Advertisement

TLO 1: Demonstrate an Understanding of at Least One Period or Culture of the Past

  • David LudvigssonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Teaching an historical period is both easy and very difficult. Because content knowledge about past societies, processes, peoples and events is vast, we cannot cover it all in a single course. Therefore, every teacher must define the central content to be taught and learned. This chapter discusses principles for selecting content and suggests that the key question is: what do students need to learn? Considering the limited number of teaching hours in the modern university, scaffolding remains an important function of teaching history, helping students to understand central aspects of the period in question. But equally as important, the classroom should be treated as an opportunity to engage the students and to entice them into the world of the past. Drawing on a course on the early modern period taught at a Swedish university, this chapter suggests a number of ways this could be done including strategies such as the crafted use of questions, designing learning activities on difficult content and varying forms for teaching. The aim is to make students active learners.

References

  1. Ammert, N. (2015). History as knowledge: Ethical values and meaning in encounters with history. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, S. D. (2009, March). Structuring the past: Thinking about the history curriculum. Journal of American History, 95, 1094–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, C., Schmied, L., & Schrick, J. C. (2008, August). The role of emotion in teaching and learning history: A scholarship of teaching exploration. The History Teacher, 41(4), 437–452.Google Scholar
  4. Boyle, A., Maguire, S., Martin, A., Milsom, C., Nash, R., Rawlinson, S., et al. (2007). Fieldwork is good: The student perception and the affective domain. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2), 299–317.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260601063628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brook, T. (2008). Vermeer’s hat: The seventeenth century and the dawn of the global trade. London: Profile.Google Scholar
  6. Byrom, J., & Riley, M. (2003). Professional wrestling in the history department: A case study in planning the teaching of the British Empire at Key Stage 3. Teaching History, 112, 6–14.Google Scholar
  7. Calder, L. (2006, March). Uncoverage: Toward a signature pedagogy for the history survey. The Journal of American History, 1358–1370.  https://doi.org/10.2307/4485896.
  8. Charap, L. G. (2015). Assessing historical thinking in the redesigned advanced placement United States history course and exam. In K. Ercikan & P. Seixas (Eds.), New directions in assessing historical thinking (pp. 159–170). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Counsell, C. (2000). Historical knowledge and historical skills. A distracting dichotomy. In J. Arthur & R. Phillips (Eds.), Issues in history teaching (pp. 54–71). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Grant, S. G. (2003). History lessons. Teaching, learning, and testing in U. S. high school classrooms. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Graves, M. F., & Avery, P. G. (1997, May/June). Scaffolding students’ reading of history. Social Studies, 88(3), 134–138.Google Scholar
  12. Gross, Magdalena H. (2014). Struggling to deal with the difficult past: Polish students confront the Holocaust. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(4), 441–463.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2014.923513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris McArthur, L., & Girard, B. (2014). Instructional significance for teaching history: A preliminary framework. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 38(4), 215–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2014.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kornblith, G., & Lasser, C. (Eds.). (2001, March). Teaching the American History Survey at the opening of the twenty-first century: A round table discussion. Journal of American History, 87, 1409–1441.Google Scholar
  15. Kornfeld, E. (1993). Representations of history: Role-playing debates in college history courses. In R. Blackey (Ed.), History Anew: Innovations in the teaching of history today. California State UP: Long Beach.Google Scholar
  16. Kroeker, G. G. (2015). Experiential learning in the early modern history classroom. Sixteenth Century Journal, XLV(4), 1014–1018.Google Scholar
  17. Lindquist, D. H. (2008, September–October). Developing holocaust curricula: The content decision-making process. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, 82(1), 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ludvigsson, D. (2012). Student perceptions of history fieldwork. In D. Ludvigsson (Ed.), Enhancing student learning in history: Perspectives on university history teaching (Vol. 48, pp. 63–93). Uppsala: Opuscula Historica Upsaliensia.Google Scholar
  19. Middendorf, J., Mickete, J., Saunders, T., Najar, J., & Clark-Huckstep, A. E. (2015). What’s feeling got to do with it? Decoding emotional bottlenecks in the history classroom. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 14(2), 166–180.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214552655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montanero, M., & Lucero, M. (2011). Causal discourse and the teaching of history: How do teachers explain historical causality? Instructional Science, 39, 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neumann, F. (2015). How does a historian read a scholarly text and how do students learn to do the same? In D. Ludvigsson & A. Booth (Eds.), Enriching history teaching and learning: Challenges, possibilities, practice (pp. 67–83). Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
  22. Nokes, J. D. (2013). Building students’ historical literacies: Learning to read and reason with historical texts and evidence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. North, J. (2004). The ambassador’s secret: Holbein and the world of the Renaissance. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  24. Ormond, B. M. (2011). Shifts in knowledge teaching: The unexpected consequences of assessment practices on secondary history. Pacific-Asian Education, 23(1), 5–22.Google Scholar
  25. Ormond, B. M. (2016). Curriculum decisions—The challenges of teacher autonomy over knowledge selection for history. Journal of Curriculum Studies. Retrieved August 21, 2016 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1149225.
  26. Pace, D. (2012). Decoding historical evidence. In D. Ludvigsson, (Ed.), Enhancing student learning in history: Perspectives on university history teaching (Vol. 48, pp. 49–62). Uppsala: Opuscula Historica Upsaliensia.Google Scholar
  27. Porat, D. A. (2004). It’s not written here, but this is what happened: Students’ cultural comprehension of textbook narratives on the Israeli-Arab conflict. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 963–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reisman, A. (2012). Reading like a historian: A document-based history curriculum intervention in urban high schools. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 86–112.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.63408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seixas, P. (2006). Teacher notes: Benchmarks of historical thinking: A framework for assessment in Canada. Retrieved October 28, 2016 from http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/cur/socstud/foundation_gr8/tns/tn1.pdf.
  30. Seixas, P., & Morton, T. (2013). The big six: Historical thinking concepts. Toronto: Nelson Education.Google Scholar
  31. Selwyn, J. D. (2015). Adventures in experiential education: Online teaching and learning. Sixteenth Century Journal, XLV I(4), 1019–1022.Google Scholar
  32. Shemilt, D. (2000). The Caliph’s coin: The currency of narrative frameworks in history teaching. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 83–101). New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Shemilt, D. (2009). Drinking an ocean and pissing a cupful: How adolescents make sense of history. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 141–209). Charlotte: Information Age.Google Scholar
  34. Sheridan, G. (2009). Louder than words: Ways of seeing women workers in eighteenth-century France. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sipress, J. M., & Voelker, D. J. (2011). The end of the history survey course: The rise and fall of the coverage model. The Journal of American History, 97(4), 1050–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sjöberg, M. (1996). Föreställningar om män och kvinnor i det sena 1700-talet. In T. Lindkvist (Ed.), Metodövningar i historia 2 (pp. 65–91). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  37. Sleeper-Smith, S., Barr, J., O’Brien, J. M., Shoemaker, N., & Stevens, S. M. (Eds.). (2015). Why you can’t teach United States history without American Indians. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sundberg, S. B. (2006, November). An investigation of the effects of exam essay questions on student learning in United States History Survey classes. The History Teacher, 40(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  39. Symcox, L., & Wilschut, A. (2009). Introduction. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 1–11). Charlotte: Information Age.Google Scholar
  40. Vacca, J. S., & Levitt, R. (2011). Using scaffolding techniques to teach a lesson about the Civil War. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(18), 150–161.Google Scholar
  41. Wilschut, A. (2009). Testing frame of reference knowledge in national examinations: Report on an experiment in the Netherlands. In L. Symcox & A. Wilschut (Eds.), National history standards: The problem of the Canon and the future of teaching history (pp. 85–112). Charlotte: Information Age.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations