Advertisement

Leadership: Enabling Leadership in the Teaching and Learning of History in Higher Education

  • Adele NyeEmail author
  • Jennifer Clark
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter considers the importance of leadership in creating an environment in which history teaching can flourish and evolve. It argues that ‘enabling leadership’ is a way to support individual and collegial endeavour that reinvigorates professional commitment within the context of the managerial revolution.

References

  1. Barnett, R. (2011). The idea of the university in the twenty-first century: Where’s the imagination? Yüksekogretim Dergisi: Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 88–94.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, D. (2013). How SoTL-active faculty members can be cosmopolitan assets to an institution. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 1(1), 35–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.35.
  3. Booth, A. (2014). History teaching at its best: Historians talk about what matters, what works what makes a difference. Borrowash, UK: Rippleround Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, D., Schnellert, L., & MacNeil, K. (2015). Collaborative inquiry and distributed agency in educational change: A case study of a multi-level community of inquiry. Journal of Educational Change, 16(1), 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833.014.9227.z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Corrigan, J. (2013). Distributed leadership: Rhetoric or reality? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 66–71.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2013.748479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Currie, J. (2010). The effects of globalisation on 1990s academics in greedy institutions. Melbourne Studies in Education, 37(2), 101–128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17508489609556286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davison, A., Brown, P., Pharo, E., Warr, K., McGregor, H., Terkes, S., et al. (2013). Distributed leadership: Building capacity for interdisciplinary climate change teaching at four universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(1), 98–110.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2012-0091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eacott, S. (2011). New look leaders or new look at leadership? International Journal of Educational Management, 25(2), 134–143.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541111107560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jones, S., Harvey, M., Lefoe, G., & Ryland, K. (2014). Synthesising theory and practice: Distributed leadership in higher education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 603–619.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knight, P. T., & Trowler, P. R. (2000). Department-level cultures and the improvement of learning and teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 69–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Marcketti, S., VanDerZanden, A., & Leptien, J. (2015). SoTL Champions: Leveraging their lessons learned. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  12. Nye, A. (2010, July). Conversations with History postgraduates and early career academics: Stories of professional development and emergent identity. Paper Presented at the Australian Historical Association Biennial Conference, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Nye, A. (2013). Consolidating strengths and innovations: An investigation of national standards and units in History at the University of New England. Unpublished report prepared for School of Humanities, University of New England, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  14. Nye, A. (2016, May 24–25). Shaping the discipline: Teaching history in Australian Universities. Bielefeld: Teaching History in Higher Education, Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
  15. Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to lead in higher education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smardon, D., & Charteris, J. (2012). Between a rock and a hard place: Teacher professional learning. New Zealand Journal of Teacher’s Work, 9(1), 27–35.Google Scholar
  17. Trigwell, K., & Felton, P. (2011). Is SoTL good for faculty professional development?, Paper Presented at Transforming the Academy through the Theory & Practice of SOTL, Wisconsin, US. www.indiana.edu/~issotl/past_issotl/FeltenTrigwellISSOTL11.ppt.
  18. Winslett, G. (2016). The struggle to satisfy need: Exploring the institutional cues for teaching support staff. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 38(5), 534–549.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2016.1196928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Woods, P. (2004). Democratic leadership: Drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(1), 3–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1360312032000154522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zepke, N. (2007). Leadership, power and activity systems in a higher education context: Will distributive leadership serve in accountability driven world? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), 301–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120601181514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia
  2. 2.University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations