Advertisement

TLO 2: Demonstrate an Understanding of a Variety of Conceptual Approaches to Interpreting the Past

  • Zora SimicEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter firstly argues that teachers should communicate a well-guided, yet flexible understanding of what constitutes a ‘conceptual approach to interpreting the past’ that is able to evolve and deepen as students progress through their history degree, as well as animate interest in the discipline. Each level of university teaching then presents its own opportunities and challenges in terms of introducing students to a broad range of conceptual approaches. Secondly, through three case studies that cover three levels of university teaching and three distinct fields of historiography, it is argued that it is easier to embed a variety of conceptual approaches to the past in course content than to assess students in terms of their capacity to demonstrate comprehension of these. Nevertheless, with inductive teaching and a strong conceptual basis for each course, students should be able, by semester’s end, to demonstrate ‘an understanding of a variety of conceptual approaches to interpreting the past’ in both explicit and implicit ways. As such, the onus is on teachers to assess student work in a nuanced, course-specific and student-centred fashion, rather than apply crude measures of attainment.

References

  1. Bayly, C. A. (2004). The birth of the modern world 1780–1914: Global connections and comparisons. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Booth, A. (2003). Teaching history at university. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brawley, S., Clark, J., Dixon, C., Ford, L., Nielsen, E., Ross, S., et al. (2015). History on trial: Evaluating learning outcomes through audit and accreditation in a national standards environment. Teaching and Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 3(2), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. M. (1999). Gandhi-a Victorian gentleman: An essay in imperial encounter. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 27(2), 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, J., & Nye, A. (2015). ‘Surprise me!’ The (im) possibilities of agency and creativity within the standards framework of history education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1104231.
  6. Curthoys, A., & Docker, J. (2005). Is history fiction?. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
  7. d’Abrera, B. (7, January 2017). A new breed of historian. The Spectator. http://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/01/new-breed-historian/.
  8. First Year Learning Thresholds, Good Practice Poster. (2015). http://www.firstyearlearningthresholds.edu.au/resources/history-tlo2-good-practice-poster/.
  9. Garton, S. (2004). Histories of sexuality: From antiquity to sexual revolution. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  10. Hage, G. (1998). White nation: Fantasies of white supremacy in multicultural society. Sydney: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mazlish, B., & Iriye, A. (Eds.). (2005). The global history reader. NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Nye, A., Hughes-Warrington, M., Roe, J., Russell, P., Peel, M., Deacon, D., … & Kiem, P. (2009). Historical thinking in higher education: Staff and student perceptions of the nature of historical thinking. History Australia, 6(3), 73.1–73.15.  https://doi.org/10.2104/ha090073.
  13. Partner, N., & Foot, S. (Eds.). (2013). The SAGE handbook of historical theory. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Retz, T. (2015). The structure of historical inquiry. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1101365.
  15. Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical politics of sexuality. In Carol Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267–319). London: Pandora.Google Scholar
  16. Rubin, G. (2011). Blood under the bridge: Reflections on ‘thinking sex’. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 17(1), 15–48.Google Scholar
  17. Skinner, K. (2014). Bridging gaps and jumping through hoops: First-year history students’ expectations and perceptions of assessment and feedback in a research-intensive UK university. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 13(4), 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stearns, P. N. (2003). Treating globalization in history surveys. The History Teacher, 36(3), 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stearns, P. N. (2012, July 25). Rethinking the long 19th century in world history: Assessments and alternatives. World History Connected, 9(3), 34 pars. http://worldhistoryconnected.press.illinois.edu/9.3/forum_stearns.html.
  20. Young, R. J. C. (2001). Postcolonialism: An historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Wotherspoon, G. (2016). Gay Sydney: A history. Sydney: New South.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations