Abstract
Knowledge sector actors do not exist in a vacuum. They are immersed in a web of rules and regulations that define how they link and interact with each other, what funding can be accessed for procuring and generating evidence and where space is available to allow evidence to influence plans and policies. This chapter examines the policies, procedures and practices that govern/shape the production of knowledge and its use in policymaking in Indonesia. The chapter begins by examining some of the challenges that inhibit the production and use of research to inform policymaking. It then discusses two examples of reforms that improved the country’s enabling environment for evidence-informed policymaking: funding for scientific and policy research and regulations governing government procurement of research. These reforms have expanded the space for producing quality, policy-relevant research and enabled policymakers to commission research from universities and policy research organisations. The authors describe the process and policy changes that led to the establishment of the Indonesia Science Fund and revised procurement regulations. The chapter concludes with suggestions about regulatory changes that may be still be required to continue reform in Indonesia’s knowledge sector enabling environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The chapter uses the Bahasa Indonesia acronym KemRistekDikti to refer to the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education (Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi).
- 3.
The Indonesia Science Fund in Bahasa Indonesia is called Dana Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (DIPI). The chapter uses the English language wording.
- 4.
The chapter uses the Bahasa Indonesia acronym AIPI to refer to the Indonesian Academy of Sciences (Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia).
- 5.
The chapter uses the acronym LKPP to refer to the National Goods/Services Public Procurement Agency (Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang Jasa Pemerintah).
- 6.
This section draws on Emont and Pellini (2017).
- 7.
This section draws on Jackson et al. (2017
References
Agenor, P. R., Canuto, O., & Jelenic, M. (2012). Avoiding middle income growth traps (World Bank. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Series. Number 98). The World Bank.
AIPI [Indonesian Academy of Sciences]. (2014). Indonesian-American Kavli Frontiers of Science symposia 2011–2013. Jakarta: AIPI.
AIPI [Indonesian Academy of Sciences]. (2016). In https://aipi.or.id/index.php?pg=detilpublikasi&pid=58&type=2. Accessed 9 June 2017 (Ed.), SAINS45: Indonesian science agenda -towards a century of independence. Jakarta: AIPI.
AIPI [Indonesian Academy of Sciences]. (2017). Indonesian Academy of Sciences annual report 2016. Jakarta: AIPI. https://aipi.or.id/index.php?pg=isidata&jurnal=65. Accessed 9 June 2017.
AusAID [Australian Agency for International Development]. (2012). Australia-Indonesia partnership for pro-poor policy: The knowledge sector initiative, design document. http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/indo-ks-design.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2014.
Brodjonegoro, S. S., & Greene, M. P. (2012). Creating an Indonesian science fund. Jakarta: AIPI and World Bank. https://aipi.or.id/index.php?pg=detilpublikasi&pid=19&type=3. Accessed 9 June 2017.
Carden, F. (2016). Reflections on academies and science advice (Working Paper 13). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. http://www.ksi-indonesia.org/en/news/detail/reflections-on-academies-and-science-advice. Accessed 24 June 2017.
Denney, L. (2016). Reforming solid waste management in Phnom Penh (The Asia Foundation and the Overseas Development Institute. Working Politically in Practice Series. Case Study No. 8). London: Overseas Development Institute. http://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Working-Politically-and-Flexibly-to-Reform-Solid-Waste-Management-in-Phnom-Penh.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2017.
Emont, J. & Pellini, A. (2017). Investing in knowledge: The establishment of the Indonesian science fund (Working Paper 20). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. http://www.ksi-indonesia.org/en/news/detail/investing-in-knowledge-the-establishment-of-the-indonesian-science-fund. Accessed 20 June 2017.
Faustino, J. & Booth, D. (2014). Development entrepreneurship: how donors and leaders can foster institutional change (Working Politically in Practice Series – Case Study No. 2). London: Overseas Development Institute and San Francisco: The Asia Foundation.http://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Development-Entrepeneurship-How-Donors-and-Leaders-Can-Foster-Institutional-Change.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2017.
Government of Indonesia. (1990). Law 8/1990 on the Indonesian Academy of Sciences. http://www.hukumonline.com/pusatdata/detail/19965/node/671/undangundang-nomor-8-tahun-1990. Accessed 17 Apr 2018.
Guggenheim, S. (2012). Indonesia’s quiet springtime: Knowledge, policy and reform. In A. Reid (Ed.), Indonesia rising. The repositioning of Asia’s third giant (pp. 141–169). Institute of Southeast Asian Studies: Singapore.
Hearn, S. (2014). Outcome mapping practitioner guide: Alignment, interest, influence matrix. London: Overseas Development Institute. http://www.outcomemapping.ca/nuggets/alignment-interest-influence-matrix. Accessed 12 Mar 2017.
Heathfield, S. M. (2016, August 26). Trust rules: The most important secret about trust, about.com. http://humanresources.about.com/od/workrelationships/a/trust_rules.htm. Accessed 9 June 2017.
Jackson, E., Prasetiamartati, B., Sadikin, M. C., Sugiyanto, and Pellini, P. (2017). Commissioning knowledge for policy reforms in the procurement of research in Indonesia (Working Paper 23). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. http://www.ksi-indonesia.org/file_upload/Commissioning-Knowledge-for-Policy-Reforms-in-the-14Jun2017160257.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2017.
Jakarta Post. (2015, December 16). RI should focus on e-economy study: Djisman. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/12/16/ri-should-focus-e-economy-study-djisman.html. Accessed 9 June 2017.
Karetji, P.C. (2010). Overview of the Indonesian knowledge sector. Jakarta: AusAID. Available at http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/indo-ks8-overview.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2017.
McCarthy, J. & Ibrahim, R. (2010). Review of social science capacity building support to Indonesia’s knowledge sector. Jakarta: AusAID. http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/indo-ks9-socialscience.pdf. Accessed 5 June 2017.
National Research Council & AIPI. (2013). Reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Washington DC: National Academies Press. https://aipi.or.id/index.php?pg=isidata&jurnal=24. Accessed 9 June 2017.
Nugroho, Y., Prasetiamartati, B., Ruhanawati S. (2016). Addressing Barriers to University Research (Working Paper No. 8). Knowledge Sector Initiative. http://www.ksi-indonesia.org/en/news/detail/addressing-barriers-to-university-research. Accessed 9 June 2017.
Prasetiamartati, B. (2016). End of intervention report: Capacity development for AIPI and the establishment of the Indonesia science fund (Internal report). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative.
Prasojo, E. (2016, January 7). One Year On: The turning point of bureaucracy reform. http://ekoprasojo.com/2016/01/07/one-year-on-the-turning-point-of-bureaucracy-reform/. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.
Sherlock, S. (2010). Knowledge for policy: Regulatory obstacles to the growth of a knowledge market in Indonesia. Jakarta: AusAid. https://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/indo-ks13-knowledge-to-govt.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2017.
Sherlock, S. & Djani, L. (2015). Update on constraints in the enabling environment to the provision of knowledge in the executive and legislative government (KSI diagnostic study). Jakarta: Knowledge Sector Initiative. http://www.ksi-indonesia.org/en/news/detail/update-on-constraints-in-the-enabling-environment-to-the-provision-of-knowledge-in-executive-and-legislative-government. Accessed 9 June 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prasetiamartati, B., Carden, F., Sugiyanto (2018). Reforming the Enabling Environment for Evidence-Informed Policymaking. In: Pellini, A., Prasetiamartati, B., Nugroho, K., Jackson, E., Carden, F. (eds) Knowledge, Politics and Policymaking in Indonesia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0167-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0167-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0166-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0167-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)