Skip to main content

A Comparison Between Critical-Plane and Stress-Invariant Approaches for the Prediction of Fretting Fatigue Crack Nucleation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Fracture Fatigue and Wear (FFW 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1528 Accesses

Abstract

The phenomenon of fretting fatigue can cause crack nucleation at the contact interface due to multiaxial loading conditions. The nucleation phase may take a significant proportion of life under fretting fatigue, which leads to micro crack initiation. There are several approaches in vogue to estimate crack initiation life. The current study, however, aims to compare two approaches, namely, Critical Plane (CP) approach and Stress Invariant (SI) approach. Smith Watson Topper (SWT), McDiarmid (MD) parameters, which represent critical plane approach, whereas, Crossland parameter (CL), which represents SI approach, are adopted for this purpose. These parameters are applied to cylinder on a flat configuration and predicted numerical results are also compared with experimental results from literature. It is observed that, under fretting fatigue conditions, life prediction capability of critical plane approach is better than stress invariant approach especially at large number of cycles to failure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hills, D.A., Nowell, D.: Mechanics of Fretting Fatigue. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhatti, N.A., Abdel Wahab, M.: Fretting fatigue crack nucleation: a review. Tribol. Int. 121, 121–138 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lykins, C.D., Mall, S., Jain, V.: An evaluation of parameters for predicting fretting fatigue crack initiation. Int. J. Fatigue 22(8), 703–716 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lykins, C.D., Mall, S., Jain, V.K.: Combined experimental–numerical investigation of fretting fatigue crack initiation. Int. J. Fatigue 23(8), 703–711 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Namjoshi, S.A., et al.: Fretting fatigue crack initiation mechanism in Ti–6Al–4V. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 25(10), 955–964 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Araújo, J.A., Nowell, D.: The effect of rapidly varying contact stress fields on fretting fatigue. Int. J. Fatigue 24(7), 763–775 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhatti, N.A., Abdel Wahab, M.: A numerical investigation on critical plane orientation and initiation lifetimes in fretting fatigue under out of phase loading conditions. Tribol. Int. 115, 307–318 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhatti, N.A., Abdel Wahab, M.: Finite element analysis of fretting fatigue under out of phase loading conditions. Tribol. Int. 109, 552–562 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernardo, A.T., Araújo, J.A., Mamiya, E.N.: Proposition of a finite element-based approach to compute the size effect in fretting fatigue. Tribol. Int. 39(10), 1123–1130 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Navarro, C., Muñoz, S., Domínguez, J.: On the use of multiaxial fatigue criteria for fretting fatigue life assessment. Int. J. Fatigue 30(1), 32–44 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandiolle, C., Garcin, S., Fouvry, S.: A non-collinear fretting-fatigue experiment to compare multiaxial fatigue criteria: critical shear plane strategy is better than invariant formulations. Tribol. Int. 108(Supplement C), 57–68 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Findley, W., Coleman, J., Hanley, B.: Theory for combined bending and torsion fatigue with data for SAE 4340 steel. Technical report No. 1 on basic reseearch on fatigue failures under combined stress. Brown University, Providence. Engineering Materials Research Lab (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Szolwinski, M.P., Farris, T.N.: Mechanics of fretting fatigue crack formation. Wear 198(1–2), 93–107 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Szolwinski, M.P., Farris, T.N.: Observation, analysis and prediction of fretting fatigue in 2024-T351 aluminum alloy. Wear 221(1), 24–36 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, K., Topper, T., Watson, P.: A stress-strain function for the fatigue of metals. J. Mater. 5, 767–778 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McDiarmid, D.L.: A general criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue failure. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 14(4), 429–453 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crossland, B.: Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Fatigue of Metals, pp. 138–149 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hojjati-Talemi, R., et al.: Prediction of fretting fatigue crack initiation and propagation lifetime for cylindrical contact configuration. Tribol. Int. 76, 73–91 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pereira, K., Abdel Wahab, M.: Fretting fatigue crack propagation lifetime prediction in cylindrical contact using an extended MTS criterion for non-proportional loading. Tribol. Int. 115, 525–534 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hourlier, F., et al.: Fatigue crack path behavior under polymodal fatigue. In: Multiaxial Fatigue. ASTM International, Conshohocken (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The first author acknowledges the research scholarship supported by Pakistan government. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO), The Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) and Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) in the framework of the FWO Lead Agency project: G018916 N ‘Multi-analysis of fretting fatigue using physical and virtual experiments’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Bhatti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bhatti, N.A., Pereira, K., Abdel Wahab, M. (2019). A Comparison Between Critical-Plane and Stress-Invariant Approaches for the Prediction of Fretting Fatigue Crack Nucleation. In: Abdel Wahab, M. (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Fracture Fatigue and Wear. FFW 2018. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0411-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0411-8_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0410-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0411-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics