Plausible Futures: Transforming Ourselves, Transforming Our Industry
William Angliss Institute (WAI) aspires to become a University of Specialisation. This chapter outlines some of the reasons behind this objective and the challenges involved in seeking to achieve it. The author contends that the Institute and the industry it services must co-evolve and transform their worldviews if they are to meet the challenges of an uncertain future: a task that entails developing more complex epistemologies. Based on the author’s doctoral research that suggest a catalytic correlation between participation in certain forms of scenario planning and epistemic development, a transformative approach to scenario based research is proposed as a vehicle for bringing about this transformation. The methodology for a proposed scenario research project is explained and its potential short and long term benefits for both WAI and the industry are identified. The proposal represents innovation in WAI’s own development and its industry partnerships.
KeywordsScenario planning Epistemic development Worldview Transformative learning
This chapter was developed from a conference working paper titled “Plausible futures for education and training in food, hospitality, tourism and events” originally presented at CAUTHE 2017: Time for Big Ideas? Re-thinking the Field for Tomorrow, Dunedin, New Zealand.
The author acknowledges the contributions of Emeritus Professor Richard Bawden, Western Sydney University and Oliver Freeman, Adjunct Professor, University of Technology Sydney/Neville Freeman Agency for their conceptualisation of the proposed WAI scenario researching project.
- Bawden, R. (2016). Personal correspondence [Email]. 27 October.Google Scholar
- Bawden, R., & Freeman, O. (2007). Scenario planning as an experiential exercise in social, reflexive and transformational learning. http://www.oliverfreeman.com.au/library.html. Accessed October 30, 2017.
- Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems: Basic concepts of systems and organization. New York: Basic Books Inc.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
- Dirkx, J. M., & Smith, R. O. (2009). Facilitating transformative learning: Engaging emotions in an online context. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor & Associates (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace and higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Freeman, O. (2004). Building scenario worlds: How to transform our approach to business and strategic development. North Sydney: Richmond.Google Scholar
- Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Braten, I. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kegan, R. (2009). What ‘form’ transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning theorists … in their own words. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social sciences. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview of transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ogilvy, J. A. (2004). Scenario planning, critical theory and the role of hope. In R. A. Slaughter (Ed.), Knowledge base of futures studies. Brisbane: Foresight International.Google Scholar
- Perry, W. G. (1968/1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1992). How to link strategic vision to core capabilities (pp. 67–80). Fall: Sloan Management Review.Google Scholar
- Schon, D. (1995). The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change, November/December, 27–34.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Taylor, E. W., & Cranton, P. & Associates (Eds.) (2012). The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- van der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- van der Heijden, K., Bradfield, R., Burt, G., Carins, G., & Wright, G. (2002). The sixth sense: Accelerating organizational learning with scenarios. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wack, P. (1985). Scenarios: The gentle art of re-perceiving. [Unpublished manuscript]. Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Williams, M. (2016). Learning scenarios: Transforming worldviews. Ph.D., University of Melbourne.Google Scholar