FCB Estimation Using IGS Real-Time Products and Its Application in Precise Point Positioning
Real-time capability , positioning accuracy and convergence time ar e the keys to the performance of Precise Point Positioning (PPP). In recent years, the development of IGS Real-Time Services (RTS) has improved the performance of real-time PPP to a large extent. Meanwhile, the PPP ambiguity resolution technique, which significantly improves the positioning accuracy and convergence time, has become mature gradually. If the advantages of both techniques can be combined to realize real-time PPP with ambiguity resolution, the application of PPP would be greatly expanded. In this paper, a real-time satellite-satellite single-difference fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation method based on RTS products is proposed. To meet the demand of real-time PPP, narrow-lane FCBs are forecasted by short-term linear extrapolation. Taking accuracy levels and data amount into consideration, the forecasting interval for real-time wide-lane and narrow-lane FCBs are determined. Finally, the performance of real-time PPP with ambiguity resolution using real-time FCBs is evaluated in both static and kinematic modes. The results show that wide-lane FCBs to be forecasted daily and narrow-lane FCBs to be forecasted every 5 min can satisfy the need of real-time PPP with ambiguity resolution. In static mode, the average time to first fix (TTFF) is 15.97 min, and the average precision of the north, east and up components for hourly solution are 1.51, 1.64 and 2.18 cm respectively. As for kinematic mode, an average TTFF of 24.36 min is needed, and the 3D position error in fixed solution is decreased by 42.59% compared with float solution.
KeywordsPrecise point positioning Fractional cycle bias Ambiguity resolution Real-time solution Least square fit
This research work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (41604032).
- 2.Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2007) The International GNSS service (IGS): preparations for the coming decade. Bulletin of the American Astronomical SocietyGoogle Scholar
- 3.Caissy M, Agrotis L, Weber G, Fisher S (2013) The IGS real-time service. EGU General Assembly, 07–12 Apr. 2013, Vienna AustriaGoogle Scholar
- 5.Wubbena G, Schmitz M, Bagge A (2005) PPP-RTK: precise point positioning using state-space representation in RTK Networks. ION GNSS 2005, Long Beach, CA, September 2584–2594Google Scholar
- 6.Gebhard H, Weber G (2003) NTRIP: networked transport of RTCM via internet protocol—internet radio technology for real-time GNSS purposes. AGU Fall Meeting. AGU Fall Meeting AbstractsGoogle Scholar
- 7.Li P (2016) Research on methodology of rapid ambiguity resolution for GNSS precise point position. Wuhan University, WuhanGoogle Scholar
- 11.Laurichesse D (2011) The CNES Real-time PPP with undifferenced integer ambiguity resolution demonstrator. Proc Int Tech Meeting Satellite Div Inst Navig 10(1):654–662Google Scholar
- 13.Shao K, Gu D, Tu X, Duan X, Liu H (2016) Applications of IGS real-time products in precise point positioning and LEO satellites precise orbit determination. China satellite navigation conference (CSNC), ChangshaGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wang J, Zhou L, Jiang T, Sun G (2014) A simple linear fitting method based on weighted total least square. Bull Surveying Mapp 4:33–35Google Scholar
- 15.International GNSS Service (IGS). IGS Real-time Service. http://www.igs.org/rts/products/. Accessed 12 June 2016
- 16.National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). igc orbits and clocks [DB/OL]. ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/gps/products/rtpp/1967/. Accessed 17 Sept 2017