Skip to main content

Importance of Inclusion of Soil–Structure Interaction Studies in Design Codes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 2

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 12))

Abstract

The Indian seismic design code IS:1893 (Part 1) (BIS, 2002) suggests ignoring soil–structure interaction (SSI) studies for seismic design of structures located on rock or rock-like material. However, for a structure resting on soil, it is imperative that the interaction effects be considered during its analysis. The current study is aimed to assess the differences in the design response and analysis outputs arising due to inconsideration of SSI in the analysis for building frames. Reinforced Concrete (RC) building frames supported on pile foundation and embedded in loose sand are considered and finite element analysis is performed using the OpenSees program. Five types of analysis have been carried out to estimate the different design response and analysis output parameters. The study highlights that it may not always be feasible to ignore time history analysis in cases where site response influences the overall response of the building–foundation–soil system. Thus, detailed investigation is required on possible incorporation of dynamic analysis in code-prescribed seismic design procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IS: 1893 (Part I)-2002 (2002) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, fifth revision, Part-1. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL (2006) OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center

    Google Scholar 

  3. IS: 456-2000 (2002) Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete- code of practice, fourth revision. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  4. IS: 2911 (Part I/Sec 1)-1979 (1979) Indian standard code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations, first revision, Part-1, Section 1. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma N, Dasgupta K, Dey A (2016) Finite element modelling studies for SSI studies. In: Proceedings 6th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, 43. IIT Roorkee Extension Center, Greater Noida, India

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elgamal A, Yang Z, Parra E, Ragheb A (2003) Modeling of cyclic mobility in saturated cohesionless soils. Int J Plast 19(6):883–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhlemeyer RL, Lysmer J (1973) Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 99(SM5):421–427

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joyner WB (1975) Method for calculating nonlinear seismic response in 2- dimensions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(5):1337–1357

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Yang Z, Bielak J, Conte JP, Elgamal A (2003) Treatment of seismic input and boundary conditions in nonlinear seismic analysis of a bridge ground system. In: Proceedings of the16th ASCE engineering mechanics conference, pp 16–18. University of Washington, Seattle, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hilber HM, Hughes TJ, Taylor RL (1977) Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 5(3):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chopra AK (1995) Dynamics of structures-theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Pearson Education Inc, Noida, U.P., India

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mukherjee S, Gupta VK (2002) Wavelet-based generation of spectrum compatible ground motions. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 22(9):799–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support and resources provided by Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, and Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD, Government of India) are gratefully acknowledged by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaustubh Dasgupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sharma, N., Dasgupta, K., Dey, A. (2019). Importance of Inclusion of Soil–Structure Interaction Studies in Design Codes. In: Rao, A., Ramanjaneyulu, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 2. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0365-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0365-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0364-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0365-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics