Abstract
This chapter presents recent changes in Japanese higher education policy and analyzes its impact on higher education institutions in the post-massification era. It can be assumed that in the twenty-first century, economic forces will increasingly demand the production of new knowledge and the development of personnel through universities. No governments will be able to continue meeting such social demands for higher education without relatively abundant financing. Without question, Japan faces the same challenge. Both the private and public sectors of higher education in Japan will continue to confront limited financing, and issues of accountability will continue to emerge. In such environment, government control becomes stronger every than before. The issue of university governance has become a matter of extreme importance. Then, IR (institutional research) has been regarded as the effective tool for assisting university governance. As a result, IR offices will most likely become charged with the concrete responsibilities of collecting, quantifying and visualizing various types of internal university information, as well as managing such data in order to help the decision-making process for university governance. We conducted the nationwide survey for IR function for all Japanese four-year universities in 2014. This study will show the results of the survey and analyze the new role of IR of JHE. Then, this paper explores whether or not IR functions to support university governance in Japanese university and what kind of challenges we face in the post-massification stage.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
“The University Portrait”, a database system, was introduced by the leadership of the MEXT in 2014. All higher education institutions are supposed to provide basic data to this database like IPEDS in the United States in order to respond to the demand for information disclosure.
- 3.
For the details, please see http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/daigaku/04052801/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/11/18/1353488_1.pdf.
References
Berdahl, R. O., & McConnell, T. R. (1994). Autonomy and accountability: Some fundamental issues. In P. G. Altbach, R.O. Berdahl, & P. J. Gumport (Eds.), Higher education in American society (pp. 55–72). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Hawkins, J. N., Mok, K. H., & Neubauer, D. (2018). The many faces of Asia Pacific higher education in the era of massification. In A. M. Wu & J. N.Hawkins (Eds.), Massification of higher education in Asia: Consequences, policy responses and changing governance (pp. 1–9). Singapore: Springer.
https://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2013/12/17/obama-administration-seeks-input-how-develop-ratings. Accessed on Septemper 19, 2015.
Maassen, P. A. M. (1986). Institutional research and organizational adaptation. Paper presented at the Eighth European AIR Forum, Loughborough, England.
Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2005). Interrogating global flows in higher education. Globalization, societies and education, 3(3), 281–310.
MEXT. (2010). http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/daigaku/04052801/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/11/18/1353488_1.pdf.
Oki, K. (2009). IR in private university in Japan, 2008 IR survey report for private university in Japan. Tokyo: Waseda University.
Peterson, M. W., & Corcoran, M. (1985). Proliferation or professional integration: Transition and transformation. New Directions for Institutional Research, 11(2), 5–15.
Saupe, J. L. (1990). The functions of institutional research (2nd ed.). Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research.
Takada, E., et al. (2012). The survey of IR sections in national university corporation. University Information and Institutional Research Report (pp. 53–120). Fukuoka: Kyushu University.
Trow, M. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Policy for Higher Education, OECD, 51–101.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of American higher education. Report of the Commission Appointed by Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
Van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. (1994). Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 28, 355–371.
Volkwein, J. F. (1990). The diversity of institutional research structures and tasks. New Directions for Institutional Research, 66, 7–26.
Volkwein, J. F. (1999). The four faces of institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 104, 9–19.
Yung-chi, A. H. (2012). Impact of excellence programs on Taiwan higher education in terms of quality assurance and academic excellence, examining the conflicting role of Taiwan’s accrediting agencies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 77–88.
Zumeta, W. M. (2011). What does it mean to be accountable? Dimensions and implications of higher education’s public accountability. The Review of Higher Education, 35(1), 131–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yamada, R., Yamada, A. (2018). Higher Education Governance and Institutional Research: The Emergence of a New Role in the Post-massification Era in Japan. In: Wu, A., Hawkins, J. (eds) Massification of Higher Education in Asia. Higher Education in Asia: Quality, Excellence and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0248-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0248-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0246-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0248-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)