Evaluating the Compatibility of PA11 Pipe with Oil Field Media Based on Tensile Tests

  • Nan Ding
  • Meng Zhang
  • Houbu Li
  • Xiang Zhang
  • Ke Cai
  • Bin Wei
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


In recent years, a large number of thermoplastic pipes have been used in onshore oil fields of china in order to solve the corrosion problem of traditional carbon steel pipelines. However the domestic investigations on compatibility evaluation of thermoplastic materials with oil field media are just at the preliminary stage. Therefore, PA11 was chosen to study compatibility according to ISO 23936-1 standard. And influences of various factors on tensile test results were analyzed in order to optimize test parameters. Exposure tests were carried out in five kinds of simulated environments that were representative in the oil field service, and tensile tests were carry out in accordance with ISO 527 standard. The results showed that: ISO 23936-1 standard was confirmed to be an effective method of evaluating compatibilities of thermoplastic materials quantitatively; the tensile properties obtained from original PA11 material were in agreement with the data released by material supplier; the elongation of specimens decreased significantly after exposure tests, which indicates that the material’s toughness decreased; PA11 was compatible to all the test environments except the H2S-containing, judged by changes of tensile properties. RSDs (relative standard deviation) of test data showed that stress test precision of specimens was better than that of strain and modulus. And suggestions for tensile test were given as the following: (1) specimens should be flat and straight in order to ensure the precision of strain test; (2) low test speed, such as 1 mm/min should be used to ensure that modulus could be calculated precisely.


PA11 Thermoplastic Compatibility Oil field Tensile test 



The authors wish to thank ARKEM for supply sample pipes for this investigation.


  1. 1.
    L. Simon, R. MacDonald, K. Goerz, M. Grigis, Corrosion failure in a lined sour gas pipeline—part 1: case history of incident. Paper presented at NACE NAWC 2010, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 15–18 February 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.R. Ruschau, Novel polymers for applications as liners. Paper NACE00780 presented at the 55th annual conference and exposition, Orlando, Florida, USA, 26–31 March 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM D2837-13e1 Standard Test Method for Obtaining Hydrostatic Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Materials or Pressure Design Basis for Thermoplastic Pipe Products (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, United States, 2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9080:2012 Plastics Piping and Ducting Systems—Determination of the Long-term Hydrostatic Strength of Thermoplastics Materials in Pipe Form by Extrapolation, 2nd edn. (ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    NACE International, NACE TM0298-2003 Standard Test Method Evaluating the Compatibility of FRP Pipe and Tubular with Oilfield Environments, 1st edn. (NACE International, Houston, Texas, United States, 2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 23936-1:2009 Petroleum, Petrochemical and Natural Gas Industries—Non-metallic Materials in Contact with Media Related to Oil and Gas Production—Part 1: Thermoplastics, 1st edn. (ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 527-2:2012 Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 2: Test Conditions for Moulding and Extrusion Plastics, 2nd edn. (ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Organization for Standardization, ISO 527-1:2012 Plastics—Determination of Tensile Properties—Part 1: General Principles, 2nd edn. (ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    N. Ding, K. Cai, X. Zhang, H. Li, Research on applicability of plastic alloy in oilfield sour aqueous environment. China Plast. Ind. 45(1), 25–27, 52 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Poduška, P. Hutař, J. Kučera, A. Frank, J. Sadílek, G. Pinter, L. Náhlík, Residual stress in polyethylene pipes. Polym. Test. 54, 288–295 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Poduška, J. Kučera, P. Hutař, M. Ševčík, J. Křivánek, L. Náhlík, Residual stress distribution in extruded polypropylene pipes. Polym. Test. 40, 88–98 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.E. Janson, Plastic Pipes for Water Supply and Sewage Disposal, 3rd edn. (Stockholm, Borealis, 1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.G. Williams, J.M. Hodgkinson, A. Gray, The determination of residual stresses in plastic pipe and their role in fracture. Polym. Eng. Sci. 21(13), 822–828 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    E.Q. Clutton, J.G. Williams, On the measurement of residual stress in plastic pipes. Polym. Eng. Sci. 35(17), 1381–1386 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Chaoui, A. Chudnowsky, A. Moet, Effect of residual stress on crack propagation in MDPE pipes. J. Mater. Sci. 22(11), 3873–3879 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nan Ding
    • 1
  • Meng Zhang
    • 2
  • Houbu Li
    • 1
  • Xiang Zhang
    • 1
  • Ke Cai
    • 1
  • Bin Wei
    • 1
  1. 1.CNPC Tubular Goods Research InstituteState Key Laboratory of Performance and Structural Safety for Petroleum Tubular Goods and Equipment MaterialsXi’anChina
  2. 2.Xi’an Shiyou UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations