Skip to main content

Dynamic Feature Selection for Spam Detection in Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover International Telecommunications Conference

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 504))

Abstract

Social Networks continue to increase their popularity day by day. With the widespread availability of Internet access, interest of people in social networks has also increased significantly. The fact that, popularity of social media makes it tempting to use social media platforms for bad purposes. Malicious people are attempting to gain unfair profits by using fake accounts and various techniques. Among these initiatives, SPAM is one of the most frequently used methods. Today, SPAM attacks on social networks are increasing and many social network users are exposed to this and similar attacks. To identify SPAM users among billions of social network users, the examination of massive amounts of data requires a challenging large-scale data analysis. In this study, we group similar Twitter users and introduce a dynamic feature selection technique that use different features for each user groups instead of use static feature set and apply machine learning algorithms to classify spam users on Twitter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

  2. Kandasamy KT, Koroth P (2014) An integrated approach to spam classification on Twitter using URL analysis. In: IEEE students’ conference on electrical, electronics and computer science

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaitanya KT, Ponnapalli H, Herts D, Pablo J (2012) Analysis and detection of modern spam techniques on social networking sites. In: Third international conference on services in emerging markets

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abu-Nimeh S, Chen T, Alzubi O (2011) Malicious and spam posts in online social networks. IEEE Comput Soc 44(9)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amit AA, Reddy N, Yadav S, Gu G, Yang C (2013) CATS: characterizing automation of Twitter spammers, communication systems and networks (COMSNETS). Fifth Int Conf 2013:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen C, Guan DJ, Su Q (2015) Feature set identification for detecting suspicious URLs using Bayesian classification in social networks. Inf Sci 289:133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Twitter, 2015, Twitter Kullanımı ve Şirket Verileri, https://about.twitter.com/tr/company, [Ziyaret Tarihi: 27 Ekim 2015].

  8. Wank K, Wang Y, Li H, Zhang X (2011). A new approach for detecting spam microblogs based on text and user’s social network features. In: Proceedings of the VLDB endowment, vol 4, No 12. Seattle, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cao C, Caverlee J (2014) Behavioral detection of spam URL sharing: posting patterns versus click patterns. In: International conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang D (2014) Analysis and detection of low quality information in social networks, PhD symposium of 30th IEEE international conference on data engineering (ICDE 2014). Chicago, IL, United States

    Google Scholar 

  11. Radulescu C, Dinsoreanu M, Potolea R (2014) Identification of spam comments using natural language processing techniques. In: 2014 IEEE 10th international conference on intelligent computer communication and processing

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shen H (2014) Leveraging social networks for effective spam filtering. IEEE Trans Comput 63(11)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Fabricio B, Magno G, Rodrigues T, Almeida V (2010) Detecting spammers on Twitter, collaboration, electronic messaging, anti- abuse and spam conference (CEAS), vol 6. National Academy Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rashhid C, Nuriddin M, Mahmud GAN, Rashedur M (2013) A data mining based spam detection system for YouTube. In: Eighth international conference on digital information management, pp. 373–378

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sarita Y, Daniel R, Grant S, Danah B (2010) Detecting spam in a twitter network. Microsoft Res First Monday, 15(1)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stafford G, Louis LY (2013) An evaluation of the effect of spam on twitter trending topics. IEEE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao Y, Zhaoxiang Z, Yungonh W, Liu J (2012) Robust mobile spamming detection via graph patterns. In: 21st international conference on pattern recognition.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Boykin O, Roychowdhury VP (2005) Leveraging social networks to fight spam. Computer (Impact Factor: 1.44) 38:61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammed B (2011) An unsupervised approach for identifying spammers in social networks. In: 23rd IEEE international conference on tools with artificial intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pelleg D, Moore A (2000) X-means: extending K-means with efficient estimation of the number of clusters. ICML.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is also a part of the M.Sc. thesis titled Big Data Analysis in Social Media at Istanbul University, Department of Computer Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serhan Yarkan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Karakaşlı, M.S., Aydin, M.A., Yarkan, S., Boyaci, A. (2019). Dynamic Feature Selection for Spam Detection in Twitter. In: Boyaci, A., Ekti, A., Aydin, M., Yarkan, S. (eds) International Telecommunications Conference. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 504. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0408-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0408-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0407-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0408-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics