Skip to main content

‘What Have I Done?’: An Exploration of the Ambivalent, Unimaginable Emotions of New Motherhood

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Paths to Parenthood

Abstract

First-time expectant mothers are bombarded with all manner of information about what new parenthood is like and how it should be done. These sometimes dialogic, sometimes competing scripts shape expectations but often fall short in adequately preparing mothers-to-be for what is to come. This chapter explores the disunity between pre-birth expectations and the lived bodily experience of new parenthood. Mothers report a range of emotional responses to new parenthood that often do not fit with the dominant romantic narratives that have been constructed around baby making including anxiety, anger, guilt, and grief. The chapter finds that this disconnect between expectations and experience compounds these negative emotions and also encourages women to individualise and pathologise their emotional experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (1970). Ideology and the state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In L. Althusser (1971), Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, I. (2001). On not speaking Chinese: Living between Asia and the West. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1192–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among executive women. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, P., Henshaw, C., Baker, S., & Tree, J. (2005). Supermum, superwife, supereverything: Performing femininity in the transition to motherhood. Journal of Infant and Reproductive Psychology, 23, 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, K. (2012). Extensive mothering: Employed mothers’ constructions of the good mother. Gender & Society, 26(1), 73–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deave, T., Johnson, D., & Ingram, J. (2008). Transition to parenthood: The needs of parents in pregnancy and early parenthood. BMC Pregnancy and Childhood, 8(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, C., & Chung-Lee, L. (2006). Postpartum depression help-seeking barriers and maternal treatment preferences: A qualitative systematic review. Birth, 33(4), 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow, D. (2016). Integrated motherhood: Beyond hegemonic ideologies of motherhood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 18–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, S., & Huppatz, K. (2010). Mother making class distinctions: The aesthetics of maternity. In S. Goodwin & K. Huppatz (Eds.), The good mother: Contemporary motherhoods in Australia. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarre, J. (1997). The mother knot. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2013). Feminism, family and the new ‘mediated’ maternalism. New Formations, 80, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.3898/newF.80/81.07.2013.

  • McRobbie, A. (2015). Notes on the perfect. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(83), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. (2007). ‘Is this what motherhood is all about?’ Weaving experience and discourse through transition to first time motherhood. Gender & Society, 21, 337–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E., & Van Willigen, M. (1996). Gender, parenthood, and anger. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 572–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J., & Alwin, D. F. (1989). Gender differences in parental strain: Parental role or gender role? Journal of Family Issues, 10, 482–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2008). Why the maternal now? Published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/whythematernal.pdf.

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Huppatz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Huppatz, K. (2018). ‘What Have I Done?’: An Exploration of the Ambivalent, Unimaginable Emotions of New Motherhood. In: Kokanović, R., Michaels, P., Johnston-Ataata, K. (eds) Paths to Parenthood. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0143-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0143-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0142-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0143-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics