledge mobility. In T. Fenwick & L. Farrell (Eds.), Knowledge mobilization and educational research: Politics, languages and responsibilities and internationalization of Chinese universities (pp. 185–167). New York: Routledge.
Yang, R. (2012c). Soft power and higher education: An examination of China’s Confucius Institutes. In E. Hartmann (Ed.), The internationalization of higher education: Towards a new research agenda in critical higher education studies (pp. 65–76). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, J. (2018). Mapping Soft Power of Chinese Higher Education. In: Conceptualizing Soft Power of Higher Education. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0641-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0641-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0640-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0641-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)