Skip to main content

A Troposphere Tomography Method by Combining the Truncation Coefficient and Variance Component Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2018 Proceedings (CSNC 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 497))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2015 Accesses

Abstract

Traditional troposphere tomography method cannot use the GNSS signals penetrating from the side face of research area, which not only decreases the utilization rate of GNSS observation but also leads to a low percentage of voxels crossed by rays. In order to overcome this issue, the GNSS signals penetrating from the model’s side face are also used to build the observation equation by introducing the truncation coefficient in this paper. Due to the fact that the tomography modeling is consists of various equations, including observation equation (using signals from the side and top faces of research area to build equations), horizontal and vertical equations, how to determine the weightings of different equations is a key to obtain the reliable tomographic result. Therefore, a method is proposed to determine the weightings of various equations based on the variance component analysis (VCA). The data from Satellite Positioning Reference Station Network (SatRef) of Hong Kong over the period of 27 days is selected for the tomography experiment. The tomographic result shows that the proposed method is of ability to obtain a good quality. Comparing to the traditional method, the utilization rate and number of voxels crossed by rays have been improved by 32.21 and 12.23%, respectively. When compared to the radiosonde data, the RMS error of the reconstructed integral water vapor (IWV) derived from the proposed method (4.2 mm) superior to that from the traditional method (5.2 mm). The comparison of water vapor profiles also shows that the proposed method with a RMS value of 1.30 g/m3, is smaller than that of traditional method with a value of 1.58 g/m3, and the accuracy of tomographic result based on the proposed method is increased by 17.7%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bevis M, Businger S, Herring T, Rocken C et al (1992) GPS meteorology-remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the global positioning system. J Geophys Res 97(D14):15787–15801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rocken C, Ware R, Van Hove T et al (1993) Sensing atmospheric water vapor with the global positioning system. Geophys Res Lett 20(23):2631–2634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Duan J, Bevis M, Fang P et al (1996) GPS meteorology: direct estimation of the absolute value of precipitable water. J Appl Meteorol 35(6):830–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emardson TR, Johansson J, Elgered G (2000) The systematic behavior of water vapor estimates using four years of GPS observations. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 38(1):324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gendt G, Dick G, Reigber C et al (2004) Near real time GPS water vapor monitoring for numerical weather prediction in Germany. J Mereorol Soc Jpn 82(1B):361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith TL, Benjamin SG, Gutman SI et al (2007) Short-range forecast impact from assimilation of GPS-IPW observations into the rapid update cycle. Mon Weather Rev 135(8):2914–2930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raja MRV, Gutman SI, Yoe JG et al (2008) The validation of AIRS retrievals of integrated precipitable water vapor using measurements from a network of ground-based GPS receivers over the contiguous United States. J Atmos Ocean Technol 25(3):416–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Haan S, Holleman I, Holtslag AA (2009) Real-time water vapor maps from a GPS surface network: construction, validation, and applications. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48(7):1302–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SW, Kouba J, Schutz B et al (2013) Monitoring precipitable water vapor in real-time using global navigation satellite systems. J Geodesy 87(10–12):923–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenot H, Wautelet G, Warnant R et al (2014) GNSS meteorology and impact on NRT position. In: European navigation conference (ENC) GNSS 2014

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen B, Liu Z (2014) Voxel-optimized regional water vapor tomography and comparison with radiosonde and numerical weather model. J Geodesy 88(7):691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Braun J, Rocken C, Meertens C et al (1999) Development of a water vapor tomography system using low cost L1 GPS receivers. In: Ninth ARM science team meeting, US Department of Energy, San Antonio, Tex, pp 22–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Radon J (1917) Über die Bestimmung von Funktionen durch ihre In-te-gral-werte längs gewisser Mannigfaltigkeiten. Comput Tomogr 69:262–277

    Google Scholar 

  14. Flores A, Ruffini G, Rius A (2000) 4D tropospheric tomography using GPS slant wet delays. Annales Geophysicae 18(2):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alshawaf F (2013) Constructing water vapor maps by fusing InSAR, GNSS and WRF data. Karlsruhe, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benevides P, Nico G, Catalao J et al (2015) Merging SAR interferometry and GPS tomography for high-resolution mapping of 3D tropospheric water vapour. In: IEEE international geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS), pp 3607–3610

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rohm W, Bosy J (2011) The verification of GNSS tropospheric tomography model in a mountainous area. Adv Space Res 47(10):1721–1730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Baelen J, Reverdy M, Tridon F et al (2011) On the relationship between water vapour field evolution and the life cycle of precipitation systems. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(S1):204–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Benevides P, Catalão J, Miranda PM (2014) Experimental GNSS tomography study in Lisbon (Portugal). Física de la Tierra 26:65–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirahara K (2000) Local GPS tropospheric tomography. Earth Planets Space 52(11):935–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Troller M, Burki B, Cocard M, Geiger A et al (2002) 3-D refractivity field from GPS double difference tomography. Geophys Res Lett 29:2149–2152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Perler D, Geiger A, Hurter F (2011) 4D GPS water vapour tomography: new parameterized approaches. J Geophys Res 85:539–550

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skone S, Hoyle V (2005) Troposphere modeling in a regional GPS network. Positioning 4(1&2):230–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bender M, Raabe A (2007) Preconditions to ground based GPS water vapour tomography. Ann Geophys 25(8):1727–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wen D, Liu S, Tang P (2010) Tomographic reconstruction of ionospheric electron density based on constrained algebraic reconstruction technique. GPS Solutions 14(4):375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55(2):251–276

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74(366):427–431

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1981) Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49(4):1057–1072

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank IGAR for providing access to the web-based IGAR data. The Lands Department of HKSAR is also acknowledge for providing GPS data from the Hong Kong Satellite Positioning Reference Station Network (SatRef) and the corresponding meteorological data. This research was supported by the Excellent Youth Science and Technology Fund Project of Xi’an University of Science and Technology (2018YQ3-15) and the Startup Foundation for Doctor of Xi’an University of Science and Technology (2017QDJ041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingzhi Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, Q., Yao, Y., Xin, L. (2018). A Troposphere Tomography Method by Combining the Truncation Coefficient and Variance Component Analysis. In: Sun, J., Yang, C., Guo, S. (eds) China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2018 Proceedings. CSNC 2018. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 497. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0005-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0005-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-0004-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-0005-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics