TLO 6: Examine Historical Evidence, Scholarship and Changing Representations of the Past

  • Sean ScalmerEmail author


Australian historians have long placed the examination of historical evidence, scholarship and changing representations of the past at the centre of their teaching. This chapter reviews the history of Australian practice, foregrounds the innovative approaches of the New Left generation and contemplates recent challenges to prevailing methods, especially those driven by the changing university sector and the changing orientations of students. This chapter critically examines major responses to these challenges, particularly the increasing emphasis on ‘doing history’ in the classroom. It argues that ‘doing history’ activities must continue to connect scholarship, representation and evidence, and should not be limited to the exclusive analysis of primary evidence.


  1. Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Calder, L. (2006). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. Journal of American History, 92(4), 1358–1370. Scholar
  3. Hughes-Warrington, M. (2015). Not going, not listening either: Lecture recording did not kill the live lecture. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from
  4. Lambert, C. (2012). Twilight of the lecture. Harvard Magazine, March-April 2012, pp. 23–27. Retrieved October 11, 2016, from
  5. Macintyre, S. (1994). A history for a nation: Ernest Scott and the making of Australian history. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Macintyre, S., & Clark, A. (2003). The history wars. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Sargent Wood, L. (2012). Hooked on inquiry: History labs in the methods course. The History Teacher, 45(4), 549–566.Google Scholar
  8. Shoemaker, N. (2009). Where is the history lab course? Perspectives on History, January 2009, Retrieved October 3, 2016, from
  9. Sipress, J. M. (2004). Why students don’t get evidence and what we can do about it. The History Teacher, 37(3), 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sipress, J. M., & Voelker, D. J. (2011). The end of the history survey course: The rise and fall of the coverage model. Journal of American History, 97(4), 1050–1066. Scholar
  11. Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Westhoff, L. M. (2012). Historiographic mapping: Towards a signature pedagogy for the methods course. Journal of American History, 98(4), 1114–1126. Scholar
  13. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations