Skip to main content

Credibilistic TOPSIS Model for Evaluation and Selection of Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Waste Management

Abstract

Municipal solid waste management (MSWM) is a challenging issue of urban development in developing countries. Each country having different socio-economic-environmental background might not accept a particular disposal method as the optimal choice. Selection of appropriate disposal method of MSW under vague and imprecise information usually considered and solved as a multicriteria decision-making problem (MCDM). In the present paper, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methodology is extended based on credibility theory for evaluating the performances of MSW disposal methods against some criteria fixed by experts. A numerical example is provided to demonstrate the usefulness of our proposed model. From the final outcomes, decision makers can recommend the preferable choice for MSW disposal methodologies for their municipal area. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to verify the robustness of our proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khan, S., Faisal, M.N.: An analytic network process model for municipal solid waste disposal options. Waste Manag. 28(9), 1500–1508 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Minghua, Z., Xiumin, F., Rovetta, A., Qichang, H., Vicentini, F., Bingkai, L., Yi, L.: Municipal solid waste management in Pudong New Area, China. Waste Manag. 29(3), 1227–1233 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, N., Yadav, K.K., Kumar, V.: A review on current status of municipal solid waste management in India. J. Environ. Sci. 37, 206–217 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogu, V.I.: Private sector participation and municipal waste management in Benin City, Nigeria. Environ. Urban. 12(2), 103–117 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Promentilla, M.A.B., Furuichi, T., Ishii, K., Tanikawa, N.: Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process. Waste Manag. 26(12), 1410–1421 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Charnpratheep, K., Zhou, Q., Garner, B.: Preliminary landfill site screening using fuzzy geographical information systems. Waste Manage. Res. 15(2), 197–215 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hung, M.L., Ma, H.W., Yang, W.F.: A novel sustainable decision making model for municipal solid waste management. Waste Manag. 27(2), 209–219 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. In: Lecture Notes in Economic and Mathematical Systems. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khoo, L., Tor, S., Zhai, L.: A rough-set based approach for classification and rule induction. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 15(6), 438–444 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence (Vol. 1, pp. xiii + 297). Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Sci. 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jahanshahloo, G.R., Lotfi, F.H., Izadikhah, M.: Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Appl. Math. Comput. 181(2), 1544–1551 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, T.Y., Tsao, C.Y.: The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159(11), 1410–1428 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chatterjee, K., Kar, S.: Multi-criteria analysis of supply chain risk management using interval valued fuzzy TOPSIS. OPSEARCH, 1–26 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ye, F., Li, Y.: An extended TOPSIS model based on the possibility theory under fuzzy environment. Knowl.-Based Syst. 67, 263–269 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, B.: Uncertain Theory: An Introduction to Its Axiomatic Foundation. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag. Sci. 17(4), B-141 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ekmekçioğlu, M., Kaya, T., Kahraman, C.: Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 30(8), 1729–1736 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, C.T., Lin, C.T., Huang, S.F.: A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 102(2), 289–301 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our deepest appreciation to the Editors and the anonymous reviewers. The first author extends his sincere thanks to the Department of Science and Technology, India, for their financial support under INSPIRE Fellowship for Ph.D. program with the research grant no. DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2013/544.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishnendu Adhikary .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roy, J., Adhikary, K., Kar, S. (2019). Credibilistic TOPSIS Model for Evaluation and Selection of Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Methods. In: Kalamdhad, A., Singh, J., Dhamodharan, K. (eds) Advances in Waste Management . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0215-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics