Skip to main content

The Rise of Progressive Cities East and West

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Rise of Progressive Cities East and West

Part of the book series: ARI - Springer Asia Series ((ARI,volume 6))

Abstract

The rise of progressive cities is an invitation to understand the conditions that enable progressive modes of participatory governance that expand the right to the city in the pursuit of social justice. The focus on progressive cities is essential as cities are rapidly becoming key sites of policy-making in the contemporary world. In contrast to national levels, governance at city scales can more readily foster democratic and vital day-to-day links between government, civil society, and business interests. We stress the different paths taken toward progressive governance, paths marked by democratizing national politics in East Asia and long-standing local democratic participation in Europe. As the studies show, cities are found to be progressive in different ways, and some are experiencing serious junctures that are impeding the gains they have made. The chapter concludes by showing how the 13 city studies of the book are organized along three themes. Theme 1 incorporates the overviews, conceptualizations, and practices in the making of progressive cities. Theme 2 includes chapters that examine specific urban policies focused on inclusion and distributive justice. The authors of chapters brought together in theme 3 explore the idea of conviviality and the associational life of city residents and nonresidents at community and city scales. Discussions of the urban commons, vernacular heritage, and relations with the natural environment are included to show how motives other than those for material gain also arise from grassroots mobilizations and local governance politics aimed at enhancing of urban lifeworlds. The chapters in this book provide hopeful as well as cautionary tales about struggles for progressive cities. Our intention is not to prove that a given city is progressive in any absolute way. It instead uses the lens of our concept of progressive cities to comparatively assess processes of urban governance in the world today and, in so doing, contribute to shifting the discourse on cities toward ideas of human flourishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asia Development Bank (ADB). (2014). Sustainable Urbanization in Asia and Latin America. Manila: ADB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, A. (2012). Refugees: Social precarity and soul in 21st century Japan. Anthropological Quarterly, 85(2), 345–370. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcadis. (2017). Sustainable cities index 2017. https://www.arcadis.com/media/0/6/6/%7B06687980-3179-47AD-89FD-F6AFA76EBB73%7DSustainable%20Cities%20Index% 202016%20Global%20Web.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, B. R. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, D. (2001). A localist critique of the New Federalism. Duke Law Journal, 51(1), 377–433. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol51/iss1/9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caponio, T., & Bokert, M. (2010). The local dimension of migration policy-making. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg, M., & Pope, C. (2017). Climate of hope – How cities, businesses, and citizens can save the Planet. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2014). Urban worlds – the “Urban Age” in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 731–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, M., & Velayutham, S. (Eds.). (2009). Dissent and cultural resistance in Asia’s cities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780401600104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprotti, F. (2014). Eco-urbanism and the Eco-city, or, denying the Right to the City? Antipode, 46(5), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavel, P. (1986). The progressive city, planning and participation, 1969–1984. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavel, P. (2010). Activists in City Hall: The progressive response to the Reagan Era in Boston and Chicago. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clavel, P. (2016). What’s the progressive city? http://progressivecities.org/whats-the-progressive-city-3/. Accessed 3 June 2017.

  • Daniere, A., & Douglass, M. (Eds.). (2008). Building urban communities: The politics of civic space in Asia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, M. (2009). Globopolis or cosmopolis? Alternative futures of city life in East Asia. Studies in Urban Humanities, 2, 67–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, M. (2013). Decentralizing governance in a transborder urban age: East Asia and the Busan–Fukuoka “Common living sphere”. Pacific Affairs, 86(4), 731–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, M. (2016a). ACSP distinguished educator: John Friedmann. Journal of Education and Planning Research, 36(2), 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16645361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, M. (2016b). From good city to progressive city: reclaiming the urban future in Asia. In H. Rangan, M. K. Ng, J. Chase, & L. Porter (Eds.), Insurgencies and Revolutions: Reflections on John Friedmann's contributions to planning theory and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, M., Ho, K. C., & Ooi, G. L. (Eds.). (2010). Globalization, the city and the rise of civil society – The social production of civic spaces in Pacific Asia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duara, P. (2014). The crisis of global modernity: Asian traditions and a sustainable future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2012). Benchmarking global city competitiveness. London: The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. S. (2005). Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05279275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fieldman, G. (2011). Neoliberalism, the production of vulnerability and the hobbled state: Systemic barriers to climate adaptation. Climate and Development, 3(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2011.582278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, J., & Robinson, D. (Eds.). (2008). Community cohesion in crisis? New dimensions of diversity and difference. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2000). The good city: In defense of utopian thinking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2011). Insurgencies: Essays in planning theory. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garbaye, R. (2005). Getting into local power: The politics of ethnic minorities in British and French cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, R., & Domhoff, G. W. (2009). The leftmost city: Power and progressive politics in Santa Cruz. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, M., 2014. The rise of the progressive city. The Nation. April 2. http://www.thenation.com/article/rise-progressive-city/. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R., & Raco, M. (Eds.). (2003). Urban renaissance? New labour, community and urban policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B. (2014). Nixon’s New Federalism 45 Years Later, Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2014/08/11/nixons-new-federalism-45-years-later/ . Accessed 28 May 2017.

  • Keith, M. (2005). After the cosmopolitan? Multicultural cities and the future of racism. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, T. C. (2012). The CLC framework: Urban solutions. Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC), Singapore. http://www.clc.gov.sg/. Accessed 1 July 2017.

  • Le Galès, P. (2003). Le retour des villes Européennes, societies urbaines, mondialisation, government et gouvernance. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L. (2014). The death of sustainable communities in London. In R. Imrie & L. Lees (Eds.), Sustainable London? The future of a global city (pp. 149–172). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Lloyd-Jones, T., & Allen, J. (Eds.). (2010). Social sustainability in urban areas: Communities, connectivity and the urban fabric. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, H. (2015). The revolt of the cities, American Prospect. http://prospect.org/article/revolt-cities. Accessed 26 Sept 2015.

  • Mumford, L. (1961). The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York: Harcout, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P., & Hogan, T. (2012). Discordant order: Manila’s neo-patrimonial Urbanism. Thesis Eleven, 112(1), 10–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513612450500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nag, R. M. (2012). Transforming Asia: Realizing the Asian century through good governance. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/227797521200100102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, S. R. (2014). Politics of multiculturalism in east Asia: Reinterpreting multiculturalism. Ethnicities, 14(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796813498078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peattie, L. (1998). Conviviality. In M. Douglass & J. Friedmann (Eds.), Cities for citizens: Planning and the rise of civil society in a global age (pp. 247–253). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinson, G. (2009). Gouverner la Ville par Projet: Urbanisme et Gouvernance des Villes Européennes. Paris: Presses de Sciences-Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. (2016). Brazil’s critique of the Habitat III “Zero Draft” of The New Urban Agenda. RIOONWATCH. http://www.rioonwatch.org/?p=33186. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.

  • Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis—Planning for multicultural cities. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandercock, L., & Lyssiotis, P. (2003). Cosmopolis II: Mongrel cities of the 21st century. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schragger, R. (2013). Is a progressive city possible? Reviving urban liberalism for the twenty-first century. Harvard Law Review, 7, 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seixas, J., & Albet, A. (Eds.). (2012). Urban governance in southern Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukra, K. (1998). The changing pattern of black politics, in Britain. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2011). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Super, D. (2005). Rethinking fiscal federalism. Harvard Law Review, 118(8), 2544–2561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallon, A. (2010). Urban regeneration in the UK. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trading Economics. (2017). Japan’s Population. https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/population. Accessed 6 June 2017.

  • United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). (2016). The state of Asian cities. Bangkok: UNESCAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (UNWCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain (Working Paper n° 25 of the Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS)). Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. (2004). Democratization and the left: Comparing East Asia and Latin America.Comparative Political Studies, 37(10), 1213–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004269824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yap, O. F. (2013). Economic performance and democratic support in Asia’s emergent democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 46(4), 486–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Douglass .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Douglass, M., Garbaye, R., Ho, K.C. (2019). The Rise of Progressive Cities East and West. In: Douglass, M., Garbaye, R., Ho, K. (eds) The Rise of Progressive Cities East and West. ARI - Springer Asia Series, vol 6. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0209-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0209-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0208-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0209-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics