Effect of Shape of Pore Forming Agent on Structure and Properties of Aluminum Foams

  • Bensheng Huang
  • Xing Zhao
  • Chenglong Gong
  • Ziyu Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)


The aluminum foams was prepared by powder sintering method. Internal pores were made of spherical urea particles or bar-shaped urea particles, and the influence of this factor was studied. The internal structure and composition of the aluminum foams were measured by SEM and XRD, then the effects of the shape of pore forming agent on the porosity, compressive property and energy absorption efficiency were researched. Finally, the micro-residual stress in the aluminum foams was calculated. The results show: the porosity of the aluminum foams is slightly lower than the volume fraction of urea particles after the sintering process; the maximum micro-residual stress of aluminum foams with spherical urea particles is 47.22 MPa and the maximum micro-residual stress of aluminum foams with bar-shaped urea particles is 57.38 MPa; the aluminum foams with spherical urea particles is more stable than the others, the compressive strength of the aluminum foams with spherical urea particles is also stronger; when entering the platform area, the energy absorption efficiency of aluminum foams with spherical urea particles is obviously higher, and its maximum efficiency of energy absorption is 71.9%.


Aluminum foams Urea particle Compression properties Micro residual stress 



This work was financially supported by Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Oil & Gas Equipment (Fund Number OGE201402-02) and Key Projects of Sichuan Provincial Education Department (Project Number 15ZA0057).


  1. 1.
    H. Tang et al., Effect of pore structure on performance of porous metal fiber materials. Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 44(8), 1821–1826 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.-P. Lefebvre, J. Banhart, D.C. Dunand, Porous metals and metallic foams: current status and recent developments. Adv. Eng. Mater. 10(9), 775–787 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Benjamin, U.S. Patent 2,434,775, 1948Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Wang et al., Study on preparing techmque of the open pores foam aluminum using investment casting process. Foundry 20(1), 8–10 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Liu et al., Applications of porous metal materials. J. Funct. Mater. 32(2), 12–15 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Wang, Analysis of production process and application of foamed aluminum. Nonferrous Metals Proc. 3, 11–13 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Jiang, Y. Liu, Y. Si, Properties of open cell aluminum foams prepared by space-holder method. Heat Treat. Metals. 32(3), 33–35 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Antenucci et al., Improvement of the mechanical and thermal characteristics of open cell aluminum foams by the electrodeposition of Cu. Mater. Des. 59, 124–129 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Q.Z. Wang et al., Compressive behaviors and energy-absorption properties of an open-celled porous Cu fabricated by replication of NaCl space-holders. J. Mater. Process. Tech. 211(3), 363–367 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Nciri, Cellular metals manufacturing. Am. Machinist 6(3), 117–126 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.D. Cullity, W.W. John, Elements of X-ray diffraction. Am. J. Phys. 25(6), 394–395 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Han, Z. Zhu, The mechanical behavior of foamed aluminum. J. Mater. Sci. 34(2), 291–299 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Hunt, U.S. Patent 4,258,889, 1981Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bensheng Huang
    • 1
  • Xing Zhao
    • 1
  • Chenglong Gong
    • 1
  • Ziyu Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringSouthwest Petroleum UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations