Abstract
Online evaluations (like Rate My Professors and Rate My Teachers) have been celebrated as forming wider publics and modes of accountability beyond the institution and critiqued as reinforcing consumeristic pedagogical relations. This chapter takes up the websites Rate My Professors and Rate My Teachers as empirical entry points to a conceptual discussion, after Félix Guattari , of the ontological plurality of digital voice, and its associated refrains and universes of reference. I turn attention from analysis of the effects of these digitized student evaluations to the moment of their formation—for example, when a student’s finger clicks on a particular star rating. Refusing to separate human bodies from objects, environment and affects, inside from outside, ‘real’ from ‘digital ’, I consider how emerging modes of online student evaluations of teaching shift individual and collective relations to ‘expression’ and subjectivity . This chapter also explores the transversal possibilities of de-subjectification offered in when the digital is understood as intercesseur: intersection/intercession.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While it is beyond the scope of this chapter, further work is needed that maps the reach of these sites, and how they conspire with data mining industries.
- 2.
I spell this word as subjectification after the spelling used in translations of Guattari and Deleuze and Guattari ’s work cited in this chapter. I acknowledge, however, a distinction between subjectification : “a thoroughly stratified or captured position”, and subjectivication: “subjective operations which, although operating within social machines, use the processes of these social machines to form lines of escape from them” (Murphie, 2001, p. 1315). For Murphie, both concepts “involve one’s implication in contemporary social machines” and both are “pragmatic” (Murphie, 2001, p. 1315). Both processes may be at work in manifestations of digital voice, as I argue below.
- 3.
Acknowledgement and thanks to one of the anonymous reviewers for suggesting this point.
References
Arvidsson, A., & Piertesen, N. (2013). The ethical economy: Rebuilding value after the crisis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Boswell, S. S. (2016). Ratemyprofessors is hogwash (but I care): Effects of Ratemyprofessors and university-administered teaching evaluations on professors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.045.
Boutang, P.-A. (Writer). (1996). L’Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze, avec Claire Parnet [Gilles Deleuze’s ABC Primer, with Claire Parnet]. Paris: La Femis & Sodaperaga Productions.
Bryant, L. R. (2006). Lacan and Deleuze: A Pet Peeve. Retrieved from https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2006/05/22/lacan-and-deleuze-a-pet-peeve/.
Clayson, D. E. (2014). What does ratemyprofessors.com actually rate? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(6), 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.861384.
Coladarci, T., & Kornfield, I. (2007). RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(6), 1–15.
Cole, D. R. (2007). Virtual terrorism and the internet e-learning options. E-Learning, 4(2), 116–127.
Cole, D. R. (2014). Inter-collapse … Educational Nomadology for a Future Generation. In M. Carlin & J. Wallin (Eds.), Deleuze & Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come (pp. 77–95). London: Bloomsbury.
Cole, D. R., & Bradley, J. P. N. (2014). Japanese English learners on the edge of ‘chaosmos’: Félix Guattari and ‘becoming-otaku’. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations, 13, 83–95.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. New York: Jossey-Bass.
Davison, E., & Price, J. (2009). How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801895695.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1980/1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2006/1977). Dialogues II (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). London: Continuum.
Dosse, F. (2007/2010). Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari: Intersecting lives (D. Glassman, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Fielding, M. (1999). Radical collegiality: Affirming teaching as an inclusive professional practice. Australian Educational Researcher, 26(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03219692.
Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017949213447.
Fielding, M. (2011). Student voice and the possibility of radical democratic education: Re-narrating forgotten histories, developing alternative futures. In G. Czerniawski & W. Kidd (Eds.), The student voice handbook: Bridging the academic/practitioner divide (pp. 3–17). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Freng, S., & Webber, D. (2009). Turning up the heat on online teaching evaluations: Does “hotness” matter? Teaching of Psychology, 36(3), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902959739.
Genosko, G. (2002). Félix Guattari: An aberrant introduction. London: Continuum.
Genosko, G. (2003). Félix Guattari. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 8(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09697250301196.
Genosko, G. (2009). Félix Guattari: A critical introduction. Northhampton: Pluto Press.
Gonzales, L. D., & Núñez, A.-M. (2014). Ranking regimes and the production of knowledge in academia: (Re)shaping faculty work? 2014, 22. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n31.2014.
Gregory, K. M. (2011). How undergraduates perceive their professors: A corpus analysis of Rate My Professor. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.2.g.
Guattari, F. (1989/2013). Schizoanalytic cartographies (A. Goffey, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury.
Guattari, F. (1995a). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Guattari, F. (1995b). On machines. Complexity, 8–12.
Guattari, F. (1996). Remaking social practices. In G. Genosko (Ed.), The Guattari reader (pp. 262–273). Oxford: Blackwell.
Guattari, F. (2000). The three ecologies (I. Pindar & P. Sutton, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.
Hearn, A. (2010). Structuring feeling: Web 2.0, online ranking and rating, and the digital ‘reputation’ economy. Ephemera: Theory and politics in organization, 10(3/4), 421–438.
Kindred, J., & Mohammed, S. N. (2005). “He will crush you like an academic ninja!”: Exploring teacher ratings on Ratemyprofessors.com. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00257.x.
Legg, A. M., & Wilson, J. H. (2012). RateMyProfessors.com offers biased evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2010.507299.
Lewandowski, G. W., Higgins, E., & Nardone, N. N. (2012). Just a harmless website?: An experimental examination of RateMyProfessors.com’s effect on student evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(8), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.594497.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. American Psychologist, 52(11), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1187.
Mayes, E. (under review). Alternatives to end-of-semester student evaluations of teaching: Narrative accounts of tertiary educators committed to inclusive pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education.
Mockler, N., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2015). Engaging with student voice in research, education and community: Beyond legitimation and guardianship. Dordrecht: Springer.
Murphie, A. (2001). Computers are not theatre: The machine in the ghost in Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s thought. In G. Genosko (Ed.), Deleuze and Guattari: Critical assessments of leading philosophers (Vol. III, pp. 1299–1331). London: Routledge.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., Collins, K. M. T., Filer, J. D., Wiedmaier, C. D., & Moore, C. W. (2007). Students’ perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-methods analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 113–160.
Pindar, I., & Sutton, P. (2008). Translators’ introduction. In F. Guattari (Ed.), The three ecologies (pp. 1–11). London: Contimuum.
Ringrose, J. (2015). Schizo-feminist educational research cartographies. Deleuze Studies, 9(3), 393–409. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2015.0194.
Ritter, K. (2008). E-valuating learning: “Rate My Professors” and public rhetorics of pedagogy. Rhetoric Review, 27(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350190802126177.
Stivale, C. J. (2003). Deleuze/ Parnet in Dialogues: The folds of post-identity. The Journal of the Midwest Modern Language Association, 36(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1315396.
Stivale, C. J. (2008). Gilles Deleuze’s ABCs: The folds of friendship. Baltimore, MD.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Subtirelu, N. C. (2015). “She does have an accent but…”: Race and language ideology in students’ evaluations of mathematics instructors on RateMyProfessors.com. Language in Society, 44(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000736.
Uttl, B., White, C. A., & Gonzalez, D. W. (2017). Meta-analysis of faculty’s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007.
Villalta-Cerdas, A., McKeny, P., Gatlin, T., & Sandi-Urena, S. (2015). Evaluation of instruction: Students’ patterns of use and contribution to RateMyProfessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.896862.
Walkerdine, V. (2013). Using the work of Félix Guattari to understand space, place, social justice, and education. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(10), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413502934.
Yoon, K. (2015). Affordances and negotiations of the digital reputation society: A case study of RateMyProfessors.com. Continuum, 29(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.968525.
Acknowledgements
I thank the two anonymous reviewers, the editors, as well as Be Parnell, Monique Dagleish and Julian Sefton-Green for their thoughtful and constructive feedback on an earlier draft of this chapter. The detailed and affirmative tone of the feedback of these readers is particularly appreciated. An earlier version was presented at the 2017 Gender and Education conference at Middlesex University in a symposium chaired by Genine Hook and Melissa Wolfe: Affective Relationality as Response-ability. I thank Genine, Melissa, Christine Gowlett (co-presenter), Yvette Taylor (discussant) and the attendees of this symposium for their engagement and for generative conversations around the issues raised in this paper. These voices are entwined with this chapter’s authorial ‘I’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mayes, E. (2018). The Ontological Plurality of Digital Voice: A Schizoanalysis of Rate My Professors and Rate My Teachers. In: Cole, D., Bradley, J. (eds) Principles of Transversality in Globalization and Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0583-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0583-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0582-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0583-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)