Abstract
China’s changing urban development policies and urban landscapes in the transition from socialist to a market economy have been focused on entrepreneurialism and elite-dominance. However, with decentralization as a major feature of changes in governance in China in recent years, differences among localities in approaches to the planning and development of city regions are found to be diverse. Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan Province, is proving to be an exceptional case in its approaches toward inclusiveness in decision-making, access to land, and its relationships with its rural hinterlands. Based on policies and programs adopted by local government to narrow urban-rural disparities in Chengdu, this paper explores the progressive features of governing of Chengdu from an analytical assessment of reflexive interrelationships among land property reform, participatory governance, and grassroots democracy. The central question addressed is whether or not and how the adopted land property reform enhances the involvement of residents in participatory governance and the rise of local grassroots democracy. The case of Chengdu shows that even in a state-dominated political system, progressive features are gradually becoming apparent and prominent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The Fish Scale Atlas was originated from the Ming Dynasty to facilitate tax collection. It is used to measure the land of each state and county and then catalog the pieces of land in the forms of maps in a land atlas like fish scales. And the atlas was known as the Fish Scale Atlas (Ye and LeGates 2013).
References
Cabannes, Y., & Zhuang, M. (2014). Participatory budgeting at scale and bridging the rural−urban divide in Chengdu. Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813509146.
Cabannes, Y. (2016). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 27–46.
Cai, F., & Tao, Y. (2000). Political economics on urban-rural inequality. Social Science. China, 4, 11–22 (In Chinese).
Chen, Y. (2012). Rural governance institutional exploration: Survey from village evaluation council (cunzhuang pingyihui) of Chengdu of Sichuan. Rural Economy, 2012, 10 (in Chinese).
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2007). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2007. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2008). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2008. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2009). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2009. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2010). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2010. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2011). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2011. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2012). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2012. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2013). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2013. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2014). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2014. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Chengdu Statistics Bureau (CSB). (2016). Chengdu statistics yearbook, 2016. Chengdu: Chengdu Statistics Press.
Ding, C. (2007). Policy and praxis of land acquisition in China. Land Use Policy, 24(1), 1–13.
Douglass, M. (2016a). The rise of progressive cities in Asia: Toward human flourishing in Asia’s urban transition (p. 248). Singapore: Asia Research Institute Working Paper Series No.
Douglass, M. (2016b). From Good City to Progressive City: Reclaiming the urban future in Asia. In H. Rangan, M. K. Ng, J. Chase, & L. Porter (Eds.), Insurgencies and revolutions: Reflections on John Friedmann’s contributions to planning theory and practice. Routledge (in press).
Fan, Y., Wu, Y., Wu, A. M., & Wang, W. (2018). Decentralised governance and empowerment of county governments in China: Betting on the weak or the strong? Local Government Studies, 1–27.
Jiang, Z. (2002). Building a well-off society and opening up a new situation of socialist career with Chinese characteristics (in Chinese). People’s Daily., November, 8, 2002.
Kanbur, R., & Zhang, X. B. (2005). Fifty years of regional inequality in China: A journey through central planning, reform, and openness. Review of Development Economics, 9(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00265.x.
Lin, G. C., & Ho, S. P. (2005). The state, land system, and land development processes in contemporary China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00467.x.
Lin, G. C. S. (2009). Developing China: Land, politics, and social conditions. London: Routledge.
Lin, G. C., & Yi, F. (2011). Urbanization of capital or capitalization on urban land? Land development and local public finance in urbanizing China. Urban Geography, 32(1), 50–79.
Matthews, R. C. (1986). The economics of institutions and the sources of growth. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 903–918.
Naisbitt, J., & Naisbitt, D. (2012). Innovation in China: The Chengdu triangle. Tianjin: The Naisbitt China Institute.
Ng, M. K., & Xu, J. (2000). Development control in post-reform China: The case of Liuhua Lake Park. Cities, 17(6), 409–418.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge university press.
Qin, B. (2015). City profile: Chengdu. Cities, 43, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.006.
Schotter, A. (1981). The economic theory of social institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ye, Y., & LeGates, R. (2013). Coordinating urban and rural development in China: Learning from Chengdu. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press.
Ye, Y., LeGates, R., & Qin, B. (2013). Coordinated urban-rural development planning in China. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2), 125–137.
Zhou, Y. (2012). Chengdu, the future of Garden City, economic observer paper. 2012. September, 21. (in Chinese) http://news.sohu.com/20091222/n269109259.shtml Accessed 10 June 2017.
Zhu, J. (2002). Urban development under ambiguous property rights: A case of China’s transition economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00362.
Zhu, J. (2004). Local developmental state and order in China’s urban development during transition. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(2), 424–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00527.x.
Zhu, J. (2005). A transitional institution for the emerging land market in urban China. Urban Studies, 42(8), 1369–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500150714.
Zhu, J., & Guo, Y. (2013). Fragmented Peri-urbanisation led by Autonomous Village development under informal institution in high-density regions: The case of Nanhai, China. Urban Studies, 51(6), 1120–1145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yi, F. (2019). Land Reform, Participatory Governance, and Grassroots Democracy in Progressive Chengdu, China. In: Douglass, M., Garbaye, R., Ho, K. (eds) The Rise of Progressive Cities East and West. ARI - Springer Asia Series, vol 6. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0209-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0209-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0208-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0209-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)