Experimental Set-up of the Toroid and Hemi-ball Penetrometers

Conference paper

Abstract

The toroid and hemiball penetrometers described in this paper are new site investigation tools that have been developed to measure pipe-soil interaction parameters in situ, at shallow depth in the seabed. This paper reports an experimental program using the new in situ penetrometers, and also a conventional pipe segment, which was conducted at the University of Western Australia. The testing campaign included tests carried out under 1 g and 25 g centrifuge conditions. The 1 g testing were performed on the basis that self-weight effects are essentially negligible for the sliding failure that accompanies axial pipe movements or torsion. The centrifuge toroid testing is considered to provide the most reliable and valuable data to support the deployment of the new penetrometers. The testing was developed to provide data that spans the ranges of toroid/pipe in-service behaviour – including toroid/pipe laying, consolidation after overloading is applied and toroid/pipe axial movement. The focus of the testing program described in this paper was on the further examination of the functionality of the new penetrometer, and to illustrate how much shallow penetrometers could be used for assessing the interaction between pipeline and the seabed.

Keywords

Toroid penetrometer Hemi-ball penetrometer 1 g testing Centrifuge testing Axial displacement 

References

  1. 1.
    Yan, Y., White, D.J., Randolph, M.F.: Investigation into novel shallow penetrometers for fine-grained soils. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, pp. 321–326 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yan, Y., White, D.J., Randolph, M.F.: Penetration resistance and stiffness factors for hemispherical and toroidal penetrometers in uniform clay. Int. J. Geomech. ASCE 11(4), 263–275 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan, Y., White, D.J., Randolph, M.F.: Cyclic consolidation and axial friction for seabed pipelines. Géotechnique Lett. 4, 165–169 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yan, Y.: Novel methods for characterizing pipe-soil interaction forces in situ in deep water. Ph.D. thesis, The Univesity of Western Australia (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor, R.N.: Geotechnical Centrifuge Technology. Blackie Academic Press, Glasgow (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wood, D.M.: Geotechnical Modelling. Spon Press/Taylor & Francis, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Randolph, M.F., Jewell, R.J., Stone, K.J.L., Brown, T.A.: Establishing a new centrifuge facility. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Centrifuge Modelling – Centrifuge, vol. 91, Broulder, Colorado (1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watson, P.G.: Performance of skirted foundations for offshore structures. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Western Australia (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Catania, S., Breen, J., Gaudin, C., White, D.J.: Development of a multiple-axis actuator control system. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics, Perth, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaudin, C., White, D.J., Boylan, N., Breen, J., Brown, T.A., De Catania, S., Hontion, P.: A wireless data acquisition system for centrifuge model testing. Measur. Sci. Technol. 20, 095709 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheong, J.: Physical testing of jack-up footings on sand subjected to torsion. Final year undergraduate thesis, Final year undergraduate thesis, The University of Western Australia (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stewart, D.P.: Lateral loading of piled bridge abutments due to embankment construction. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Western Australia (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Lab of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and SafetyTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations