Advertisement

Experimental Research on Dynamic Characteristics of Rubber Model Soil

  • Rongji Xia
  • Haohao Wei
  • Guobo Wang
  • Hang Xiao
  • Shuo Peng
Conference paper

Abstract

In order to meet the bearing capacity of shaking table and reduce the distortion of similarity of soil-structure stiffness, remolded soil such as rubber model soil consists of rubber particles and the intact clay has been widely used in the process of shaking table model test. Different proportion of rubber powder soil and rubber particle soil were arranged to conduct a resonance column test to determine their dynamic characteristics and compare with the dynamic characteristics of the intact clay. The experimental results show that the two models’ changing regulation of the dynamic shear modulus and dynamic damping ratio is consistent with that of pure soil, which indicates that both models can reflect the dynamic characteristics of pure soil and can be used in model test. And the dynamic shear modulus and dynamic damping ratio of the rubber model soil decreased with the increase of rubber particle size. The test results can provide reference for similar test in the future.

Keywords

Rubber model soil Dynamic characteristics Resonance column test Dynamic shear modulus Dynamic damping ratio 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, J.N.: Seismic Design of Tunnels: A Simple State of the Art Design Approach. Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., New York (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kitada, Y., Hirotani, T., Iguchi, M.: Models test on dynamic structure–structure interaction of nuclear power plant buildings. Nucl. Eng. Des. 192(2), 205–216 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turan, A., Hinchberger, S.D., Naggar, H.E.: Design and commissioning of a laminar soil container for use on small shaking tables. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29(2), 404–414 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moss, R., Crosariol, V., Kuo, S.: Shake table testing to quantify seismic soil-structure-interaction of underground structures. In: Fifth International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, pp. 24–29 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tabatabaiefar, R., Fatahi, B., Samali, B.: Numerical and experimental investigations on seismic response of building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction. Adv. Struct. Eng. 17(1), 109–130 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hokmabadi, A.S., Fatahi, B., Samali, B.: Physical modeling of seismic soil-pile-structure interaction for buildings on soft soils. Int. J. Geomech. 15(2), 04014046-1–04014046-18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yan, X., Yuan, J., Yuan, Y., et al.: Study on model soil of large-scale shaking table test. Struct. Eng. 31(5), 116–120 (2015). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yan, X., Haitao, Y., Yuan, Y., et al.: Multi-point shaking table test of the free field under non-uniform earthquake excitation. Soils Found. 55(5), 986–1001 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuan, Y., Yu, H., Li, C., et al.: Multi-point shaking table test for long tunnels subjected to non-uniform seismic loadings – part I: theory and validation. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 108, 177–186 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, H., Yuan, Y., Xu, G., et al.: Multi-point shaking table test for long tunnels subjected to non-uniform seismic loadings - part II: application to the HZM immersed tunnel. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 108, 187–195 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yan, X., Yuan, J., Yu, H., et al.: Multi-point shaking table test design for long tunnels under non-uniform seismic loading. Tunnel. Undergr. Space Technol. Inc. Trenchless Technol. Res. 59, 114–126 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu, H., Yan, X., Bobet, A., et al.: Multi-point shaking table test of a long tunnel subjected to non-uniform seismic loadings. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 16, 1–19 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, H.-K., Santamarina, J.C.: Sand–rubber mixtures (large rubber chips). Can. Geotech. J. 45(10), 1457–1466 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, C., Truong, Q.H., Lee, W., et al.: Characteristics of rubber-sand particle mixtures according to size ratio. Mater. Civ. Eng. 22(4), 323–331 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deng, A., Feng, J.: Influence of tire rubber particles on shear properties of sand. J. PLA Univ. Sci. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 10(5), 483–487 (2009). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shang, S., Sui, X., Zhou, Z., et al.: Experimental study on the dynamic shear modulus of rubber granule - sand mixture. Rock Soil Mech. 31(2), 377–381 (2010). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu, X., Liu, Z., Zhang, Z., et al.: Test of the influence of rubber powder on dynamic characteristics of remolded loess. J. Chang’an Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 33(4), 62–67 (2013). (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rongji Xia
    • 1
  • Haohao Wei
    • 2
  • Guobo Wang
    • 2
  • Hang Xiao
    • 1
  • Shuo Peng
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Hubei Key Laboratory of Roadway Bridge and Structure EngineerWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations