Permeability Comparison of MgO-carboanted Soils and Cement-Treated Soils

  • Guang-Hua Cai
  • Song-Yu Liu
  • Guang-Yin Du
  • Liang Wang
  • Chuan Qin
Conference paper

Abstract

Carbonation of reactive magnesia (MgO) is employed for treating soft soils, which has received attention in the ground improvement as an innovative technology. However, no literature on the permeability of reactive MgO-carbonated soils has been studied. Based on the previous research, this paper focuses on the permeability coefficient of reactive MgO-carbonated soils and PC-treated soils. Through the laboratory permeability tests, the influence of reactive MgO content, carbonation time, initial water content and CO2 ventilation pressure on the permeability coefficient of carbonated silt and silty clay was systematically studied. Moreover, the permeability coefficient of PC-treated soils was used for comparison under the same conditions of MgO content and initial water content. The results show that: the permeability coefficient of reactive MgO-carbonated soils reduces with the MgO content increasing, it is the same magnitude with that of PC-treated soils at the same dosage; and the permeability coefficient of carbonated silt is obviously larger than that of carbonated silty clay. When both the MgO-stabilized silt and silty clay are carbonated for 6.0 h, the corresponding permeability coefficient could reach the minimum (10−6 m/s). Ventilation pressure has little effect on the permeability coefficient of reactive MgO-carbonated soils, which is slightly smaller when the ventilation pressure is 200 kPa. Therefore, the reactive MgO-carbonated soils have similar impermeability with PC-treated soils, and have a good prospect of popularization and application.

Keywords

Magnesia Carbonation Cement Silt Silty clay Permeability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support of NSFC (41330641, 51279032), National key research and development projects (2016YFC0800201).

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, S.Y., Du, Y.J., Yi, Y.L., Puppala, A.J.: Field investigations on performance of T-Shaped deep mixed soil cement column–supported embankments over soft ground. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 138(6), 718–727 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Disfani, M., Arulrajah, A., Haghighi, H., Mohammadinia, A., Horpibulsuk, S.: Flexural beam fatigue strength evaluation of crushed brick as a supplementary material in cement stabilized recycled concrete aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 68, 667–676 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sukmak, P., Horpibulsuk, S., Shen, S.L., Chindaprasirt, P., Suksiripattanapong, C.: Factors influencing strength development in clay-fly ash geopolymer. Constr. Build. Mater. 47, 1125–1136 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horpibulsuk, S., Phetchuay, C., Chinkulkijniwat, A., Cholaphatsorn, A.: Strength development in silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash. Soils Found. 53, 477–486 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harrison, A.J.W.: Reactive magnesium oxide cements. United States Patent 7347896 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liska, M., Al-Tabbaa, A.: Ultra-green construction: reactive magnesia masonry products. Proc. ICE-Waste Res. Manag. 162(4), 185–196 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liska, M., Al-Tabbaa, A., Carter, K., Fifield, J.: Scaled-up commercial production of reactive magnesium cement pressed masonry units. Part I: Prod. Proc. ICE-Constr. Mater. 165(4), 211–223 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai, G.H., Liu, S.Y., Du, Y.J., Zhang, D.W., Zheng, X.: Strength and deformation characteristics of carbonated reactive magnesia treated silt soil. J. Cent. South Univ. 22(5), 1859–1868 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cai, G.H., Du, Y.J., Liu, S.Y., Singh, D.N.: Physical properties, electrical resistivity and strength characteristics of carbonated silty soil admixed with reactive magnesia. Can. Geotech. J. 52(11), 1699–1713 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yi, Y.L., Liska, M., Unluer, C., Al-Tabbaa, A.: Carbonating magnesia for soil stabilization. Can. Geotech. J. 50(8), 899–905 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cai, G.H., Liu, S.Y., Cao, J.J.: Influence of initial water content on strength and electrical resistivity of MgO-carbonated silt. China J. Highw. Transp. 11(30), 18–26 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, S.Y., Li, C.: Influence of MgO activity on the stabilization efficiency of carbonated mixing method. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 37(1), 148–155 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zheng, X., Liu, S.Y., Cai, G.H., Cao, J.J.: Experimental study on freeze-thaw properties of carbonated reactive MgO-stabilised soils. J. Southeast Univ. (Natural Sci. Ed.) 45(3), 595–600 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zheng, X., Liu, S.Y., Cai, G.H., Cao, J.J.: Experimental study on drying-wetting properties of carbonated reactive MgO-stabilised soils. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 38(2), 297–304 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, S.Y., Zheng, X., Cai, G.H., Cao, J.J.: Study on resistance to sulfate attack of carbonated reactive MgO-stabilised soils. Rock Soil Mech. 37(11), 3057–3064 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hou, Y.F., Gong, X.N.: Permeability properties of cement soils. J. Zhejiang Univ. (Eng. Sci.) 34(2), 189–193 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guang-Hua Cai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Song-Yu Liu
    • 2
  • Guang-Yin Du
    • 2
  • Liang Wang
    • 2
  • Chuan Qin
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Geotechnical EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations