Skip to main content
  • 1037 Accesses

Abstract

Other than some abstract contemplation, contemporary economic literature does not talk much about the nature of the industrial production and investment process, its internal and external actors and the interaction between them. In consequence, economists, when considering the industrialization process and the industrial policy take industrial firm—which is indeed the main agent at the centre of the industrialization process and the recipient of the industrial policy—as a simple, neutral agent. In economic literature, manufacturing activity is thus presented by a production function of some simple mathematical form. In turn, it is implied that the industrialization process progresses in line with a simple physical investment model.

The reality is much more complex, and is the reason why so many countries have failed to industrialize and have fallen into the middle-income trap. The industrialization process is primarily undertaken by industrial firms which are the primary and direct agents of industrialization, and are established and led by industrial entrepreneurs. They employ workers and managers, build factories, develop and manufacture industrial products, and sell them in their respective markets. They seek access to finance and interacy with the regulators. In the process, the industrial firm acts as part of an ecosystem which may be called the ‘industrial layer.’ As certain features of the industrial sector are very different from the primary and tertiary sectors, the industrial layer carries some peculiarities.

The quality of the industrial layer is important in that it determines both the overall competitiveness of the industrial sector and the efficiency and effectiveness of industrial policies. Industrial policies, if designed or implemented without taking into consideration the particular characteristics, weaknesses, and strengths of the industrial layer are likely to fail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Landström (1999).

  2. 2.

    Landström (1999: 10).

  3. 3.

    Schumpeter (1947).

  4. 4.

    Gopakumar (1995: 9).

  5. 5.

    Gerschenkron (1953), Gopakumar (1995), Alexander (1960, 1967), Sagarra (1997).

  6. 6.

    Carland et al. (2002).

  7. 7.

    Alexander (1960).

  8. 8.

    Park-Barjot (2014).

References

  • Alexander, A. P. (1960). Industrial entrepreneurship in Turkey: Origins and growth. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 8(4, Part 1), 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, A. P. (1967). The supply of industrial entrepreneurship. Explorations in Economic History, 4(2), 136–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carland, H., Carland, J. W., & Hoy, F. (2002). Who is an entrepreneur? Is a question worth asking. Entrepreneurship: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, 2, 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1953). Social attitudes, entrepreneurship, and economic development. Explorations in Economic History, 6(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopakumar, K. (1995). The entrepreneur in economic thought: A thematic overview. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoselitz, B. (2008). “The entrepreneurial element in economic development,” in ed. Richard J. Ward, The challenge of development, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, pp. 122–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landström, H. (1999). The roots of entrepreneurial research. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 2(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park-Barjot, R. R. (2014). Samsung: An original case of knowledge transfer in economic organizations. Entreprises et histoire, (2), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagarra, E. (1997). A Social history of Germany. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). The creative response in economic history. The Journal of Economic History, 7(2), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. (1989). Personality characteristics, work values, and life styles of fast-and slow-progressing small-scale industrial entrepreneurs. The Journal of social psychology, 129(6), 801–805.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yülek, M.A. (2018). The Industrial Layer. In: How Nations Succeed: Manufacturing, Trade, Industrial Policy, and Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0568-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0567-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0568-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics