Advertisement

Tasks: Effective Ways of Accommodating Learners’ Identities in Higher Education Oman

  • Muhammed Ali Chalikandy
Chapter
Part of the English Language Education book series (ELED, volume 15)

Abstract

Learners in higher education in Oman, like learners the world over, have multiple identities and mixed abilities. Therefore, neither a whole class approach nor one-on-one teaching can always be truly effective as the former neglects individual differences in the classroom and the latter is not practical because of the large number of students. Individualized teaching requires meticulous preparation and careful planning; furthermore, classroom management becomes a great concern. Given the nature of these challenges, this chapter argues that task-based learning/teaching can accommodate learners’ multiple identities and individual learner differences and needs in the classroom as tasks provide learning opportunities for each individual learner and can create supportive group work situations by encouraging learners to interact with their peers. This chapter offers examples of some of the ways in which tasks can be employed to accommodate Omani higher education learners’ multiple identities and differences in the process of learning a second or foreign language.

Keywords

Individual Identity Tasks Learning Learner differences 

References

  1. Beebe, L. (1983). Risk taking and language learner. In H. Seligar & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 39–65). Rowlas, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  2. Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35(4), 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed language learning and task-based teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 713–730). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Fotos, S. (2002). Structure-based interactive tasks for the EFL grammar learner. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 135–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Ha, P. L. (2008). Teaching English as an international language: Identity, resistance, negotiation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  6. Hay, J. (1917). Complete poetical works of John hay. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kidd, W. (2002). Culture and identity. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  10. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task-based instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lochana, M., & Deb, G. (2006). Task-based teaching: Learning English without tears. The Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 140–164.Google Scholar
  13. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition: Annals of the New York academy of sciences (pp. 259–278). New York: New York Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  14. McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pavlenko, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (Eds.). (2000). Second language learning as participation and reconstruction of selves. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  21. Porter, P. A. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task centered discussion. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200–222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  22. Prabhu, N. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Richards, J. C. (1985). The context of language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, P. J. (2011). Task-based language learning. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Ruso, N. (1999). Influence of task based learning on EFL classrooms. Asian EFL Journal, 18, 1–23.Google Scholar
  26. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning teaching. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  28. Siegal, M. S. (1994). Looking east: Learning Japanese as a second language in Japan and the interaction of race, gender and social context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99–118). Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, L. B. (2011). Examining speaking: Research and practice in assessing second language speaking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tomlinson, B. (2005). English as a foreign language: Matching procedures to the context of learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 137–153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2001). Task-based language learning. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 173–179). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammed Ali Chalikandy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishAl Buraimi University CollegeAl BuraimiOman

Personalised recommendations