Abstract
The book contains an extensive set of chapters which explain why a research student’s thesis has used a structure differing from the conventional one developed to suit the scientific method. The researchers explain how their findings, methodological approaches, paradigmatic leanings and the theories utilised guided their alternative structures. A common characteristic is that none of the research students use the scientific method, which is why the conventional structure was unsuitable. In this chapter, we reflect on the scientific method to see why it is unsuited to social science research (and indeed not adopted by much scientific research) and the alternative directions which have been taken. We define the scientific method as a linear positivist approach which proceeds from a well-defined question or hypothesis, substantiated by a literature survey, which is then tested. The problem with this positivist approach for the social sciences is that research in these disciplines deals with complex ill-defined issues, which are often so messy that research students find it difficult initially to formulate research questions. Their research, therefore, takes the form of a voyage of discovery. Interpretive researchers recognised the limitations of the scientific method and moved towards more naturalistic forms of research. In the early stages, at least, this tended to imply movement from quantitative to qualitative research. The chapters in the book suggest that over time there has been a degree of shift in interpretive research aiming to derive novel theory, grounded in the data, to interpret a limited case. Many of the researchers in this collection interpret their results in terms of well-established theories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adams, D. (1979). The hitchhikers guide to the galaxy. London: Pan Books.
Apple, M. W. (1979). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.
Archer, M. S. (2001). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics & the entanglement of matter & meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bateson, M. C. (2001). Composing a life (1st ed.). New York: Grove Press.
Battiste, M. A., & Henderson, J. Y. (2000). Protecting indigenous knowledge and heritage: A global challenge. Toronto: Purich Publishing Company (CN).
Berger, P. L. (1963). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. New York: Anchor.
Biesta, G. (2015). On the two cultures of educational research, and how we might move ahead: Reconsidering the ontology, axiology and praxeology of education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904114565162.
Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge, UK ; Malden, MA, USA: Polity.
Cajete, G. (2003). Philosophy of native science. In A. Waters (Ed.), American Indian thought: Philosophical essays (pp. 45–57). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cervone, J. A. (2017). Corporatizing rural education: Neoliberal globalization and reaction in the United States. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cicourel, A. (1967). The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: Wiley.
Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Inc.
Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED012275.
Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. London; New York: Verso.
Connell, R. (1993). Schools & social justice. Toronto: James Lorimer.
Corbett, M., Vibert, A., & Green, M. (2016). Improvising the curriculum: Negotiating risky literacies in cautious schools. New York: Routledge.
Denzin, N. K. (2017). Qualitative inquiry under fire: Toward a new paradigm dialogue. New York and London: Routledge.
Dixson, A. D., & Rousseau, C. K. (2005). And we are still not saved: Critical race theory in education ten years later. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 7–27.
Egan, K. (2002). Getting it wrong from the beginning: Our progressivist inheritance from Herbert Spencer, John Dewey, and Jean Piaget. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the socio-material. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Prentice Hall.
Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method: a positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Giroux, H. A. (1983). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Westport, Conn: Bergin and Garvey.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Gray, C., & MacBlain, S. (2012). Learning theories in childhood. London: Sage.
Green, B., & Hopwood, N. (2015). The body in professional practice, learning and education: Body/practice. Berlin: Springer.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America by Christopher Jencks. New York: Basic Books.
Kadlec, A. (2007). Dewey’s critical pragmatism. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Kember, D. (2003). To control or not to control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 89–101.
Kharpal, A. (2017). Stephen Hawking says AI could be “worst event” in civilization. CNBC Special Report. Retrieved February 21, 2018, from https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/06/stephen-hawking-ai-could-be-worst-event-in-civilization.html.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7–24.
Lather, P. (2004a). This is your father’s paradigm: Government intrusion and the case of qualitative research in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1), 15–34.
Lather, P. (2004b). Scientific research in education: A critical perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 759–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279486.
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York and London: Routledge.
Lefebvre, H. (1992). The production of space (1st ed.). Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lincoln, Y., & Guber, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.
MacLeod, J. (1987). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. New York: Routledge.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago, Ill.; London: The University Of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M., & Carman, T. (2013). Phenomenology of perception. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Middleton, S. (2017). Henri Lefebvre on education: Critique and pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 15(4), 410–426.
Mills, C. W. (1958). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Scott, D. (2010). Education, epistemology and critical realism. London: Routledge.
Semetsky, I. (2006). Deleuze, education and becoming. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. London: ZED Books.
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Publishers.
Tate, W. (1997). Critical race theory and education: History, theory, and implications. Review of Research in Education, 22(1), 195–247. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X022001195.
Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Place in research: Theory, methodology, and methods. New York; London: Routledge.
Vass, G. (2014). The racialised educational landscape in Australia: Listening to the whispering elephant. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 17(2), 176–201.
Watson, J. D. (1969). The double helix: A personal account of the discovery of the structure of DNA. New York: Signet.
Weis, L. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
Willis, P. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs (morningside). New York: Columbia University Press.
Wrong, D. H. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology. American Sociological Review, 26(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089854.
Young, M. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Corbett, M., Kember, D. (2018). Reflections on Methodological Issues. In: Kember, D., Corbett, M. (eds) Structuring the Thesis. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0511-5_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0511-5_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0510-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0511-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)