Skip to main content

Improved Sparse High-Dimensional Model Representation Based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 1

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 11))

  • 1706 Accesses

Abstract

The increasing complexity of real-time problems has posed a perpetual challenge to existing simulation models. In particular, such models governing any physical system usually entail long hours of simulation, making them computationally intensive for large-scale problems. In order to mitigate this issue, a novel computational tool has been developed for efficient stochastic computations. The proposed model has been developed by two-tier improvement of the existing approximation techniques. As the first improvement, Kriging (Dubourg et al., in Probab Eng Mech 33: 47–57, 2013, [1]) has been incorporated within high-dimensional model representation (HDMR) (Li et al., in J Phys Chem A 110:2474–2485, 2006, [2]) model so as to enhance approximation capabilities in terms of accuracy. Second, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) (Tibshirani, in 1996, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 58:267–288, [3]) has been utilized and integrated with the refined model so as to construct a sparse HDMR approximation, eventually leading to reduced computational complexity. Implementation of the proposed approach has been demonstrated with two analytical benchmark examples and a 25-element space truss problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., & Deheeger, F. (2013). Metamodel-based importance sampling for structural reliability analysis. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 33, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, G., Hu, J., Wang, S. W., Georgopoulos, P. G., Schoendorf, J., & Rabitz, H. (2006). Random Sampling-High Dimensional Model Representation (RS-HDMR) and orthogonality of its different order component functions. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 110(7), 2474–2485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 58(1), 267–288.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Sudret, B. (2012). Meta-models for structural reliability and uncertainty quantification. In Proceedings of 5th Asian-Pacific Symposium on Structural Reliability and its Applications (APSSRA, 2012), Singapore (pp. 53–76).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chastaing, G., Gamboa, F., & Prieur, C. (2011). Generalized Hoeffding-Sobol decomposition for dependent variables—Application to sensitivity analysis. Stat: Electron. J.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, L., & Li, X. (2015). Multi-element least square HDMR methods and their applications for stochastic multiscale model reduction. Journal of Computational Physics, 294, 439–461.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuan, Q., & Liang, D. (2011). A new multiple sub-domain RS-HDMR method and its application to tropospheric alkane photochemistry model. Numerical Analysis And Modeling, Series B, 2(1), 73–90.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubourg, V., Sudret, B., & Bourinet, M. (2011). Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44(5), 673–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, G., Rosenthal, C., & Rabitz, H. (2001). High dimensional model representation. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 105, 7765–7777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sacks, J., Welch, W., Mitchell, T., & Wynn, H. (1989). Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statistical Science, 4(4), 409–423.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaymaz, I. (2005). Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems. Structural Safety, 27(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubourg, V. (2011). Adaptive surrogate models for reliability analysis and reliability-based design optimization (Ph.D. thesis). Universite Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marrel, A., Iooss, B., Van Dorpe, F., & Volkova, E. (2008). An efficient methodology for modelling complex computer codes with Gaussian processes. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 4731–4744.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., & Conover, W. J. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics, 2, 239–245.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lophaven, S., Nielson, H., & Sondergaard, J. (2002). DACE A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox, IMM-TR-2002-12. Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chakraborty, S., & Chowdhury, R. (2015). A semi-analytical framework for structural reliability analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 289, 475–497.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Sobol, I., & Levitan, Y. (1999). On the use of variance reducing multipliers in Monte Carlo computations of a global sensitivity index. Computer Physics Communications, 117, 52–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tavassoli, A., Haji Hajikolaei, K., Sadeqi, S., Wang, G. G., & Kjeang, E. (2014). Modification of DIRECT for high-dimensional design problems. Engineering Optimization, 46(6), 810–823.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Chakraborty, S., & Chowdhury, R. (2015). Multivariate function approximations using the D-MORPH algorithm. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(23–24), 7155–7180.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajib Chowdhury .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chatterjee, T., Chowdhury, R. (2019). Improved Sparse High-Dimensional Model Representation Based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator. In: Rao, A., Ramanjaneyulu, K. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 1. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 11. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0362-3_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0362-3_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0361-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0362-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics