Skip to main content

Developing Texts that Match Readers’ Abilities in the Sciences: Seeking an Appropriate Instructional Level

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
English Education in Oman

Part of the book series: English Language Education ((ELED,volume 15))

Abstract

This chapter discusses one approach to developing materials for Omani science students that seeks to bridge the gap between authentic science texts and student reading abilities by adapting texts to match those abilities and building on them in ways that are grounded in L1 and L2 research. It begins with a description of the context in which the materials have been developed and the problems encountered by learners and teachers that initially motivated their development. Next, there is a description of the process that was followed in developing the texts and their respective units of study. The third part discusses two methods used to evaluate the piloting of the units: a study into the percentage of unknown words encountered by the student population and a feedback form given to teachers who used the piloted units. The chapter concludes with a discussion about some of the most important issues of text development that arose from this project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Busaidi, S. (2007). Assessing active and passive vocabulary knowledge. In P. Davidson, C. Coombe, D. Lloyd, & D. Palfreyman (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary in another language (pp. 298–310). Dubai, United Arab Emirates: TESOL Arabia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, E. K. (1982). The effect of syntax on readability for ESL students in Puerto Rico. TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), 517–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahalan, C. (2003). Oral reading fluency and optimal difficulty level in a literature based reading curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, P. L. (1987). Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4(1), 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claridge, G. (2005). Simplification in graded readers: Measuring the authenticity of graded texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 144–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. A., Louwerse, M. L., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. Modern Language Journal, 91(2), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing L2 reading texts at the intermediate level: An approximate replication of Crossley, Louwerse, McCarthy, & McNamara (2007). Language Teaching, 41(3), 409–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum Unit. (2013). Foundation program English curriculum document. Muscat, UK: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, S. (1997). Interacting with authentic texts: Multilayered processes. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (1998). Background knowledge, linguistic complexity, and second-language reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(2), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, P., & Carrell, P. L. (1987). Effects on ESL reading of teaching cultural content schemata. Language Learning, 37(1), 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory into practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. D., Louwerse, M. L., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal., 55(4), 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heatly, A., Nation, I. S. P., & Coxhead, A. (2002)..RANGE and FREQUENCY programs. Retrieved from http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/staff/paul-nation

  • Hsueh-chao, M. H., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 327–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, T. W. (1987). Text modifications in ESL reading comprehension. RELC Journal, 18(2), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (2005). Instructed second language vocabulary learning: The fault in the ‘default hypothesis’. In A. Housen (Ed.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 311–329). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter & Co. KG Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2004). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. In E. V. Smith Jr. & R. M. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to Rasch measurement: Theory, models and applications (pp. 258–278). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2014a). Winsteps-Ministeps: Rasch model computer programs program manual. Beaverton: Winsteps.com.

  • Linacre, J. M. (2014b). Winsteps (version 3.81.0) [software]. Beaverton: Winsteps.com.

  • Long, M., & Ross, S. (1993). Modifications that preserve language and content. In M. L. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and applications (pp. 29–52). Singapore, Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2011). ESL reading textbooks vs. university textbooks: Are we giving students the input they may need? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, F. (2004). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Portland, OR: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P., & Deweerdt, J.-P. (2001). A defense of simplification. Prospect, 16(3), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, S. (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: Simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24(1), 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, T. V. (2013). Exploring text difficulty and matching texts for reading achievement. Education Matters,1(2), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaffar, J. K. (1985). Reading authentic texts in a foreign language: A cognitive model. Modern Language Journal, 69(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2011). Introduction: Principles and procedures of materials development. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 1–34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treptow, M. A., Burns, M. K., & McComas, J. J. (2007). Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effects on student’s reading comprehension and time on task. School Psychology Review, 36(1), 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweissi, A. I. (1998). The effects of the amount and type of simplification on foreign language reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 191–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Win-a-rom, U. (2010). Self-assessment of word knowledge with graded readers: A preliminary study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(2), 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, D. (2010). Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 558–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Noone, R.L. (2018). Developing Texts that Match Readers’ Abilities in the Sciences: Seeking an Appropriate Instructional Level. In: Al-Mahrooqi, R., Denman, C. (eds) English Education in Oman. English Language Education, vol 15. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0265-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0265-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0264-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0265-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics